Softwr

Software · head to head

Assistant.to vs Subframe

Assistant.to logo

Assistant.to

Software

The easiest way to schedule meetings

From
Free
Rated
-
S

Subframe

Software

The AI-native design tool built for code

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it; Subframe the free plan is capped at 1 project, 10 pages, and 2 prototypes with limited AI usage and only 24 hour version history, versus unlimited AI on the $29 per editor per month Pro plan, as of August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and Subframe actually diverge.

Attributes where Assistant.to and Subframe differ
AttributeAssistant.toSubframe
PlatformsChrome-extensionWeb
Founded2014Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Assistant.to

  • In-email scheduling
  • One-click booking
  • Google Calendar sync
  • Time zone handling
  • Simple interface
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar
  • Chrome-extension support

Only in Subframe

Nothing recorded that Assistant.to does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Assistant.to

  • Schedulingnot Subframe
  • Appointment bookingnot Subframe
  • Time trackingnot Subframe
  • Resource managementnot Subframe
  • Team coordinationnot Subframe

Subframe

No use cases recorded yet. See the Subframe review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Assistant.to

  • No longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it
  • Its scheduling now sits inside a wider Salesforce-focused sales tool rather than being a standalone add-in

Subframe

  • The free plan is capped at 1 project, 10 pages, and 2 prototypes with limited AI usage and only 24 hour version history, versus unlimited AI on the $29 per editor per month Pro plan, as of August 2026.

Pricing, plan by plan

Assistant.to

Free
  • FreeFree
    • In-email scheduling
    • Basic features
  • Pro$5/month
    • Team features
    • Custom branding
    • Priority support

Subframe

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Subframe review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Assistant.to if

  • You need in-email scheduling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Chrome-extension.
  • You also want one-click booking.

Choose Subframe if

  • You want to start without paying.

Questions people ask

Is Assistant.to or Subframe better?
Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and Subframe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or Subframe?
Assistant.to starts at Free and Subframe at Free.
Does Assistant.to or Subframe run on more platforms?
Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. Subframe runs on Web.
Can I use Assistant.to for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Assistant.to best used for?
Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Subframe is typically brought in for.
What can Assistant.to do that Subframe cannot?
Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling.

Related pages

Other head to heads