Software · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs CloudWatch

Amazon Aurora
Software
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; CloudWatch the free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, CloudWatch covers Metrics collection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and CloudWatch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | CloudWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Web, Api |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (2006).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in CloudWatch
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
- Alarms and notifications
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Api support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot CloudWatch
- Data storagenot CloudWatch
- Application backendnot CloudWatch
- Reportingnot CloudWatch
- Data analyticsnot CloudWatch
CloudWatch
- Metrics and log collection for AWS workloadsnot Amazon Aurora
- Alarming on thresholds across AWS servicesnot Amazon Aurora
- Querying logs with Logs Insightsnot Amazon Aurora
- Live tailing logs during an incidentnot Amazon Aurora
- Distributed tracing alongside X-Raynot Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
CloudWatch
- The free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- Custom metrics are $0.30 each for the first 10,000, so instrumenting broadly gets expensive before volume discounts apply
- Each custom dashboard beyond the free three is $3 a month
- Alarms are billed at $0.10 per alarm metric a month, with high-resolution alarms costing more
- Log storage beyond the free 5 GB is $0.03 per GB per month on top of the ingestion charge
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
CloudWatch
Free- FreeFree
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose CloudWatch if
- You need metrics collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log aggregation.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or CloudWatch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and CloudWatch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or CloudWatch?
- Amazon Aurora starts at Free and CloudWatch at Free.
- Does Amazon Aurora or CloudWatch run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. CloudWatch runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what CloudWatch is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that CloudWatch cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Log aggregation, Dashboards, Alarms and notifications. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceAmazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceAmazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Aurora vs Airtable
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs DuckDB
- Amazon Aurora vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon Redshift
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Aurora vs Cassandra
- Amazon Aurora vs CouchDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- Amazon Aurora vs Elastic Stack
- Amazon Aurora vs New Relic
- Amazon Aurora vs Datadog Logs
- Amazon Aurora vs Coralogix
- Amazon Aurora vs Grafana Loki
- Amazon Aurora vs Dynatrace
- Amazon Aurora vs InfluxDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Airbrake
- Amazon Aurora vs AppDynamics
- Amazon Aurora vs Axiom
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure Monitor
- Amazon Aurora vs Better Stack
- Amazon Aurora vs Bugsnag
- Amazon Aurora vs Dynatrace Logs
- Amazon Aurora vs Elastic
- Amazon Aurora vs Elastic APM
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch Service
- Amazon Aurora vs ELK Stack
- CloudWatch vs Cockroach Labs
- CloudWatch vs PostgreSQL
- CloudWatch vs Airtable
- CloudWatch vs Elasticsearch
- CloudWatch vs PlanetScale
- CloudWatch vs Azure SQL
- CloudWatch vs ClickHouse
- CloudWatch vs Couchbase
- CloudWatch vs DuckDB
- CloudWatch vs DynamoDB
- CloudWatch vs MariaDB
- CloudWatch vs Oracle Database
- CloudWatch vs Amazon RDS
- CloudWatch vs Amazon Redshift
- CloudWatch vs Apache Druid
- CloudWatch vs Cassandra
- CloudWatch vs CouchDB
- CloudWatch vs Firebolt
- CloudWatch vs Elastic Stack
- CloudWatch vs New Relic
- CloudWatch vs Datadog Logs
- CloudWatch vs Coralogix
- CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace
- CloudWatch vs InfluxDB
- CloudWatch vs Airbrake
- CloudWatch vs AppDynamics
- CloudWatch vs Axiom
- CloudWatch vs Azure Monitor
- CloudWatch vs Better Stack
- CloudWatch vs Bugsnag
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace Logs
- CloudWatch vs Elastic
- CloudWatch vs Elastic APM
- CloudWatch vs Elasticsearch Service
- CloudWatch vs ELK Stack

