Database & Data Management · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs Elastic APM

Amazon Aurora
Database & Data Management
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Elastic APM
Log Management
Application Performance Monitoring from Elastic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; Elastic APM pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and Elastic APM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | Elastic APM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Web, Api |
| Category | Database & Data Management | Log Management |
| Founded | 2006 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in Elastic APM
- Performance monitoring
- Error tracking
- Transaction tracing
- Custom metrics
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Api support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot Elastic APM
- Data storagenot Elastic APM
- Application backendnot Elastic APM
- Reportingnot Elastic APM
- Data analyticsnot Elastic APM
Elastic APM
- Distributed tracing across microservicesnot Amazon Aurora
- Auto-instrumenting Java, .NET, Python, Go, Node.js, Ruby, PHP and C++ servicesnot Amazon Aurora
- OpenTelemetry-native collection through the Elastic distributionsnot Amazon Aurora
- Correlating latency and errors with machine learningnot Amazon Aurora
- Monitoring LLM calls alongside application tracesnot Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
Elastic APM
- Pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service
- Self-managed deployment means running and scaling Elasticsearch yourself
- Serverless does not carry every capability the hosted option does
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
Elastic APM
Free- FreeFree
- Performance monitoring
- Error tracking
- Transaction tracing
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose Elastic APM if
- You need performance monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want error tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or Elastic APM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and Elastic APM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or Elastic APM?
- Amazon Aurora starts at Free and Elastic APM at Free.
- Does Amazon Aurora or Elastic APM run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. Elastic APM runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what Elastic APM is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that Elastic APM cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring, Error tracking, Transaction tracing, Custom metrics. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceAmazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceAmazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
More on Elastic APM
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Aurora vs Airtable
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs DuckDB
- Amazon Aurora vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon Redshift
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Aurora vs Cassandra
- Amazon Aurora vs CouchDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- Amazon Aurora vs Elastic Stack
- Amazon Aurora vs New Relic
- Amazon Aurora vs Datadog Logs
- Amazon Aurora vs Coralogix
- Amazon Aurora vs Grafana Loki
- Amazon Aurora vs CloudWatch
- Amazon Aurora vs Dynatrace
- Amazon Aurora vs InfluxDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Airbrake
- Amazon Aurora vs AppDynamics
- Amazon Aurora vs Axiom
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure Monitor
- Amazon Aurora vs Better Stack
- Amazon Aurora vs Bugsnag
- Amazon Aurora vs Dynatrace Logs
- Amazon Aurora vs Elastic
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch Service
- Amazon Aurora vs ELK Stack
- Elastic APM vs Cockroach Labs
- Elastic APM vs PostgreSQL
- Elastic APM vs Airtable
- Elastic APM vs Elasticsearch
- Elastic APM vs PlanetScale
- Elastic APM vs Azure SQL
- Elastic APM vs ClickHouse
- Elastic APM vs Couchbase
- Elastic APM vs DuckDB
- Elastic APM vs DynamoDB
- Elastic APM vs MariaDB
- Elastic APM vs Oracle Database
- Elastic APM vs Amazon RDS
- Elastic APM vs Amazon Redshift
- Elastic APM vs Apache Druid
- Elastic APM vs Cassandra
- Elastic APM vs CouchDB
- Elastic APM vs Firebolt
- Elastic APM vs Elastic Stack
- Elastic APM vs New Relic
- Elastic APM vs Datadog Logs
- Elastic APM vs Coralogix
- Elastic APM vs Grafana Loki
- Elastic APM vs CloudWatch
- Elastic APM vs Dynatrace
- Elastic APM vs InfluxDB
- Elastic APM vs Airbrake
- Elastic APM vs AppDynamics
- Elastic APM vs Axiom
- Elastic APM vs Azure Monitor
- Elastic APM vs Better Stack
- Elastic APM vs Bugsnag
- Elastic APM vs Dynatrace Logs
- Elastic APM vs Elastic
- Elastic APM vs Elasticsearch Service
- Elastic APM vs ELK Stack
