Cloud & Infrastructure · head to head
Akamai vs Consul

Akamai
Cloud & Infrastructure
Leading content delivery and security platform
- From
- $1000/month
- Rated
- -

Consul
Network & Connectivity
Service discovery, networking, and security
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Consul has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Akamai only the cloud computing services carry published rates; security and content delivery products require contacting sales for a price; Consul namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only
- They diverge on capability: Akamai covers CDN, Consul covers Service discovery.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akamai and Consul actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akamai
- CDN
- DDoS Protection
- Web Application Firewall
- Bot Management
- Image Optimization
- Video Platform
- API Gateway
- Analytics
Only in Consul
- Service discovery
- Health checking
- Key/value store
- Multi-datacenter
- DNS interface
- Service mesh
- Load balancing
- Configuration management
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akamai
- Content delivery and web performance through Ion and adaptive media deliverynot Consul
- DDoS protection, bot management and API securitynot Consul
- Running compute, Kubernetes and managed databases on Akamai's cloudnot Consul
- Edge compute with EdgeWorkersnot Consul
- Zero trust access for enterprise applicationsnot Consul
Consul
- Service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructurenot Akamai
- Running a service mesh with mutual TLS between servicesnot Akamai
- Distributed key value configuration storage for applicationsnot Akamai
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akamai
- Only the cloud computing services carry published rates; security and content delivery products require contacting sales for a price
- Cloud pricing varies by region across North America, Europe and Asia Pacific rather than being a single rate
Consul
- Namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only
- Audit logging, OIDC authentication and FIPS 140-2 builds require Consul Enterprise, so compliance driven deployments cannot use the free edition
- Automated backups, redundancy zones, read replicas and automated server upgrades are Enterprise only
- Long Term Support releases are Enterprise only, so community users must upgrade to stay supported
- Service mesh and advanced traffic management sit in the Premium Enterprise tier above Standard Enterprise
- HashiCorp does not publish a Consul rate on its pricing page, which lists per resource prices for Terraform instead
Pricing, plan by plan
Akamai
$1000/month- CDN$1000/month
- Content delivery
- Global edge network
- Real-time analytics
- Security Suite$2000/month
- DDoS protection
- WAF
- Bot management
Consul
Free- Open SourceFree
- Service discovery
- Health checking
- KV store
Which should you pick?
Choose Consul if
- You need service discovery.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- You also want health checking.
Questions people ask
- Is Akamai or Consul better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akamai starts at $1000/month and Consul at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akamai or Consul?
- Consul has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1000/month for Akamai and Free for Consul.
- Does Akamai or Consul run on more platforms?
- Akamai runs on Web, Api. Consul runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
- Can I use Consul for free?
- Yes. Consul has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Akamai starts at $1000/month.
- What is Akamai best used for?
- Akamai is most often used for content delivery and web performance through ion and adaptive media delivery, ddos protection, bot management and api security, running compute, kubernetes and managed databases on akamai's cloud, edge compute with edgeworkers. Of those, content delivery and web performance through ion and adaptive media delivery and ddos protection, bot management and api security are not what Consul is typically brought in for.
- What can Akamai do that Consul cannot?
- Akamai covers CDN, DDoS Protection, Web Application Firewall, Bot Management. Consul covers Service discovery, Health checking, Key/value store, Multi-datacenter. Both handle Cloud deployment.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akamai vs Grafana Cloud
- Akamai vs Neon
- Akamai vs DigitalOcean
- Akamai vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Akamai vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Akamai vs Deno Deploy
- Akamai vs Heroku
- Akamai vs Hetzner Cloud
- Akamai vs Linode
- Akamai vs Packer
- Akamai vs Pulumi
- Akamai vs Render
- Akamai vs Upstash
- Akamai vs Vagrant
- Akamai vs Vultr
- Akamai vs Alibaba Cloud
- Akamai vs Chef
- Akamai vs Contabo
- Akamai vs Prometheus
- Akamai vs Cloudflare
- Akamai vs Grafana
- Akamai vs Ivanti
- Akamai vs Palo Alto Networks
- Akamai vs Splunk
- Akamai vs Tailscale
- Akamai vs Traefik
- Akamai vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Consul vs Grafana Cloud
- Consul vs Neon
- Consul vs DigitalOcean
- Consul vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Consul vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Consul vs Deno Deploy
- Consul vs Heroku
- Consul vs Hetzner Cloud
- Consul vs Linode
- Consul vs Packer
- Consul vs Pulumi
- Consul vs Render
- Consul vs Upstash
- Consul vs Vagrant
- Consul vs Vultr
- Consul vs Alibaba Cloud
- Consul vs Chef
- Consul vs Contabo
- Consul vs Prometheus
- Consul vs Cloudflare
- Consul vs Grafana
- Consul vs Ivanti
- Consul vs Palo Alto Networks
- Consul vs Splunk
- Consul vs Tailscale
- Consul vs Traefik
- Consul vs Ubiquiti UniFi
