Software · head to head
Akamai vs Palo Alto Networks
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Akamai only the cloud computing services carry published rates; security and content delivery products require contacting sales for a price; Palo Alto Networks enterprise-focused pricing model
- They diverge on capability: Akamai covers CDN, Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akamai and Palo Alto Networks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Akamai | Palo Alto Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1000/month | On request |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid |
| Founded | 1998 | 2005 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akamai
- CDN
- DDoS Protection
- Web Application Firewall
- Bot Management
- Image Optimization
- Video Platform
- API Gateway
- Analytics
Only in Palo Alto Networks
- Advanced threat prevention
- Threat detection and response
- Cloud security
- Endpoint protection
- Network security
- API protection
- Incident response
- Threat intelligence
Both cover
- AWS
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akamai
- Content delivery and web performance through Ion and adaptive media deliverynot Palo Alto Networks
- DDoS protection, bot management and API securitynot Palo Alto Networks
- Running compute, Kubernetes and managed databases on Akamai's cloudnot Palo Alto Networks
- Edge compute with EdgeWorkersnot Palo Alto Networks
- Zero trust access for enterprise applicationsnot Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto Networks
- Enterprise network security and threat protectionnot Akamai
- Cloud-native application protectionnot Akamai
- Identity and access securitynot Akamai
- Security operations and incident responsenot Akamai
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akamai
- Only the cloud computing services carry published rates; security and content delivery products require contacting sales for a price
- Cloud pricing varies by region across North America, Europe and Asia Pacific rather than being a single rate
Palo Alto Networks
- Enterprise-focused pricing model
- Complex implementation required
Pricing, plan by plan
Akamai
$1000/month- CDN$1000/month
- Content delivery
- Global edge network
- Real-time analytics
- Security Suite$2000/month
- DDoS protection
- WAF
- Bot management
Palo Alto Networks
On request- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Threat prevention
- Detection and response
- Cloud security
Which should you pick?
Choose Palo Alto Networks if
- You need advanced threat prevention.
- You work on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
- You also want threat detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is Akamai or Palo Alto Networks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akamai starts at $1000/month and Palo Alto Networks at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akamai or Palo Alto Networks?
- Akamai starts at $1000/month and Palo Alto Networks at On request.
- Does Akamai or Palo Alto Networks run on more platforms?
- Akamai runs on Web, Api. Palo Alto Networks runs on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
- What is Akamai best used for?
- Akamai is most often used for content delivery and web performance through ion and adaptive media delivery, ddos protection, bot management and api security, running compute, kubernetes and managed databases on akamai's cloud, edge compute with edgeworkers. Of those, content delivery and web performance through ion and adaptive media delivery and ddos protection, bot management and api security are not what Palo Alto Networks is typically brought in for.
- What can Akamai do that Palo Alto Networks cannot?
- Akamai covers CDN, DDoS Protection, Web Application Firewall, Bot Management. Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention, Threat detection and response, Cloud security, Endpoint protection. Both handle AWS, Cloud deployment, Web support.
Related pages
More on Palo Alto Networks
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Akamai vs Grafana Cloud
- Akamai vs Neon
- Akamai vs DigitalOcean
- Akamai vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Akamai vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Akamai vs Deno Deploy
- Akamai vs Heroku
- Akamai vs Hetzner Cloud
- Akamai vs Linode
- Akamai vs Packer
- Akamai vs Pulumi
- Akamai vs Render
- Akamai vs Upstash
- Akamai vs Vagrant
- Akamai vs Vultr
- Akamai vs Alibaba Cloud
- Akamai vs Chef
- Akamai vs Contabo
- Akamai vs Prometheus
- Akamai vs Cloudflare
- Akamai vs Consul
- Akamai vs Grafana
- Akamai vs Ivanti
- Akamai vs Splunk
- Akamai vs Tailscale
- Akamai vs Traefik
- Akamai vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Palo Alto Networks vs Grafana Cloud
- Palo Alto Networks vs Neon
- Palo Alto Networks vs DigitalOcean
- Palo Alto Networks vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Palo Alto Networks vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Palo Alto Networks vs Deno Deploy
- Palo Alto Networks vs Heroku
- Palo Alto Networks vs Hetzner Cloud
- Palo Alto Networks vs Linode
- Palo Alto Networks vs Packer
- Palo Alto Networks vs Pulumi
- Palo Alto Networks vs Render
- Palo Alto Networks vs Upstash
- Palo Alto Networks vs Vagrant
- Palo Alto Networks vs Vultr
- Palo Alto Networks vs Alibaba Cloud
- Palo Alto Networks vs Chef
- Palo Alto Networks vs Contabo
- Palo Alto Networks vs Prometheus
- Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare
- Palo Alto Networks vs Consul
- Palo Alto Networks vs Grafana
- Palo Alto Networks vs Ivanti
- Palo Alto Networks vs Splunk
- Palo Alto Networks vs Tailscale
- Palo Alto Networks vs Traefik
- Palo Alto Networks vs Ubiquiti UniFi


