Softwr

Software · head to head

Datadog Logs vs Palo Alto Networks

Datadog Logs logo

Datadog Logs

Software

Log Management and Analytics

From
$0.1/per GB ingested per month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Palo Alto Networks logo

Palo Alto Networks

Software

Enterprise cybersecurity platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Datadog Logs complex, multi-tiered pricing model based on ingestion, indexing, and storage; can become expensive at scale; Palo Alto Networks enterprise-focused pricing model
  • They diverge on capability: Datadog Logs covers Log ingestion, Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Datadog Logs and Palo Alto Networks actually diverge.

Attributes where Datadog Logs and Palo Alto Networks differ
AttributeDatadog LogsPalo Alto Networks
Starting price$0.1/per GB ingested per monthOn request
Pricing modelusage-basedsubscription
PlatformsCloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud)Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid
Founded20102005

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Datadog Logs

  • Log ingestion
  • Full-text search
  • Custom dashboards
  • Log-based metrics
  • API
  • Webhooks
  • REST
  • Api support

Only in Palo Alto Networks

  • Advanced threat prevention
  • Threat detection and response
  • Cloud security
  • Endpoint protection
  • Network security
  • API protection
  • Incident response
  • Threat intelligence

Both cover

  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Datadog Logs

  • Centralised log aggregation and analysisnot Palo Alto Networks
  • Multi-source log correlation with metrics and tracesnot Palo Alto Networks
  • Root cause analysis and troubleshootingnot Palo Alto Networks
  • Security monitoring and threat detectionnot Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

  • Enterprise network security and threat protectionnot Datadog Logs
  • Cloud-native application protectionnot Datadog Logs
  • Identity and access securitynot Datadog Logs
  • Security operations and incident responsenot Datadog Logs

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Datadog Logs

  • Complex, multi-tiered pricing model based on ingestion, indexing, and storage; can become expensive at scale
  • Ingestion pricing of $0.10/GB can accumulate rapidly for high-volume logging environments

Palo Alto Networks

  • Enterprise-focused pricing model
  • Complex implementation required

Pricing, plan by plan

Datadog Logs

$0.1/per GB ingested per month

No published plan breakdown. See the Datadog Logs review.

Palo Alto Networks

On request
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Threat prevention
    • Detection and response
    • Cloud security

Which should you pick?

Choose Datadog Logs if

  • You need log ingestion.
  • You work on Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud).
  • You also want full-text search.
Datadog Logs review

Choose Palo Alto Networks if

  • You need advanced threat prevention.
  • You work on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
  • You also want threat detection and response.
Palo Alto Networks review

Questions people ask

Is Datadog Logs or Palo Alto Networks better?
Neither clearly leads. Datadog Logs starts at $0.1/per GB ingested per month and Palo Alto Networks at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Datadog Logs or Palo Alto Networks?
Datadog Logs starts at $0.1/per GB ingested per month and Palo Alto Networks at On request.
Does Datadog Logs or Palo Alto Networks run on more platforms?
Datadog Logs runs on Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud). Palo Alto Networks runs on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
What is Datadog Logs best used for?
Datadog Logs is most often used for centralised log aggregation and analysis, multi-source log correlation with metrics and traces, root cause analysis and troubleshooting, security monitoring and threat detection. Of those, centralised log aggregation and analysis and multi-source log correlation with metrics and traces are not what Palo Alto Networks is typically brought in for.
What can Datadog Logs do that Palo Alto Networks cannot?
Datadog Logs covers Log ingestion, Full-text search, Custom dashboards, Log-based metrics. Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention, Threat detection and response, Cloud security, Endpoint protection. Both handle Web support.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Datadog Logs

More on Palo Alto Networks

Keep looking

Other head to heads