Software · head to head
Vitess vs Convex

Vitess
Software
Scalable database clustering system for horizontal scaling of MySQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Convex
Software
The reactive backend platform that keeps up with you and your agents
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Vitess has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Vitess vTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties; Convex the Free and Starter tier includes only 1 million function calls and 0.5 GB of database storage per month before per-unit overage charges of $2.20 per million calls apply, as of August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Vitess and Convex actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Vitess
- Horizontal Sharding
- Connection Pooling
- Query Routing
- Online Schema Changes
- Shard Management
- Replication Management
- Automated Failover
- MySQL
Only in Convex
Nothing recorded that Vitess does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Vitess
- Transaction processingnot Convex
- Data storagenot Convex
- Application backendnot Convex
- Reportingnot Convex
- Data analyticsnot Convex
Convex
No use cases recorded yet. See the Convex review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Vitess
- VTGate scatter queries without sharding key incur significant performance penalties
- Foreign key constraints not enforced across shards, requiring application-level integrity handling
- Single primary per keyspace limits multi-region write capabilities
- Distributed transactions without proper sharding key routing suffer performance degradation
Convex
- The Free and Starter tier includes only 1 million function calls and 0.5 GB of database storage per month before per-unit overage charges of $2.20 per million calls apply, as of August 2026.
Pricing, plan by plan
Vitess
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Vitess review.
Convex
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Convex review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Vitess if
- You need horizontal sharding.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want connection pooling.
Choose Convex if
Nothing in the data separates Convex from Vitess on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Vitess or Convex better?
- Neither clearly leads. Vitess starts at Free and Convex at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Vitess or Convex?
- Vitess has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Vitess and On request for Convex.
- Does Vitess or Convex run on more platforms?
- Vitess runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes. Convex runs on Web.
- Can I use Vitess for free?
- Yes. Vitess has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Convex starts at On request.
- What is Vitess best used for?
- Vitess is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what Convex is typically brought in for.
- What can Vitess do that Convex cannot?
- Vitess covers Horizontal Sharding, Connection Pooling, Query Routing, Online Schema Changes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Vitess: Is Vitess free to use?
Yes. Vitess is completely free and open source under the Apache 2.0 license. It is a graduated CNCF project with no licensing costs or pricing tiers.
SourceVitess: What databases does Vitess support?
Vitess supports MySQL and MariaDB as backend databases. It acts as a middleware layer that adds sharding and orchestration capabilities on top of these databases.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess require Kubernetes to run?
No. Vitess can run on Kubernetes using the Vitess Operator, but it can also be deployed on traditional infrastructure. Kubernetes integration is optional and provides additional automation benefits.
SourceVitess: How does Vitess handle cross-shard transactions?
Vitess supports distributed transactions across shards, but they require queries to be routed through the sharding key. Transactions without a proper sharding key can result in slower performance.
SourceVitess: Does Vitess enforce foreign key constraints?
Vitess does not enforce foreign key constraints across shards by default. Referential integrity must be managed at the application layer, though per-database support can be enabled with limitations.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Vitess vs Cockroach Labs
- Vitess vs PostgreSQL
- Vitess vs Airtable
- Vitess vs Amazon Aurora
- Vitess vs Elasticsearch
- Vitess vs PlanetScale
- Vitess vs Azure SQL
- Vitess vs ClickHouse
- Vitess vs Couchbase
- Vitess vs DuckDB
- Vitess vs DynamoDB
- Vitess vs MariaDB
- Vitess vs Oracle Database
- Vitess vs Amazon RDS
- Vitess vs Amazon Redshift
- Vitess vs Apache Druid
- Vitess vs Cassandra
- Vitess vs CouchDB
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Elasticsearch
- Convex vs PlanetScale
- Convex vs Azure SQL
- Convex vs ClickHouse
- Convex vs Couchbase
- Convex vs DuckDB
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs MariaDB
- Convex vs Oracle Database
- Convex vs Amazon RDS
- Convex vs Amazon Redshift
- Convex vs Apache Druid
- Convex vs Cassandra
- Convex vs CouchDB
