Software · head to head
TimescaleDB vs InfluxDB

TimescaleDB
Software
Time-series database built on PostgreSQL for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

InfluxDB
Software
Purpose-built time series database for metrics and events
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: TimescaleDB inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput; InfluxDB high-cardinality data causes memory pressure and performance degradation
- They diverge on capability: TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization, InfluxDB covers Time-series Storage.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which TimescaleDB and InfluxDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | TimescaleDB | InfluxDB |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure) | Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (2012).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in TimescaleDB
- Time-series Optimization
- PostgreSQL Extension
- Automatic Partitioning
- Continuous Aggregates
- Native Compression
- Full SQL Support
- Real-time Analytics
- PostgreSQL
Only in InfluxDB
- Time-series Storage
- Flux Query Language
- High Write Throughput
- Data Compression
- Retention Policies
- Continuous Queries
- Built-in Dashboards
- Kapacitor
Both cover
- Grafana
- Prometheus
- Telegraf
- Linux support
- Windows support
- Mac support
- Docker support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
TimescaleDB
- Monitoring
- IoT data
- Financial data
- Log analytics
- Observability
InfluxDB
- Monitoring
- IoT data
- Financial data
- Log analytics
- Observability
Both are used for monitoring, iot data, financial data, log analytics, observability, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
TimescaleDB
- Inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- Operational complexity increases significantly at scale, requiring expertise in chunk tuning and autovacuum management
- Bloom filter indexes on compressed columns can return incorrect query results before upgrade
- PostgreSQL 15 support ending June 2026, forcing mandatory upgrades to PostgreSQL 16 or later
InfluxDB
- High-cardinality data causes memory pressure and performance degradation
- No support for joins or transactions like relational databases
- Queries limited to 72-hour window in InfluxDB 3 OSS Core
- Clustering and authentication features absent from community version
Pricing, plan by plan
TimescaleDB
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted TimescaleDB
- MIT-licensed core
- Full PostgreSQL compatibility
- Scale Plan (Cloud)$36/month
- Compute and storage charges
- Multi-node HA
- Unlimited VPCs
InfluxDB
Free- Cloud Serverless FreeFree
- 5 MB writes per 5 minutes
- 300 MB queries per 5 minutes
- 30 day retention
- Cloud Serverless Usage-Based$null/mo
- 0.0025 USD per MB ingested
- 0.012 USD per 100 queries
- 0.002 USD per GB-hour storage
Which should you pick?
Choose TimescaleDB if
- You need time-series optimization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want postgresql extension.
Choose InfluxDB if
- You need time-series storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure.
- You also want flux query language.
Questions people ask
- Is TimescaleDB or InfluxDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. TimescaleDB starts at Free and InfluxDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, TimescaleDB or InfluxDB?
- TimescaleDB starts at Free and InfluxDB at Free.
- Does TimescaleDB or InfluxDB run on more platforms?
- TimescaleDB runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure). InfluxDB runs on Cloud, Docker, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure.
- Can I use TimescaleDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is TimescaleDB best used for?
- TimescaleDB is most often used for monitoring, iot data, financial data, log analytics.
- What can TimescaleDB do that InfluxDB cannot?
- TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization, PostgreSQL Extension, Automatic Partitioning, Continuous Aggregates. InfluxDB covers Time-series Storage, Flux Query Language, High Write Throughput, Data Compression. Both handle Grafana, Prometheus, Telegraf, Linux support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
TimescaleDB: Is TimescaleDB free?
Yes. TimescaleDB is free and open source under the Timescale License. The managed cloud service offers a free trial with $1,000 in credits expiring in 30 days.
SourceInfluxDB: Is there a free tier and what are the limits?
InfluxDB 3 Core OSS is free forever for local development and prototyping. Cloud Serverless free tier includes 5 MB writes per 5 minutes, 300 MB queries per 5 minutes, 30 day retention, and 2 databases.
SourceTimescaleDB: What database does TimescaleDB run on top of?
TimescaleDB is a PostgreSQL extension that runs on top of PostgreSQL. You retain full PostgreSQL compatibility including SQL queries, transactions, and ecosystem tools.
SourceInfluxDB: Can I self-host InfluxDB?
Yes, InfluxDB 3 Core is fully open source and can be self-hosted with no license required. InfluxDB 3 Enterprise is self-managed and includes a 30-day free trial.
SourceTimescaleDB: How much can TimescaleDB compress data?
TimescaleDB offers transparent columnar compression that can reduce storage by up to 95%. Newer data remains in row-oriented format for fast writes, while older data is automatically compressed to the column store.
SourceInfluxDB: What are the series cardinality limitations?
InfluxDB is sensitive to high-cardinality data. High cardinality increases RAM usage and can trigger out-of-memory errors, making it unsuitable for some workloads with many unique tag combinations.
SourceTimescaleDB: Does TimescaleDB require manual partitioning?
No. TimescaleDB handles automatic time-based partitioning through hypertables. Data is automatically chunked based on time intervals, requiring no manual partition management.
SourceInfluxDB: Does InfluxDB support SQL queries?
InfluxDB has limited SQL support. Full SQL is available in InfluxDB 3, but earlier versions support only specific SQL commands and use InfluxQL as the primary query language.
SourceTimescaleDB: What PostgreSQL versions does TimescaleDB support?
As of October 2025, TimescaleDB requires PostgreSQL 16 or greater. PostgreSQL 15 support will end with the June 2026 release, after which all instances must upgrade to PostgreSQL 16.
SourceInfluxDB: Can I export my data from InfluxDB?
Yes, data can be exported from InfluxDB using query results. However, the process and supported formats depend on the version and deployment type you are using.
SourceRelated pages
More on TimescaleDB
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- TimescaleDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TimescaleDB vs PostgreSQL
- TimescaleDB vs Airtable
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon Aurora
- TimescaleDB vs Elasticsearch
- TimescaleDB vs PlanetScale
- TimescaleDB vs Azure SQL
- TimescaleDB vs ClickHouse
- TimescaleDB vs Couchbase
- TimescaleDB vs DuckDB
- TimescaleDB vs DynamoDB
- TimescaleDB vs MariaDB
- TimescaleDB vs Oracle Database
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon RDS
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon Redshift
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Druid
- TimescaleDB vs Cassandra
- TimescaleDB vs CouchDB
- TimescaleDB vs Elastic Stack
- TimescaleDB vs New Relic
- TimescaleDB vs Datadog Logs
- TimescaleDB vs Coralogix
- TimescaleDB vs Grafana Loki
- TimescaleDB vs CloudWatch
- TimescaleDB vs Dynatrace
- TimescaleDB vs Airbrake
- TimescaleDB vs AppDynamics
- TimescaleDB vs Axiom
- TimescaleDB vs Azure Monitor
- TimescaleDB vs Better Stack
- TimescaleDB vs Bugsnag
- TimescaleDB vs Dynatrace Logs
- TimescaleDB vs Elastic
- TimescaleDB vs Elastic APM
- TimescaleDB vs Elasticsearch Service
- TimescaleDB vs ELK Stack
- InfluxDB vs Cockroach Labs
- InfluxDB vs PostgreSQL
- InfluxDB vs Airtable
- InfluxDB vs Amazon Aurora
- InfluxDB vs Elasticsearch
- InfluxDB vs PlanetScale
- InfluxDB vs Azure SQL
- InfluxDB vs ClickHouse
- InfluxDB vs Couchbase
- InfluxDB vs DuckDB
- InfluxDB vs DynamoDB
- InfluxDB vs MariaDB
- InfluxDB vs Oracle Database
- InfluxDB vs Amazon RDS
- InfluxDB vs Amazon Redshift
- InfluxDB vs Apache Druid
- InfluxDB vs Cassandra
- InfluxDB vs CouchDB
- InfluxDB vs Elastic Stack
- InfluxDB vs New Relic
- InfluxDB vs Datadog Logs
- InfluxDB vs Coralogix
- InfluxDB vs Grafana Loki
- InfluxDB vs CloudWatch
- InfluxDB vs Dynatrace
- InfluxDB vs Airbrake
- InfluxDB vs AppDynamics
- InfluxDB vs Axiom
- InfluxDB vs Azure Monitor
- InfluxDB vs Better Stack
- InfluxDB vs Bugsnag
- InfluxDB vs Dynatrace Logs
- InfluxDB vs Elastic
- InfluxDB vs Elastic APM
- InfluxDB vs Elasticsearch Service
- InfluxDB vs ELK Stack
