Software · head to head
PlanetScale vs Subframe
The short version
- Only Subframe has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: PlanetScale eBS High Availability requires 3-node configuration with replication overhead; Subframe the free plan is capped at 1 project, 10 pages, and 2 prototypes with limited AI usage and only 24 hour version history, versus unlimited AI on the $29 per editor per month Pro plan, as of August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PlanetScale and Subframe actually diverge.
| Attribute | PlanetScale | Subframe |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $15/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure) | Web |
| Founded | 2018 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
Only in Subframe
Nothing recorded that PlanetScale does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PlanetScale
- MySQL database hosting with automatic failover and replicationnot Subframe
- Vitess-based sharding for horizontal scaling across large datasetsnot Subframe
- Cloud provider flexibility across AWS, GCP, Azure with 60+ regionsnot Subframe
- Cost-effective database clusters using ARM64 architecture optionsnot Subframe
Subframe
No use cases recorded yet. See the Subframe review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PlanetScale
- EBS High Availability requires 3-node configuration with replication overhead
- EBS Non-HA single-node option lacks redundancy and automatic failover
- Pricing varies by cloud provider and region, requiring queries for specific rates
- ARM64 architecture only available on EBS tier, not Metal deployments
Subframe
- The free plan is capped at 1 project, 10 pages, and 2 prototypes with limited AI usage and only 24 hour version history, versus unlimited AI on the $29 per editor per month Pro plan, as of August 2026.
Pricing, plan by plan
PlanetScale
$15/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the PlanetScale review.
Subframe
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Subframe review.
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Questions people ask
- Is PlanetScale or Subframe better?
- Neither clearly leads. PlanetScale starts at $15/month and Subframe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PlanetScale or Subframe?
- Subframe has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $15/month for PlanetScale and Free for Subframe.
- Does PlanetScale or Subframe run on more platforms?
- PlanetScale runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure). Subframe runs on Web.
- Can I use Subframe for free?
- Yes. Subframe has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. PlanetScale starts at $15/month.
- What is PlanetScale best used for?
- PlanetScale is most often used for mysql database hosting with automatic failover and replication, vitess-based sharding for horizontal scaling across large datasets, cloud provider flexibility across aws, gcp, azure with 60+ regions, cost-effective database clusters using arm64 architecture options. Of those, mysql database hosting with automatic failover and replication and vitess-based sharding for horizontal scaling across large datasets are not what Subframe is typically brought in for.
- What can PlanetScale do that Subframe cannot?
- PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling.
Related pages
More on PlanetScale
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs Airtable
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Elasticsearch
- PlanetScale vs Azure SQL
- PlanetScale vs ClickHouse
- PlanetScale vs Couchbase
- PlanetScale vs DuckDB
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs MariaDB
- PlanetScale vs Oracle Database
- PlanetScale vs Amazon RDS
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Redshift
- PlanetScale vs Apache Druid
- PlanetScale vs Cassandra
- PlanetScale vs CouchDB
- PlanetScale vs Firebolt
- PlanetScale vs Adobe Illustrator
- PlanetScale vs Affinity Designer
- PlanetScale vs Gravit Designer
- PlanetScale vs Linearity Curve
- PlanetScale vs ProtoPie
- PlanetScale vs Rive
- PlanetScale vs Spline
- PlanetScale vs Abstract
- PlanetScale vs Balsamiq Wireframes
- PlanetScale vs Canva
- PlanetScale vs Krea
- PlanetScale vs Magnific
- PlanetScale vs Marvel
- PlanetScale vs Vectr
- PlanetScale vs Zeplin
- Subframe vs Cockroach Labs
- Subframe vs PostgreSQL
- Subframe vs Airtable
- Subframe vs Amazon Aurora
- Subframe vs Elasticsearch
- Subframe vs Azure SQL
- Subframe vs ClickHouse
- Subframe vs Couchbase
- Subframe vs DuckDB
- Subframe vs DynamoDB
- Subframe vs MariaDB
- Subframe vs Oracle Database
- Subframe vs Amazon RDS
- Subframe vs Amazon Redshift
- Subframe vs Apache Druid
- Subframe vs Cassandra
- Subframe vs CouchDB
- Subframe vs Firebolt
- Subframe vs Adobe Illustrator
- Subframe vs Affinity Designer
- Subframe vs Gravit Designer
- Subframe vs Linearity Curve
- Subframe vs ProtoPie
- Subframe vs Rive
- Subframe vs Spline
- Subframe vs Abstract
- Subframe vs Balsamiq Wireframes
- Subframe vs Canva
- Subframe vs Krea
- Subframe vs Magnific
- Subframe vs Marvel
- Subframe vs Vectr
- Subframe vs Zeplin

