Software · head to head
PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
The short version
- Only Cockroach Labs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: PlanetScale eBS High Availability requires 3-node configuration with replication overhead; Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- They diverge on capability: PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PlanetScale and Cockroach Labs actually diverge.
| Attribute | PlanetScale | Cockroach Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $15/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure) | AWS, GCP, Azure |
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
- Prisma
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
- Kubernetes
Both cover
- Horizontal Scaling
- SOC2
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PlanetScale
- MySQL database hosting with automatic failover and replicationnot Cockroach Labs
- Vitess-based sharding for horizontal scaling across large datasetsnot Cockroach Labs
- Cloud provider flexibility across AWS, GCP, Azure with 60+ regionsnot Cockroach Labs
- Cost-effective database clusters using ARM64 architecture optionsnot Cockroach Labs
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot PlanetScale
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot PlanetScale
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PlanetScale
- EBS High Availability requires 3-node configuration with replication overhead
- EBS Non-HA single-node option lacks redundancy and automatic failover
- Pricing varies by cloud provider and region, requiring queries for specific rates
- ARM64 architecture only available on EBS tier, not Metal deployments
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
Pricing, plan by plan
PlanetScale
$15/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the PlanetScale review.
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Questions people ask
- Is PlanetScale or Cockroach Labs better?
- Neither clearly leads. PlanetScale starts at $15/month and Cockroach Labs at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PlanetScale or Cockroach Labs?
- Cockroach Labs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $15/month for PlanetScale and Free for Cockroach Labs.
- Does PlanetScale or Cockroach Labs run on more platforms?
- PlanetScale runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, GCP, Azure). Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Yes. Cockroach Labs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. PlanetScale starts at $15/month.
- What is PlanetScale best used for?
- PlanetScale is most often used for mysql database hosting with automatic failover and replication, vitess-based sharding for horizontal scaling across large datasets, cloud provider flexibility across aws, gcp, azure with 60+ regions, cost-effective database clusters using arm64 architecture options. Of those, mysql database hosting with automatic failover and replication and vitess-based sharding for horizontal scaling across large datasets are not what Cockroach Labs is typically brought in for.
- What can PlanetScale do that Cockroach Labs cannot?
- PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Connection Pooling. Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. Both handle Horizontal Scaling, SOC2, Cloud deployment.
Related pages
More on PlanetScale
More on Cockroach Labs
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs Airtable
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Elasticsearch
- PlanetScale vs Azure SQL
- PlanetScale vs ClickHouse
- PlanetScale vs Couchbase
- PlanetScale vs DuckDB
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs MariaDB
- PlanetScale vs Oracle Database
- PlanetScale vs Amazon RDS
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Redshift
- PlanetScale vs Apache Druid
- PlanetScale vs Cassandra
- PlanetScale vs CouchDB
- PlanetScale vs Firebolt
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs Azure SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs ClickHouse
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs DuckDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DynamoDB
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Redshift
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Cassandra
- Cockroach Labs vs CouchDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Firebolt


