Softwr

Software · head to head

OCLC WorldShare Management Services vs Koha

OCLC WorldShare Management Services logo

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

Software

Cloud-based library management built on WorldCat

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Koha logo

Koha

Software

The world's first free and open source library system

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Koha has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: OCLC WorldShare Management Services pricing is not published for WorldShare Management Services; the site routes buyers to a Library Services Consultant rather than listing figures; Koha no official vendor exists; hosting, support and development come only from third-party providers in a community directory that explicitly carries no official status
  • They diverge on capability: OCLC WorldShare Management Services covers WorldCat cataloging, Koha covers MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which OCLC WorldShare Management Services and Koha actually diverge.

Attributes where OCLC WorldShare Management Services and Koha differ
AttributeOCLC WorldShare Management ServicesKoha
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelsubscriptionopen-source
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, Mobile, ApiWeb, Api
Founded19671999

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in OCLC WorldShare Management Services

  • WorldCat cataloging
  • Acquisitions and invoicing
  • License management
  • Analytics and reporting
  • Interlibrary loan
  • WorldCat Discovery
  • Mobile circulation
  • Request management

Only in Koha

  • MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging
  • Acquisitions
  • Serials management
  • Patron management
  • OPAC with faceted search
  • Reports and statistics
  • Z39.50 support
  • SIP2 integration

Both cover

  • Circulation management
  • Cloud deployment

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

  • Libraries relying on the shared WorldCat catalog for cataloging and resource sharingnot Koha

Koha

  • Libraries self-hosting an open source integrated library system for cataloging and circulation without vendor licensing feesnot OCLC WorldShare Management Services

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

  • Pricing is not published for WorldShare Management Services; the site routes buyers to a Library Services Consultant rather than listing figures

Koha

  • No official vendor exists; hosting, support and development come only from third-party providers in a community directory that explicitly carries no official status

Pricing, plan by plan

OCLC WorldShare Management Services

On request
  • WMS Standard$undefined/year
    • WorldCat cataloging
    • Circulation management
    • Acquisitions
  • WMS Premium$undefined/year
    • Everything in Standard
    • License Manager
    • Advanced analytics

Koha

Free
  • Self-HostedFree
    • Full ILS functionality
    • Circulation management
    • Cataloging (MARC21/UNIMARC)
  • Hosted (via partners)$150/month
    • Everything in Self-Hosted
    • Managed hosting
    • Professional support

Which should you pick?

Choose OCLC WorldShare Management Services if

  • You need worldcat cataloging.
  • You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
  • You also want acquisitions and invoicing.
OCLC WorldShare Management Services review

Choose Koha if

  • You need marc21/unimarc cataloging.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want acquisitions.
Koha review

Questions people ask

Is OCLC WorldShare Management Services or Koha better?
Neither clearly leads. OCLC WorldShare Management Services starts at On request and Koha at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, OCLC WorldShare Management Services or Koha?
Koha has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for OCLC WorldShare Management Services and Free for Koha.
Does OCLC WorldShare Management Services or Koha run on more platforms?
OCLC WorldShare Management Services runs on Web, Mobile, Api. Koha runs on Web, Api.
Can I use Koha for free?
Yes. Koha has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. OCLC WorldShare Management Services starts at On request.
What is OCLC WorldShare Management Services best used for?
OCLC WorldShare Management Services is most often used for libraries relying on the shared worldcat catalog for cataloging and resource sharing. Of those, libraries relying on the shared worldcat catalog for cataloging and resource sharing is not what Koha is typically brought in for.
What can OCLC WorldShare Management Services do that Koha cannot?
OCLC WorldShare Management Services covers WorldCat cataloging, Acquisitions and invoicing, License management, Analytics and reporting. Koha covers MARC21/UNIMARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management, Patron management. Both handle Circulation management, Cloud deployment.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on OCLC WorldShare Management Services

More on Koha

Keep looking

Other head to heads