Softwr

Technology · head to head

Greenhouse vs InVision

Greenhouse logo

Greenhouse

Technology

Hiring software for growing companies

From
On request
Rated
-
InVision logo

InVision

Design

Digital product design platform

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only InVision has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; InVision service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported
  • They diverge on capability: Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, InVision covers Interactive prototypes.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and InVision actually diverge.

Attributes where Greenhouse and InVision differ
AttributeGreenhouseInVision
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelquoteUnknown
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiWeb, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android
CategoryTechnologyDesign
Founded20122011

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Greenhouse

  • Applicant tracking
  • Interview scheduling
  • Scorecard system
  • Job board posting
  • Candidate CRM
  • Reporting & analytics
  • Offer management
  • EEO compliance

Only in InVision

  • Interactive prototypes
  • Design collaboration
  • Freehand whiteboarding
  • Design system manager
  • Inspect mode
  • Comments & feedback
  • Version control
  • User testing

Both cover

  • Slack
  • SOC2
  • GDPR

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Greenhouse

  • Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot InVision
  • AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot InVision

InVision

  • Prototype creationnot Greenhouse
  • Design feedbacknot Greenhouse
  • Whiteboarding sessionsnot Greenhouse
  • Design handoffnot Greenhouse
  • User testingnot Greenhouse

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Greenhouse

  • Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
  • Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
  • Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
  • Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
  • Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
  • Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox

InVision

  • Service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported
  • Workflow required constant switching between design software (Sketch/Photoshop) and InVision for prototyping, creating inefficiency
  • Performance issues and glitches reported, especially with larger projects
  • Limited development capabilities; required additional hosting and developer support for deployment
  • Could not export working web or mobile applications without additional development

Pricing, plan by plan

Greenhouse

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.

InVision

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the InVision review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Greenhouse if

  • You need applicant tracking.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want interview scheduling.

Choose InVision if

  • You need interactive prototypes.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android.
  • You also want design collaboration.

Questions people ask

Is Greenhouse or InVision better?
Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and InVision at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or InVision?
InVision has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Greenhouse and Free for InVision.
Does Greenhouse or InVision run on more platforms?
Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. InVision runs on Web, Macos, Windows, Ios, Android.
Can I use InVision for free?
Yes. InVision has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
What is Greenhouse best used for?
Greenhouse is most often used for applicant tracking system for structured hiring, ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing. Of those, applicant tracking system for structured hiring and ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing are not what InVision is typically brought in for.
What can Greenhouse do that InVision cannot?
Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Design collaboration, Freehand whiteboarding, Design system manager. Both handle Slack, SOC2, GDPR.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

InVision: Is InVision still active and supported in 2026?

No. InVision announced discontinuation of all services by end of 2024. The platform is no longer available or supported.

Source
InVision: What were InVision's core features?

InVision allowed designers to transform designs into interactive prototypes and mockups for web and mobile. It supported Craft Player for Sketch, Craft Sync for Photoshop, and preview mode in Studio, enabling design-to-prototype workflows.

Source
InVision: What were InVision's pricing plans?

InVision offered Free ($0), Starter ($25/month), Professional ($99/month), and Team plans. Annual billing provided a 10% discount. Free plan included basic prototyping; paid plans added collaboration and file access.

Source
InVision: Why did InVision fail in the market?

InVision's market position was disrupted by Figma, which unified design, prototyping, and collaboration in a single web-based platform. InVision required switching between design software and prototyping, creating friction and reducing competitiveness.

Source
InVision: What integrations did InVision support?

InVision integrated with design tools like Sketch and Photoshop, and supported sharing and collaboration workflows. The platform did not support deployment or direct development integration.

Source

Related pages

Other head to heads