Software · head to head
Fluent Bit vs CloudWatch
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fluent Bit fluent Bit ships over 100 built in plugins against more than 1,000 external plugins available for Fluentd, so fewer integrations exist out of the box; CloudWatch the free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- They diverge on capability: Fluent Bit covers Log collection, CloudWatch covers Metrics collection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fluent Bit and CloudWatch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fluent Bit | CloudWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | usage-based |
| Founded | 2015 | 2006 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fluent Bit
- Log collection
- Lightweight processing
- Data parsing
- Event filtering
Only in CloudWatch
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
- Alarms and notifications
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fluent Bit
- Lightweight log and metric forwarding from containers and edge devicesnot CloudWatch
- Kubernetes node level log collection with a small memory footprintnot CloudWatch
- Filtering and enriching telemetry before shipping it to a backendnot CloudWatch
CloudWatch
- Metrics and log collection for AWS workloadsnot Fluent Bit
- Alarming on thresholds across AWS servicesnot Fluent Bit
- Querying logs with Logs Insightsnot Fluent Bit
- Live tailing logs during an incidentnot Fluent Bit
- Distributed tracing alongside X-Raynot Fluent Bit
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fluent Bit
- Fluent Bit ships over 100 built in plugins against more than 1,000 external plugins available for Fluentd, so fewer integrations exist out of the box
- It is written in C, so extending it beyond the built in plugins means writing C rather than Ruby
- Dependencies are zero only until a plugin requires one
CloudWatch
- The free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- Custom metrics are $0.30 each for the first 10,000, so instrumenting broadly gets expensive before volume discounts apply
- Each custom dashboard beyond the free three is $3 a month
- Alarms are billed at $0.10 per alarm metric a month, with high-resolution alarms costing more
- Log storage beyond the free 5 GB is $0.03 per GB per month on top of the ingestion charge
Pricing, plan by plan
Fluent Bit
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Lightweight processing
- Data parsing
CloudWatch
Free- FreeFree
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Fluent Bit if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want lightweight processing.
Choose CloudWatch if
- You need metrics collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log aggregation.
Questions people ask
- Is Fluent Bit or CloudWatch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fluent Bit starts at Free and CloudWatch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fluent Bit or CloudWatch?
- Fluent Bit starts at Free and CloudWatch at Free.
- Does Fluent Bit or CloudWatch run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Fluent Bit for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Fluent Bit best used for?
- Fluent Bit is most often used for lightweight log and metric forwarding from containers and edge devices, kubernetes node level log collection with a small memory footprint, filtering and enriching telemetry before shipping it to a backend. Of those, lightweight log and metric forwarding from containers and edge devices and kubernetes node level log collection with a small memory footprint are not what CloudWatch is typically brought in for.
- What can Fluent Bit do that CloudWatch cannot?
- Fluent Bit covers Log collection, Lightweight processing, Data parsing, Event filtering. CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Log aggregation, Dashboards, Alarms and notifications. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Fluent Bit vs Elastic Stack
- Fluent Bit vs New Relic
- Fluent Bit vs Datadog Logs
- Fluent Bit vs Coralogix
- Fluent Bit vs Grafana Loki
- Fluent Bit vs Dynatrace
- Fluent Bit vs InfluxDB
- Fluent Bit vs Airbrake
- Fluent Bit vs AppDynamics
- Fluent Bit vs Axiom
- Fluent Bit vs Azure Monitor
- Fluent Bit vs Better Stack
- Fluent Bit vs Bugsnag
- Fluent Bit vs Dynatrace Logs
- Fluent Bit vs Elastic
- Fluent Bit vs Elastic APM
- Fluent Bit vs Elasticsearch Service
- Fluent Bit vs ELK Stack
- CloudWatch vs Elastic Stack
- CloudWatch vs New Relic
- CloudWatch vs Datadog Logs
- CloudWatch vs Coralogix
- CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace
- CloudWatch vs InfluxDB
- CloudWatch vs Airbrake
- CloudWatch vs AppDynamics
- CloudWatch vs Axiom
- CloudWatch vs Azure Monitor
- CloudWatch vs Better Stack
- CloudWatch vs Bugsnag
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace Logs
- CloudWatch vs Elastic
- CloudWatch vs Elastic APM
- CloudWatch vs Elasticsearch Service
- CloudWatch vs ELK Stack


