Log Management · head to head
Airbrake vs Fluent Bit
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Airbrake data retention is 30 days on every plan, including the $799 a month Business tier; Fluent Bit fluent Bit ships over 100 built in plugins against more than 1,000 external plugins available for Fluentd, so fewer integrations exist out of the box
- They diverge on capability: Airbrake covers Error tracking, Fluent Bit covers Log collection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Airbrake and Fluent Bit actually diverge.
| Attribute | Airbrake | Fluent Bit |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Founded | 2008 | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Log Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Airbrake
- Error tracking
- Performance monitoring
- Deploy tracking
- Custom notifications
Only in Fluent Bit
- Log collection
- Lightweight processing
- Data parsing
- Event filtering
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Airbrake
- Error and exception monitoring for web applicationsnot Fluent Bit
- Performance monitoring alongside error trackingnot Fluent Bit
- Alerting a team when a deploy introduces a spike in errorsnot Fluent Bit
- Tracking errors across multiple projects in one accountnot Fluent Bit
Fluent Bit
- Lightweight log and metric forwarding from containers and edge devicesnot Airbrake
- Kubernetes node level log collection with a small memory footprintnot Airbrake
- Filtering and enriching telemetry before shipping it to a backendnot Airbrake
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Airbrake
- Data retention is 30 days on every plan, including the $799 a month Business tier
- The entry plan at $19 a month covers 25,000 errors and 7,500 events
- Errors beyond the plan quota are billed on demand
- Audit logs and spike forgiveness require the Pro tier
- The lowest tier is limited to 1 user and 1 team
Fluent Bit
- Fluent Bit ships over 100 built in plugins against more than 1,000 external plugins available for Fluentd, so fewer integrations exist out of the box
- It is written in C, so extending it beyond the built in plugins means writing C rather than Ruby
- Dependencies are zero only until a plugin requires one
Pricing, plan by plan
Airbrake
Free- FreeFree
- Error tracking
- Performance monitoring
- Deploy tracking
Fluent Bit
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Lightweight processing
- Data parsing
Which should you pick?
Choose Airbrake if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want performance monitoring.
Choose Fluent Bit if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want lightweight processing.
Questions people ask
- Is Airbrake or Fluent Bit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Airbrake starts at Free and Fluent Bit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Airbrake or Fluent Bit?
- Airbrake starts at Free and Fluent Bit at Free.
- Does Airbrake or Fluent Bit run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Airbrake for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Airbrake best used for?
- Airbrake is most often used for error and exception monitoring for web applications, performance monitoring alongside error tracking, alerting a team when a deploy introduces a spike in errors, tracking errors across multiple projects in one account. Of those, error and exception monitoring for web applications and performance monitoring alongside error tracking are not what Fluent Bit is typically brought in for.
- What can Airbrake do that Fluent Bit cannot?
- Airbrake covers Error tracking, Performance monitoring, Deploy tracking, Custom notifications. Fluent Bit covers Log collection, Lightweight processing, Data parsing, Event filtering. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Airbrake vs Elastic Stack
- Airbrake vs New Relic
- Airbrake vs Datadog Logs
- Airbrake vs Coralogix
- Airbrake vs Grafana Loki
- Airbrake vs CloudWatch
- Airbrake vs Dynatrace
- Airbrake vs InfluxDB
- Airbrake vs AppDynamics
- Airbrake vs Axiom
- Airbrake vs Azure Monitor
- Airbrake vs Better Stack
- Airbrake vs Bugsnag
- Airbrake vs Dynatrace Logs
- Airbrake vs Elastic
- Airbrake vs Elastic APM
- Airbrake vs Elasticsearch Service
- Airbrake vs ELK Stack
- Fluent Bit vs Elastic Stack
- Fluent Bit vs New Relic
- Fluent Bit vs Datadog Logs
- Fluent Bit vs Coralogix
- Fluent Bit vs Grafana Loki
- Fluent Bit vs CloudWatch
- Fluent Bit vs Dynatrace
- Fluent Bit vs InfluxDB
- Fluent Bit vs AppDynamics
- Fluent Bit vs Axiom
- Fluent Bit vs Azure Monitor
- Fluent Bit vs Better Stack
- Fluent Bit vs Bugsnag
- Fluent Bit vs Dynatrace Logs
- Fluent Bit vs Elastic
- Fluent Bit vs Elastic APM
- Fluent Bit vs Elasticsearch Service
- Fluent Bit vs ELK Stack


