Software · head to head
Filebeat vs CloudWatch
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Filebeat filebeat ships only as part of the Elastic Stack and has no standalone commercial license; using it in production requires deploying Elasticsearch and typically Kibana alongside it.; CloudWatch the free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- They diverge on capability: Filebeat covers File tailing, CloudWatch covers Metrics collection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Filebeat and CloudWatch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Filebeat | CloudWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | usage-based |
| Founded | 2011 | 2006 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Filebeat
- File tailing
- Log forwarding
- Event parsing
- Input harvesting
Only in CloudWatch
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
- Alarms and notifications
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Filebeat
- Log monitoringnot CloudWatch
- Application performancenot CloudWatch
- Security analyticsnot CloudWatch
- Troubleshootingnot CloudWatch
CloudWatch
- Metrics and log collection for AWS workloadsnot Filebeat
- Alarming on thresholds across AWS servicesnot Filebeat
- Querying logs with Logs Insightsnot Filebeat
- Live tailing logs during an incidentnot Filebeat
- Distributed tracing alongside X-Raynot Filebeat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Filebeat
- Filebeat ships only as part of the Elastic Stack and has no standalone commercial license; using it in production requires deploying Elasticsearch and typically Kibana alongside it.
CloudWatch
- The free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- Custom metrics are $0.30 each for the first 10,000, so instrumenting broadly gets expensive before volume discounts apply
- Each custom dashboard beyond the free three is $3 a month
- Alarms are billed at $0.10 per alarm metric a month, with high-resolution alarms costing more
- Log storage beyond the free 5 GB is $0.03 per GB per month on top of the ingestion charge
Pricing, plan by plan
Filebeat
Free- FreeFree
- File tailing
- Log forwarding
- Event parsing
CloudWatch
Free- FreeFree
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Filebeat if
- You need file tailing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log forwarding.
Choose CloudWatch if
- You need metrics collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log aggregation.
Questions people ask
- Is Filebeat or CloudWatch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Filebeat starts at Free and CloudWatch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Filebeat or CloudWatch?
- Filebeat starts at Free and CloudWatch at Free.
- Does Filebeat or CloudWatch run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Filebeat for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Filebeat best used for?
- Filebeat is most often used for log monitoring, application performance, security analytics, troubleshooting. Of those, log monitoring and application performance are not what CloudWatch is typically brought in for.
- What can Filebeat do that CloudWatch cannot?
- Filebeat covers File tailing, Log forwarding, Event parsing, Input harvesting. CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Log aggregation, Dashboards, Alarms and notifications. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Filebeat vs Elastic Stack
- Filebeat vs New Relic
- Filebeat vs Datadog Logs
- Filebeat vs Coralogix
- Filebeat vs Grafana Loki
- Filebeat vs Dynatrace
- Filebeat vs InfluxDB
- Filebeat vs Airbrake
- Filebeat vs AppDynamics
- Filebeat vs Axiom
- Filebeat vs Azure Monitor
- Filebeat vs Better Stack
- Filebeat vs Bugsnag
- Filebeat vs Dynatrace Logs
- Filebeat vs Elastic
- Filebeat vs Elastic APM
- Filebeat vs Elasticsearch Service
- Filebeat vs ELK Stack
- CloudWatch vs Elastic Stack
- CloudWatch vs New Relic
- CloudWatch vs Datadog Logs
- CloudWatch vs Coralogix
- CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace
- CloudWatch vs InfluxDB
- CloudWatch vs Airbrake
- CloudWatch vs AppDynamics
- CloudWatch vs Axiom
- CloudWatch vs Azure Monitor
- CloudWatch vs Better Stack
- CloudWatch vs Bugsnag
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace Logs
- CloudWatch vs Elastic
- CloudWatch vs Elastic APM
- CloudWatch vs Elasticsearch Service
- CloudWatch vs ELK Stack


