Software · head to head
Evergreen ILS vs CollectiveAccess
CollectiveAccess
Software
Open source collections management and presentation
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Evergreen ILS server installation is supported only on Debian 10, 11, 12 and 13 and Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04; CollectiveAccess requires technical knowledge to install and configure on web servers
- They diverge on capability: Evergreen ILS covers Circulation management, CollectiveAccess covers Configurable cataloging.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Evergreen ILS and CollectiveAccess actually diverge.
| Attribute | Evergreen ILS | CollectiveAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Api | Web |
| Founded | 2006 | 2003 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Evergreen ILS
- Circulation management
- MARC cataloging
- Acquisitions
- Serials management
- OPAC with faceted search
- Patron management
- Offline circulation
- Consortia support
Only in CollectiveAccess
- Configurable cataloging
- Digital asset management
- Relationship mapping
- Provenance tracking
- Loan management
- Exhibition management
- Web publishing (Pawtucket)
- Import/export tools
Both cover
- LDAP
- LDAP
- Role-based access
- Self-hosted deployment
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Evergreen ILS
- Running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation systemnot CollectiveAccess
- Self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branchesnot CollectiveAccess
CollectiveAccess
- Museum collection managementnot Evergreen ILS
- Archival descriptionnot Evergreen ILS
- Digital asset managementnot Evergreen ILS
- Exhibition developmentnot Evergreen ILS
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Evergreen ILS
- Server installation is supported only on Debian 10, 11, 12 and 13 and Ubuntu 22.04 and 24.04
- PostgreSQL 14 is the minimum supported version
- OpenSRF 3.3.0 or later must be installed separately before Evergreen itself
- Installation is a manual multi-service process requiring a dedicated PostgreSQL superuser account and shell access
CollectiveAccess
- Requires technical knowledge to install and configure on web servers
- Limited commercial support compared to proprietary alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
Evergreen ILS
Free- Self-HostedFree
- Full ILS functionality
- Circulation system
- OPAC
- Hosted (via partners)$200/month
- Everything in Self-Hosted
- Managed hosting
- Professional support
CollectiveAccess
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the CollectiveAccess review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Evergreen ILS if
- You need circulation management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Api.
- You also want marc cataloging.
Choose CollectiveAccess if
- You need configurable cataloging.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want digital asset management.
Questions people ask
- Is Evergreen ILS or CollectiveAccess better?
- Neither clearly leads. Evergreen ILS starts at Free and CollectiveAccess at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Evergreen ILS or CollectiveAccess?
- Evergreen ILS starts at Free and CollectiveAccess at Free.
- Does Evergreen ILS or CollectiveAccess run on more platforms?
- Evergreen ILS runs on Web, Desktop, Api. CollectiveAccess runs on Web.
- Can I use Evergreen ILS for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Evergreen ILS best used for?
- Evergreen ILS is most often used for running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation system, self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branches. Of those, running a consortium-scale library catalogue and circulation system and self-hosting an open source integrated library system across multiple branches are not what CollectiveAccess is typically brought in for.
- What can Evergreen ILS do that CollectiveAccess cannot?
- Evergreen ILS covers Circulation management, MARC cataloging, Acquisitions, Serials management. CollectiveAccess covers Configurable cataloging, Digital asset management, Relationship mapping, Provenance tracking. Both handle LDAP, LDAP, Role-based access, Self-hosted deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CollectiveAccess: Is CollectiveAccess free?
Yes, CollectiveAccess is completely free and open-source software licensed under the GNU Public License version 3, with no commercial licensing model.
CollectiveAccess: What does CollectiveAccess do?
CollectiveAccess is web-based collections management software for cataloguing and publishing museum and archival collections, with multi-user support allowing collaboration on metadata entry and collection organization.
CollectiveAccess: Who uses CollectiveAccess?
CollectiveAccess is used by hundreds of institutions from national museums to local history consortia, highly specialized archives, and catalogues raisonnés, including the Munich City Museum which manages over 200,000 objects.
Related pages
More on Evergreen ILS
More on CollectiveAccess
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Evergreen ILS vs ArchivesSpace
- Evergreen ILS vs CONTENTdm
- Evergreen ILS vs Omeka
- Evergreen ILS vs DSpace
- Evergreen ILS vs VuFind
- Evergreen ILS vs Koha
- Evergreen ILS vs Archivematica
- Evergreen ILS vs Axiell Collections
- Evergreen ILS vs Ex Libris Alma
- Evergreen ILS vs FOLIO
- Evergreen ILS vs LibraryThing for Libraries
- Evergreen ILS vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- Evergreen ILS vs SirsiDynix Symphony
- CollectiveAccess vs ArchivesSpace
- CollectiveAccess vs CONTENTdm
- CollectiveAccess vs Omeka
- CollectiveAccess vs DSpace
- CollectiveAccess vs VuFind
- CollectiveAccess vs Koha
- CollectiveAccess vs Archivematica
- CollectiveAccess vs Axiell Collections
- CollectiveAccess vs Ex Libris Alma
- CollectiveAccess vs FOLIO
- CollectiveAccess vs LibraryThing for Libraries
- CollectiveAccess vs OCLC WorldShare Management Services
- CollectiveAccess vs SirsiDynix Symphony

