Softwr

Software · head to head

ChartCo vs deck.gl

ChartCo logo

ChartCo

Software

Integrated maritime compliance platform

From
$300/month
Rated
-
deck.gl logo

deck.gl

Software

WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: ChartCo requires specialized maritime knowledge to fully utilize features; deck.gl deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.
  • They diverge on capability: ChartCo covers Chart management, deck.gl covers Core Functionality.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which ChartCo and deck.gl actually diverge.

Attributes where ChartCo and deck.gl differ
AttributeChartCodeck.gl
Starting price$300/monthOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionfreemium
PlatformsWeb, DesktopWeb
Founded1998Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in ChartCo

  • Chart management
  • Publication updates
  • Compliance tracking
  • Fleet administration
  • ECDIS
  • Fleet management systems
  • Procurement
  • Web support

Only in deck.gl

  • Core Functionality
  • User Interface

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

ChartCo

No use cases recorded yet. See the ChartCo review.

deck.gl

  • GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot ChartCo
  • Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot ChartCo
  • Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot ChartCo
  • High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot ChartCo
  • Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot ChartCo

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

ChartCo

  • Requires specialized maritime knowledge to fully utilize features
  • High cost for maritime-specific software

deck.gl

  • deck.gl is a code library with no vendor-sold plan, no marketplace or app store listing, and no SLA; buyers get community GitHub support only, not a purchasable enterprise tier.

Pricing, plan by plan

ChartCo

$300/month
  • OneOcean$600/month
    • Chart management
    • Publications
    • Compliance tracking

deck.gl

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.

Which should you pick?

Choose ChartCo if

  • You need chart management.
  • You work on Web, Desktop.
  • You also want publication updates.

Choose deck.gl if

  • You need core functionality.
  • You also want user interface.

Questions people ask

Is ChartCo or deck.gl better?
Neither clearly leads. ChartCo starts at $300/month and deck.gl at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, ChartCo or deck.gl?
ChartCo starts at $300/month and deck.gl at On request.
Does ChartCo or deck.gl run on more platforms?
ChartCo runs on Web, Desktop. deck.gl runs on Web.
What can ChartCo do that deck.gl cannot?
ChartCo covers Chart management, Publication updates, Compliance tracking, Fleet administration. deck.gl covers Core Functionality, User Interface.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

ChartCo: What does ChartCo OneOcean provide?

ChartCo OneOcean is an integrated maritime software platform that combines electronic navigational charts, publications, weather data, and compliance tools for voyage planning and maritime safety.

ChartCo: How many vessels use ChartCo PassageManager?

ChartCo's PassageManager software is used by approximately 6,500 vessels worldwide for passage planning and navigational chart management.

ChartCo: Does ChartCo help with environmental compliance?

Yes, ChartCo OneOcean includes EnviroManager for compliance with MARPOL and regional environmental regulations, helping crews manage waste and minimize discharge risks.

Related pages

Other head to heads