Log Management · head to head
Azure Monitor vs PostgreSQL
Azure Monitor
Log Management
Azure's Monitoring and Diagnostics Service
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
PostgreSQL
Database & Data Management
The world's most advanced open source relational database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does; PostgreSQL requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- They diverge on capability: Azure Monitor covers Log collection, PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Monitor and PostgreSQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Monitor | PostgreSQL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix |
| Category | Log Management | Database & Data Management |
| Founded | 2010 | 1996 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in PostgreSQL
- ACID Compliance
- JSON/JSONB Support
- Full-text Search
- Extensibility
- Advanced Indexing
- Partitioning
- Replication
- pgAdmin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot PostgreSQL
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot PostgreSQL
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot PostgreSQL
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot PostgreSQL
- Querying operational data with KQLnot PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
- Transaction processingnot Azure Monitor
- Data storagenot Azure Monitor
- Application backendnot Azure Monitor
- Reportingnot Azure Monitor
- Data analyticsnot Azure Monitor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
PostgreSQL
- Requires manual scaling across multiple machines for very large deployments
- Performance tuning requires deep knowledge of database internals
- No built-in graphical admin interface; command-line tools are primary method
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
PostgreSQL
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PostgreSQL review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Choose PostgreSQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- You also want json/jsonb support.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Monitor or PostgreSQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Monitor starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Monitor or PostgreSQL?
- Azure Monitor starts at Free and PostgreSQL at Free.
- Does Azure Monitor or PostgreSQL run on more platforms?
- Azure Monitor runs on Web, Api. PostgreSQL runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, Unix.
- Can I use Azure Monitor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Monitor best used for?
- Azure Monitor is most often used for collecting logs and metrics from azure resources, alerting on metric thresholds and log queries, application performance monitoring through application insights, long-term log retention for compliance. Of those, collecting logs and metrics from azure resources and alerting on metric thresholds and log queries are not what PostgreSQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Monitor do that PostgreSQL cannot?
- Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards. PostgreSQL covers ACID Compliance, JSON/JSONB Support, Full-text Search, Extensibility.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PostgreSQL: Is PostgreSQL completely free?
Yes. PostgreSQL is completely free and open source with no licensing fees or restrictions on use.
SourcePostgreSQL: What platforms does PostgreSQL run on?
PostgreSQL runs on all major operating systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, BSD, and commercial Unix variants, and has been proven highly scalable managing terabytes to petabytes of data.
SourcePostgreSQL: What procedural languages are supported?
PostgreSQL supports stored functions and procedures in multiple languages including PL/pgSQL, Perl, Python, Tcl, Java, JavaScript, R, and Rust.
SourcePostgreSQL: What is ACID compliance in PostgreSQL?
PostgreSQL has been ACID-compliant since 2001, ensuring data integrity through atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability guarantees for all transactions.
SourcePostgreSQL: Does PostgreSQL support JSON data?
Yes. PostgreSQL supports JSON and JSONB data types for storing and querying JSON documents, along with XML and other document formats.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Monitor
Other head to heads
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Coralogix
- Azure Monitor vs Grafana Loki
- Azure Monitor vs CloudWatch
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace
- Azure Monitor vs InfluxDB
- Azure Monitor vs Airbrake
- Azure Monitor vs AppDynamics
- Azure Monitor vs Axiom
- Azure Monitor vs Better Stack
- Azure Monitor vs Bugsnag
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic APM
- Azure Monitor vs Elasticsearch Service
- Azure Monitor vs ELK Stack
- Azure Monitor vs Cockroach Labs
- Azure Monitor vs Airtable
- Azure Monitor vs Amazon Aurora
- Azure Monitor vs Elasticsearch
- Azure Monitor vs PlanetScale
- Azure Monitor vs Azure SQL
- Azure Monitor vs ClickHouse
- Azure Monitor vs Couchbase
- Azure Monitor vs DuckDB
- Azure Monitor vs DynamoDB
- Azure Monitor vs MariaDB
- Azure Monitor vs Oracle Database
- Azure Monitor vs Amazon RDS
- Azure Monitor vs Amazon Redshift
- Azure Monitor vs Apache Druid
- Azure Monitor vs Cassandra
- Azure Monitor vs CouchDB
- Azure Monitor vs Firebolt
- PostgreSQL vs Elastic Stack
- PostgreSQL vs New Relic
- PostgreSQL vs Datadog Logs
- PostgreSQL vs Coralogix
- PostgreSQL vs Grafana Loki
- PostgreSQL vs CloudWatch
- PostgreSQL vs Dynatrace
- PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB
- PostgreSQL vs Airbrake
- PostgreSQL vs AppDynamics
- PostgreSQL vs Axiom
- PostgreSQL vs Better Stack
- PostgreSQL vs Bugsnag
- PostgreSQL vs Dynatrace Logs
- PostgreSQL vs Elastic
- PostgreSQL vs Elastic APM
- PostgreSQL vs Elasticsearch Service
- PostgreSQL vs ELK Stack
- PostgreSQL vs Cockroach Labs
- PostgreSQL vs Airtable
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Aurora
- PostgreSQL vs Elasticsearch
- PostgreSQL vs PlanetScale
- PostgreSQL vs Azure SQL
- PostgreSQL vs ClickHouse
- PostgreSQL vs Couchbase
- PostgreSQL vs DuckDB
- PostgreSQL vs DynamoDB
- PostgreSQL vs MariaDB
- PostgreSQL vs Oracle Database
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon RDS
- PostgreSQL vs Amazon Redshift
- PostgreSQL vs Apache Druid
- PostgreSQL vs Cassandra
- PostgreSQL vs CouchDB
- PostgreSQL vs Firebolt
