Softwr

Software · head to head

Authorize.net vs PocketBase

A

Authorize.net

Software

We help make it easy to get paid

From
On request
Rated
-
PocketBase logo

PocketBase

Software

Open-source backend with REST API, real-time subscriptions and Admin UI

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only PocketBase has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Authorize.net all-in-One plan charges a $25 monthly gateway fee plus 2.9% + 30 cents per transaction on top of it; PocketBase not recommended for production critical applications until reaching v1.0.0

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Authorize.net and PocketBase actually diverge.

Attributes where Authorize.net and PocketBase differ
AttributeAuthorize.netPocketBase
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelsubscriptionUnknown
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWebLinux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD
FoundedUnknown2021

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Authorize.net

Nothing recorded that PocketBase does not also cover.

Only in PocketBase

  • REST API
  • Real-time subscriptions
  • Admin UI
  • SQLite
  • Webhooks
  • File storage
  • Go support
  • Docker support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Authorize.net

No use cases recorded yet. See the Authorize.net review.

PocketBase

  • Embedded realtime database with REST APInot Authorize.net
  • Backend-as-a-service for single-file deploymentsnot Authorize.net
  • Rapid application development with email/OAuth2 authenticationnot Authorize.net
  • File storage and media attachment managementnot Authorize.net
  • Lightweight alternative to Firebase or traditional backend infrastructurenot Authorize.net
  • Go and JavaScript customisable application frameworknot Authorize.net

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Authorize.net

  • All-in-One plan charges a $25 monthly gateway fee plus 2.9% + 30 cents per transaction on top of it
  • eCheck processing carries its own $10 monthly minimum fee separate from the card processing charges

PocketBase

  • Not recommended for production critical applications until reaching v1.0.0
  • Full backward compatibility not guaranteed before v1.0.0 (breaking changes possible with version updates)
  • Pull requests for new features are disabled due to spam concerns (feature contributions limited)

Pricing, plan by plan

Authorize.net

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Authorize.net review.

PocketBase

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the PocketBase review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Authorize.net if

Nothing in the data separates Authorize.net from PocketBase on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Choose PocketBase if

  • You need rest api.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
  • You also want real-time subscriptions.

Questions people ask

Is Authorize.net or PocketBase better?
Neither clearly leads. Authorize.net starts at On request and PocketBase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Authorize.net or PocketBase?
PocketBase has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Authorize.net and Free for PocketBase.
Does Authorize.net or PocketBase run on more platforms?
Authorize.net runs on Web. PocketBase runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
Can I use PocketBase for free?
Yes. PocketBase has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Authorize.net starts at On request.
What can Authorize.net do that PocketBase cannot?
PocketBase covers REST API, Real-time subscriptions, Admin UI, SQLite.

Related pages

Other head to heads