Softwr

Software · head to head

Assistant.to vs Cockroach Labs

Assistant.to logo

Assistant.to

Software

The easiest way to schedule meetings

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Cockroach Labs logo

Cockroach Labs

Software

The cloud-native distributed SQL database

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Assistant.to no longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it; Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
  • They diverge on capability: Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Assistant.to and Cockroach Labs actually diverge.

Attributes where Assistant.to and Cockroach Labs differ
AttributeAssistant.toCockroach Labs
PlatformsChrome-extensionAWS, GCP, Azure
Founded20142015

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Assistant.to

  • In-email scheduling
  • One-click booking
  • Google Calendar sync
  • Time zone handling
  • Simple interface
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar
  • Chrome-extension support

Only in Cockroach Labs

  • Distributed SQL
  • Automatic Sharding
  • Multi-region Replication
  • Geo-partitioning
  • ACID Transactions
  • Horizontal Scaling
  • Survivability
  • PostgreSQL Compatibility

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Assistant.to

  • Schedulingnot Cockroach Labs
  • Appointment bookingnot Cockroach Labs
  • Time trackingnot Cockroach Labs
  • Resource managementnot Cockroach Labs
  • Team coordinationnot Cockroach Labs

Cockroach Labs

  • Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot Assistant.to
  • Multi-region deployment and failovernot Assistant.to

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Assistant.to

  • No longer an independent product. assistant.to redirects to Cirrus Insight, which absorbed it
  • Its scheduling now sits inside a wider Salesforce-focused sales tool rather than being a standalone add-in

Cockroach Labs

  • Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
  • Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
  • Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
  • Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
  • 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced

Pricing, plan by plan

Assistant.to

Free
  • FreeFree
    • In-email scheduling
    • Basic features
  • Pro$5/month
    • Team features
    • Custom branding
    • Priority support

Cockroach Labs

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Assistant.to if

  • You need in-email scheduling.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Chrome-extension.
  • You also want one-click booking.
Assistant.to review

Choose Cockroach Labs if

  • You need distributed sql.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
  • You also want automatic sharding.
Cockroach Labs review

Questions people ask

Is Assistant.to or Cockroach Labs better?
Neither clearly leads. Assistant.to starts at Free and Cockroach Labs at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Assistant.to or Cockroach Labs?
Assistant.to starts at Free and Cockroach Labs at Free.
Does Assistant.to or Cockroach Labs run on more platforms?
Assistant.to runs on Chrome-extension. Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure.
Can I use Assistant.to for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Assistant.to best used for?
Assistant.to is most often used for scheduling, appointment booking, time tracking, resource management. Of those, scheduling and appointment booking are not what Cockroach Labs is typically brought in for.
What can Assistant.to do that Cockroach Labs cannot?
Assistant.to covers In-email scheduling, One-click booking, Google Calendar sync, Time zone handling. Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Assistant.to

More on Cockroach Labs

Keep looking

Other head to heads