Software · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs Grafana Loki
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; Grafana Loki grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and Grafana Loki actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | Grafana Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Platforms | Web | Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support) |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in Grafana Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- LogQL language
- Cost-effective
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Api support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot Grafana Loki
- Data warehousingnot Grafana Loki
- Real-time analyticsnot Grafana Loki
- Reportingnot Grafana Loki
- Machine learningnot Grafana Loki
Grafana Loki
- Cost-sensitive organisations deploying Kubernetes and Prometheus ecosystemsnot Amazon Redshift
- Teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environmentsnot Amazon Redshift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
Grafana Loki
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- Open-source version requires self-hosting all infrastructure including storage and scaling
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
Grafana Loki
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Grafana Loki review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Choose Grafana Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or Grafana Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Grafana Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or Grafana Loki?
- Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Grafana Loki at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift or Grafana Loki run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift runs on Web. Grafana Loki runs on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Grafana Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that Grafana Loki cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration. Grafana Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, LogQL language, Cost-effective. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourceAmazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourceAmazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
More on Grafana Loki
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs Airtable
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon Aurora
- Amazon Redshift vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Redshift vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs Couchbase
- Amazon Redshift vs DuckDB
- Amazon Redshift vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Redshift vs MariaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Redshift vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs Cassandra
- Amazon Redshift vs CouchDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- Amazon Redshift vs Elastic Stack
- Amazon Redshift vs New Relic
- Amazon Redshift vs Datadog Logs
- Amazon Redshift vs Coralogix
- Amazon Redshift vs CloudWatch
- Amazon Redshift vs Dynatrace
- Amazon Redshift vs InfluxDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Airbrake
- Amazon Redshift vs AppDynamics
- Amazon Redshift vs Axiom
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure Monitor
- Amazon Redshift vs Better Stack
- Amazon Redshift vs Bugsnag
- Amazon Redshift vs Dynatrace Logs
- Amazon Redshift vs Elastic
- Amazon Redshift vs Elastic APM
- Amazon Redshift vs Elasticsearch Service
- Amazon Redshift vs ELK Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Cockroach Labs
- Grafana Loki vs PostgreSQL
- Grafana Loki vs Airtable
- Grafana Loki vs Amazon Aurora
- Grafana Loki vs Elasticsearch
- Grafana Loki vs PlanetScale
- Grafana Loki vs Azure SQL
- Grafana Loki vs ClickHouse
- Grafana Loki vs Couchbase
- Grafana Loki vs DuckDB
- Grafana Loki vs DynamoDB
- Grafana Loki vs MariaDB
- Grafana Loki vs Oracle Database
- Grafana Loki vs Amazon RDS
- Grafana Loki vs Apache Druid
- Grafana Loki vs Cassandra
- Grafana Loki vs CouchDB
- Grafana Loki vs Firebolt
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic
- Grafana Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Coralogix
- Grafana Loki vs CloudWatch
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace
- Grafana Loki vs InfluxDB
- Grafana Loki vs Airbrake
- Grafana Loki vs AppDynamics
- Grafana Loki vs Axiom
- Grafana Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Grafana Loki vs Better Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Bugsnag
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic APM
- Grafana Loki vs Elasticsearch Service
- Grafana Loki vs ELK Stack


