All industries · head to head
Airtable vs Focus@Will

Airtable
All industries
Create apps that perfectly fit your team's needs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Focus@Will
Productivity
Music and sounds designed to enhance focus and productivity
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Airtable hitting a plan limit blocks adding records or attachments entirely until you upgrade, rather than degrading gracefully; Focus@Will the App Store listing (seller Dulcetta Inc) states the free trial is limited to 7 days, after which a paid subscription is required to continue using the music and features
- They diverge on capability: Airtable covers Spreadsheet-database hybrid, Focus@Will covers Curated focus music.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Airtable and Focus@Will actually diverge.
| Attribute | Airtable | Focus@Will |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Desktop | Web, IOS, Android, MacOS, Windows |
| Category | All industries | Productivity |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Airtable
- Spreadsheet-database hybrid
- Custom views
- Automation
- Forms
- Integrations
- Mobile apps
- Real-time collaboration
- API access
Only in Focus@Will
- Curated focus music
- Multiple music channels
- Built-in focus timer
- Focus statistics
- Different music genres
- Offline access
- Cross-platform sync
- Volume control
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Airtable
- Structured team databases with grid, calendar and kanban viewsnot Focus@Will
- Lightweight internal tools built on shared recordsnot Focus@Will
- Automations between Airtable and other systemsnot Focus@Will
- Sharing read-only views with collaborators, who are not chargednot Focus@Will
- Collecting submissions through forms without paying for a seatnot Focus@Will
Focus@Will
- Productivitynot Airtable
- Collaborationnot Airtable
- Task managementnot Airtable
- Organizationnot Airtable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Airtable
- Hitting a plan limit blocks adding records or attachments entirely until you upgrade, rather than degrading gracefully
- Team is $20 per user per month and Business $45, both at the annual rate
- Automation and API usage are capped by plan
- Enterprise Scale pricing is not published
Focus@Will
- The App Store listing (seller Dulcetta Inc) states the free trial is limited to 7 days, after which a paid subscription is required to continue using the music and features
- The same listing states a 30 day money-back guarantee applies to the subscription, implying no refund is available after that window
Pricing, plan by plan
Airtable
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited bases
- 1,000 records per base
- Up to 5 editors
- Team$20/month per editor annual
- 50,000 records per base
- Unlimited automations
- API access
- Business$45/month per editor annual
- 125,000 records per base
- Advanced permissions
- Priority support
- Enterprise Scale$null/custom
- 500,000+ records per base
- Custom SLA
- Dedicated support
Focus@Will
Free- FreeFree
- Limited access to music
- Basic 25-min timer
- Ads
- Basic$4.95/month
- Unlimited music access
- Custom timers
- No ads
- Pro$9.95/month
- Everything in Basic
- Advanced analytics
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose Airtable if
- You need spreadsheet-database hybrid.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Desktop.
- You also want custom views.
Choose Focus@Will if
- You need curated focus music.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, IOS, Android, MacOS, Windows.
- You also want multiple music channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Airtable or Focus@Will better?
- Neither clearly leads. Airtable starts at Free and Focus@Will at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Airtable or Focus@Will?
- Airtable starts at Free and Focus@Will at Free.
- Does Airtable or Focus@Will run on more platforms?
- Airtable runs on Web, iOS, Android, Desktop. Focus@Will runs on Web, IOS, Android, MacOS, Windows.
- Can I use Airtable for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Airtable best used for?
- Airtable is most often used for structured team databases with grid, calendar and kanban views, lightweight internal tools built on shared records, automations between airtable and other systems, sharing read-only views with collaborators, who are not charged. Of those, structured team databases with grid, calendar and kanban views and lightweight internal tools built on shared records are not what Focus@Will is typically brought in for.
- What can Airtable do that Focus@Will cannot?
- Airtable covers Spreadsheet-database hybrid, Custom views, Automation, Forms. Focus@Will covers Curated focus music, Multiple music channels, Built-in focus timer, Focus statistics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Airtable: Is there a free Airtable plan and what does it include?
Yes, Airtable's Free plan is indefinite with unlimited bases, 1,000 records per base, up to 5 editors, 1 GB storage per base, 100 automation runs per month, and core features like Interface Designer and mobile apps.
SourceAirtable: How does Airtable handle permissions and viewers?
Airtable charges per editor only. Read-only viewers, form submitters, and people accessing share links are free on every plan, making it cost-effective for large viewing audiences.
SourceAirtable: What are Airtable's record limits?
Free plan has 1,000 records per base, Team plan has 50,000, Business plan has 125,000, and Enterprise Scale has 500,000+ records. Performance degrades past 100,000 records in a single base.
SourceAirtable: Can Airtable integrate with other tools like Slack?
Yes, Airtable integrates with Slack via Zapier or Make.com, allowing automation like sending Slack messages when records are created or updated. Airtable also has a native API for direct integrations.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Airtable vs Cockroach Labs
- Airtable vs PostgreSQL
- Airtable vs Amazon Aurora
- Airtable vs Elasticsearch
- Airtable vs PlanetScale
- Airtable vs Azure SQL
- Airtable vs ClickHouse
- Airtable vs Couchbase
- Airtable vs DuckDB
- Airtable vs DynamoDB
- Airtable vs MariaDB
- Airtable vs Oracle Database
- Airtable vs Amazon RDS
- Airtable vs Amazon Redshift
- Airtable vs Apache Druid
- Airtable vs Cassandra
- Airtable vs CouchDB
- Airtable vs Firebolt
- Airtable vs Todoist
- Airtable vs Things 3
- Airtable vs OmniFocus 3
- Airtable vs Brain.fm
- Airtable vs TickTick
- Airtable vs Akiflow
- Airtable vs Any.do
- Airtable vs Forest
- Airtable vs Google Workspace
- Airtable vs Hubstaff
- Airtable vs Remember The Milk
- Airtable vs Structured
- Airtable vs Tana
- Airtable vs Time Doctor
- Airtable vs 7-Zip
- Airtable vs Bear
- Airtable vs Bear Notes
- Airtable vs BoldSign
- Focus@Will vs Cockroach Labs
- Focus@Will vs PostgreSQL
- Focus@Will vs Amazon Aurora
- Focus@Will vs Elasticsearch
- Focus@Will vs PlanetScale
- Focus@Will vs Azure SQL
- Focus@Will vs ClickHouse
- Focus@Will vs Couchbase
- Focus@Will vs DuckDB
- Focus@Will vs DynamoDB
- Focus@Will vs MariaDB
- Focus@Will vs Oracle Database
- Focus@Will vs Amazon RDS
- Focus@Will vs Amazon Redshift
- Focus@Will vs Apache Druid
- Focus@Will vs Cassandra
- Focus@Will vs CouchDB
- Focus@Will vs Firebolt
- Focus@Will vs Todoist
- Focus@Will vs Things 3
- Focus@Will vs OmniFocus 3
- Focus@Will vs Brain.fm
- Focus@Will vs TickTick
- Focus@Will vs Akiflow
- Focus@Will vs Any.do
- Focus@Will vs Forest
- Focus@Will vs Google Workspace
- Focus@Will vs Hubstaff
- Focus@Will vs Remember The Milk
- Focus@Will vs Structured
- Focus@Will vs Tana
- Focus@Will vs Time Doctor
- Focus@Will vs 7-Zip
- Focus@Will vs Bear
- Focus@Will vs Bear Notes
- Focus@Will vs BoldSign
