
Paw
API Management
Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing
- macOS
The directory
42 products matching your filters. Each one described on the same fields, so two tools can be read against each other rather than against their own marketing.
Showing 25–42 of 42

API Management
Full-featured REST client for macOS with powerful scripting and testing

API Management
Modern TypeScript-first headless CMS with REST and GraphQL APIs

API Management
Open-source backend with REST API, real-time subscriptions and Admin UI
API Management
Observe, govern, and secure every AI interaction across your enterprise

API Management
API marketplace and management platform for discovering and publishing APIs
API Management
VSCode extension for making HTTP requests and testing REST APIs

API Management
Headless CMS with real-time collaborative editing and structured content APIs

API Management
Full lifecycle API management and integration platform

API Management
API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices

API Management
API design, documentation, and governance platform
API Management
API design and documentation platform for building, testing, and managing APIs
API Management
API specification and documentation framework using OpenAPI standard

API Management
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension

API Management
Cloud-native API management for digital business

API Management
Open-source API gateway and API management platform

API Management
Complete API management platform for designing and managing APIs
Head to head
Pairings from this slice of the directory, each one checked by two reviewers who agreed a buyer would weigh the two against each other.
Browse another way
How this works
Pricing, platforms and feature lists are taken from each vendor's own pages. Limitations, answered questions and alternatives are researched separately and carry a source URL on the page that states them. Every product is described on the same fields, so two tools can be read against each other rather than against their own marketing.
Because we did not collect any. Softwr hosts no reviews, and a rating aggregated from somewhere else is not ours to publish as though it were an assessment we made. What is shown instead is what a tool costs, where it runs, and what it is concretely bad at.
A researcher proposes them, then two independent reviewers judge one question each: would a buyer evaluating this product seriously consider that one instead. 225 of 1,841 candidates failed and were deleted, including a font inspector matched to a dark mode extension. Only pairings that survived both rounds are published.
Not to be listed, and not to rank. Every position and filter result on this page is unpaid. A vendor can buy the sponsored panel above the results, which is labelled as such and sits outside the list rather than at the top of it: remove it and this page shows the same products in the same order. Where a link earns a commission that is disclosed on the page carrying it.
Prices and plan limits move without notice, so treat anything with a number on it as a starting point and check the vendor before you buy. Where a claim could go stale it carries the source it came from, which is the fastest way to tell.
Something missing here?
Anyone can submit a tool. A person reads every submission, checks the pricing against the vendor’s own page, and nothing is published until it passes.