AR/VR & Metaverse · head to head
Varjo vs ARKit
The short version
- Only ARKit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Varjo high cost enterprise XR solutions; ARKit iOS-only platform, not available for Android or other operating systems
- They diverge on capability: Varjo covers Human-eye resolution, ARKit covers World tracking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Varjo and ARKit actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (AR/VR & Metaverse).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Varjo
- Human-eye resolution
- Mixed reality
- Eye tracking
- Hand tracking
- Unity
- Unreal
- OpenXR
- SteamVR
Only in ARKit
- World tracking
- Face tracking
- Body tracking
- LiDAR support
- RealityKit
- Reality Composer
- SceneKit
- Ar support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Varjo
- Military flight simulation and pilot trainingnot ARKit
- Vehicle operation and weapons trainingnot ARKit
- Maritime navigation trainingnot ARKit
- High-fidelity professional VR simulationnot ARKit
ARKit
- VR Gamingnot Varjo
- AR Marketingnot Varjo
- Virtual Trainingnot Varjo
- 3D Visualizationnot Varjo
- Immersive Experiencesnot Varjo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Varjo
- High cost enterprise XR solutions
- Specialized for military and simulation training use cases only
ARKit
- iOS-only platform, not available for Android or other operating systems
- Location-based AR accuracy limited to 3-5 meters, insufficient for precise applications
- Cannot handle very fast motion capture
- Accuracy varies with lighting conditions and surface characteristics
- Requires iOS 11 or later and specific device hardware
Pricing, plan by plan
Varjo
$2495/one-time- Varjo XR-4$3990/one-time
- Human-eye resolution
- Mixed reality
- Eye tracking
ARKit
Free- FreeFree
- Full SDK
- Documentation
- Sample code
Which should you pick?
Choose Varjo if
- You need human-eye resolution.
- You work on XR headsets, Windows.
- You also want mixed reality.
Choose ARKit if
- You need world tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, iPadOS, macOS, visionOS.
- You also want face tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Varjo or ARKit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Varjo starts at $2495/one-time and ARKit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Varjo or ARKit?
- ARKit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2495/one-time for Varjo and Free for ARKit.
- Does Varjo or ARKit run on more platforms?
- Varjo runs on XR headsets, Windows. ARKit runs on iOS, iPadOS, macOS, visionOS.
- Can I use ARKit for free?
- Yes. ARKit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Varjo starts at $2495/one-time.
- What is Varjo best used for?
- Varjo is most often used for military flight simulation and pilot training, vehicle operation and weapons training, maritime navigation training, high-fidelity professional vr simulation. Of those, military flight simulation and pilot training and vehicle operation and weapons training are not what ARKit is typically brought in for.
- What can Varjo do that ARKit cannot?
- Varjo covers Human-eye resolution, Mixed reality, Eye tracking, Hand tracking. ARKit covers World tracking, Face tracking, Body tracking, LiDAR support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ARKit: Is ARKit free to use?
Yes, ARKit is free to use. It is included in Apple's iOS SDK and requires only Xcode and a Mac to start building AR apps. There are no licensing fees or subscription costs.
SourceARKit: What iOS devices support ARKit?
ARKit is supported on iPhone 6s and later, iPad Pro models, and the latest iPad models. It requires iOS 11 or later. Apple Vision Pro also supports ARKit with enhanced capabilities through visionOS.
SourceARKit: Can ARKit work offline?
ARKit can function offline for tracking and scene understanding since these operations run locally on the device. However, multiplayer AR features and cloud-based object detection require internet connectivity.
SourceARKit: Does ARKit integrate with game engines?
Yes, ARKit integrates with Unity through the Unity ARKit Plugin and with Unreal Engine. Developers can also use it with Metal, SceneKit, and Apple's RealityKit framework.
SourceARKit: What are ARKit's limitations with location-based AR?
ARKit's location-based positioning has accuracy limitations. Image-based positioning is primarily useful in urban areas, and beacon-based navigation provides accuracy of 3-5 meters, which is insufficient for precise AR applications requiring 1-meter accuracy or better.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Varjo vs ARCore
- Varjo vs Meta Quest
- Varjo vs Apple Vision Pro
- Varjo vs Unity AR Foundation
- Varjo vs HTC Vive
- Varjo vs 8th Wall
- Varjo vs Lens Studio
- Varjo vs Vuforia
- Varjo vs A-Frame
- Varjo vs Babylon.js
- Varjo vs Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Varjo vs Niantic Lightship
- Varjo vs PlayStation VR2
- Varjo vs Spark AR Studio
- Varjo vs TikTok Effect House
- Varjo vs Gravity Sketch
- Varjo vs Instagram AR Effects
- Varjo vs Magic Leap 2
- ARKit vs ARCore
- ARKit vs Meta Quest
- ARKit vs Apple Vision Pro
- ARKit vs Unity AR Foundation
- ARKit vs HTC Vive
- ARKit vs 8th Wall
- ARKit vs Lens Studio
- ARKit vs Vuforia
- ARKit vs A-Frame
- ARKit vs Babylon.js
- ARKit vs Microsoft HoloLens 2
- ARKit vs Niantic Lightship
- ARKit vs PlayStation VR2
- ARKit vs Spark AR Studio
- ARKit vs TikTok Effect House
- ARKit vs Gravity Sketch
- ARKit vs Instagram AR Effects
- ARKit vs Magic Leap 2


