Software · head to head
Sematext vs Elasticsearch Service
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Sematext the $5 Basic plan caps ingestion at 500 MB a day and retains logs for 7 days; Elasticsearch Service the 99.95 percent monthly uptime SLA applies only to the Platinum and Enterprise subscription tiers
- They diverge on capability: Sematext covers Log aggregation, Elasticsearch Service covers Full-text search.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sematext and Elasticsearch Service actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sematext | Elasticsearch Service |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sematext
- Log aggregation
- APM
- Metrics monitoring
- Anomaly detection
Only in Elasticsearch Service
- Full-text search
- Scalability
- High availability
- Security
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sematext
- Centralised log management and search across servicesnot Elasticsearch Service
- Infrastructure and application monitoring alongside logsnot Elasticsearch Service
Elasticsearch Service
- Managed Elasticsearch without running the clusternot Sematext
- Log and observability data storage and searchnot Sematext
- Full-text search behind an applicationnot Sematext
- Deployments needing a specific cloud region across AWS, Azure or GCPnot Sematext
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sematext
- The $5 Basic plan caps ingestion at 500 MB a day and retains logs for 7 days
- Ingestion and storage are billed on separate meters, at $0.10 per GB received and $0.15 per GB stored
- Retention is a plan property rather than a setting, so keeping logs longer means moving tier
- The published pricing page renders Standard and Pro figures from unresolved template placeholders, so only the Basic numbers are actually readable
Elasticsearch Service
- The 99.95 percent monthly uptime SLA applies only to the Platinum and Enterprise subscription tiers
- Serverless does not yet support traffic filtering, cross-project search or bring-your-own-key encryption
- Serverless runs on AWS, GCP and Azure only, against 60 regions for the hosted option
- Per-unit prices are not published; hosted is resource-based and serverless usage-based
Pricing, plan by plan
Sematext
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- APM
- Metrics monitoring
Elasticsearch Service
Free- FreeFree
- Full-text search
- Scalability
- High availability
Which should you pick?
Choose Sematext if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want apm.
Choose Elasticsearch Service if
- You need full-text search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want scalability.
Questions people ask
- Is Sematext or Elasticsearch Service better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sematext starts at Free and Elasticsearch Service at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sematext or Elasticsearch Service?
- Sematext starts at Free and Elasticsearch Service at Free.
- Does Sematext or Elasticsearch Service run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Sematext for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Sematext best used for?
- Sematext is most often used for centralised log management and search across services, infrastructure and application monitoring alongside logs. Of those, centralised log management and search across services and infrastructure and application monitoring alongside logs are not what Elasticsearch Service is typically brought in for.
- What can Sematext do that Elasticsearch Service cannot?
- Sematext covers Log aggregation, APM, Metrics monitoring, Anomaly detection. Elasticsearch Service covers Full-text search, Scalability, High availability, Security. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Elasticsearch Service
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Sematext vs Elastic Stack
- Sematext vs New Relic
- Sematext vs Datadog Logs
- Sematext vs Coralogix
- Sematext vs Grafana Loki
- Sematext vs CloudWatch
- Sematext vs Dynatrace
- Sematext vs InfluxDB
- Sematext vs Airbrake
- Sematext vs AppDynamics
- Sematext vs Axiom
- Sematext vs Azure Monitor
- Sematext vs Better Stack
- Sematext vs Bugsnag
- Sematext vs Dynatrace Logs
- Sematext vs Elastic
- Sematext vs Elastic APM
- Sematext vs ELK Stack
- Elasticsearch Service vs Elastic Stack
- Elasticsearch Service vs New Relic
- Elasticsearch Service vs Datadog Logs
- Elasticsearch Service vs Coralogix
- Elasticsearch Service vs Grafana Loki
- Elasticsearch Service vs CloudWatch
- Elasticsearch Service vs Dynatrace
- Elasticsearch Service vs InfluxDB
- Elasticsearch Service vs Airbrake
- Elasticsearch Service vs AppDynamics
- Elasticsearch Service vs Axiom
- Elasticsearch Service vs Azure Monitor
- Elasticsearch Service vs Better Stack
- Elasticsearch Service vs Bugsnag
- Elasticsearch Service vs Dynatrace Logs
- Elasticsearch Service vs Elastic
- Elasticsearch Service vs Elastic APM
- Elasticsearch Service vs ELK Stack


