Software · head to head
MineRP vs FLAC3D
F
FLAC3D
Software
3D finite difference software for geotechnical engineering
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: MineRP minerp.com 301 redirects to epiroc.com's mine planning product line, confirming MineRP was absorbed into Epiroc; the product is no longer sold as an independently branded platform and buyers must now evaluate it inside Epiroc's mining portfolio.; FLAC3D the FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- They diverge on capability: MineRP covers Resource planning, FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MineRP and FLAC3D actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MineRP
- Resource planning
- Production scheduling
- Equipment management
- Constraint optimization
- Performance tracking
- Vulcan
- Surpac
- ERP systems
Only in FLAC3D
- 3D finite difference modeling
- Stress-strain analysis
- Dynamic analysis
- Coupled flow analysis
- Mining-specific features
- GeoStudio
- AutoCAD
- Leapfrog
Both cover
- Windows support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MineRP
- Resource planningnot FLAC3D
- Production schedulingnot FLAC3D
- Equipment optimizationnot FLAC3D
- Capacity planningnot FLAC3D
- Operations managementnot FLAC3D
FLAC3D
- Three dimensional continuum modelling of soil and rock behaviournot MineRP
- Analysing underground excavation and mine stability including cavingnot MineRP
- Coupled thermal, dynamic and creep analysis of geotechnical structuresnot MineRP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MineRP
- minerp.com 301 redirects to epiroc.com's mine planning product line, confirming MineRP was absorbed into Epiroc; the product is no longer sold as an independently branded platform and buyers must now evaluate it inside Epiroc's mining portfolio.
FLAC3D
- The FLAC3D product page publishes no price and routes buyers to a quote request or an external software store
- Advanced capabilities including Dynamics, Thermal, Creep and IMASS are optional modules sold separately from the base licence
- Licence portability depends on a physical USB key or a web licence managed centrally, rather than a simple sign in
- One licence permits only two simultaneous instances on the same computer
Pricing, plan by plan
MineRP
On request- MineRP Professional$19000/year
- Resource planning
- Production scheduling
- Constraint management
FLAC3D
On request- FLAC3D Professional$22000/year
- 3D finite difference analysis
- Slope stability
- Mine design
Which should you pick?
Choose MineRP if
- You need resource planning.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want production scheduling.
Choose FLAC3D if
- You need 3d finite difference modeling.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want stress-strain analysis.
Questions people ask
- Is MineRP or FLAC3D better?
- Neither clearly leads. MineRP starts at On request and FLAC3D at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MineRP or FLAC3D?
- MineRP starts at On request and FLAC3D at On request.
- Does MineRP or FLAC3D run on more platforms?
- MineRP runs on Windows, Web. FLAC3D runs on Windows, Linux.
- What is MineRP best used for?
- MineRP is most often used for resource planning, production scheduling, equipment optimization, capacity planning. Of those, resource planning and production scheduling are not what FLAC3D is typically brought in for.
- What can MineRP do that FLAC3D cannot?
- MineRP covers Resource planning, Production scheduling, Equipment management, Constraint optimization. FLAC3D covers 3D finite difference modeling, Stress-strain analysis, Dynamic analysis, Coupled flow analysis. Both handle Windows support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- MineRP vs Caterpillar MineStar
- MineRP vs Leapfrog Geo
- MineRP vs Deswik Suite
- MineRP vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- MineRP vs Datamine
- MineRP vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- MineRP vs Micromine
- MineRP vs Datamine Studio RM
- MineRP vs Maptek I-Site
- MineRP vs Minemax
- MineRP vs Promine
- MineRP vs Surpac
- MineRP vs Trimble Mining
- MineRP vs Vulcan
- MineRP vs 3DEC
- MineRP vs acQuire GIM Suite
- MineRP vs Carlson Mining
- MineRP vs Cority EHS
- FLAC3D vs Caterpillar MineStar
- FLAC3D vs Leapfrog Geo
- FLAC3D vs Deswik Suite
- FLAC3D vs Dassault Systemes GEOVIA
- FLAC3D vs Datamine
- FLAC3D vs Hexagon PPM Mining
- FLAC3D vs Micromine
- FLAC3D vs Datamine Studio RM
- FLAC3D vs Maptek I-Site
- FLAC3D vs Minemax
- FLAC3D vs Promine
- FLAC3D vs Surpac
- FLAC3D vs Trimble Mining
- FLAC3D vs Vulcan
- FLAC3D vs 3DEC
- FLAC3D vs acQuire GIM Suite
- FLAC3D vs Carlson Mining
- FLAC3D vs Cority EHS

