Software · head to head
Microsoft Power Automate vs Thunder Client
Microsoft Power Automate
Software
Automate tasks across cloud and on-premises apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Thunder Client
Software
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Microsoft Power Automate free plan limited to 750 flow runs/month and standard connectors only; premium connectors require paid plans; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Microsoft Power Automate covers Automated flows, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Microsoft Power Automate and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Microsoft Power Automate | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, Desktop | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | 2016 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Microsoft Power Automate
- Automated flows
- Instant flows
- Scheduled flows
- Desktop automation
- Process mining
- Business process flows
- Approval workflows
- 500+ connectors
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- GitHub
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Microsoft Power Automate
- Workflow Automationnot Thunder Client
- Data Integrationnot Thunder Client
- Process Automationnot Thunder Client
- App Integrationnot Thunder Client
- API Connectivitynot Thunder Client
Thunder Client
- API Developmentnot Microsoft Power Automate
- API Gatewaynot Microsoft Power Automate
- API Testingnot Microsoft Power Automate
- API Documentationnot Microsoft Power Automate
- Microservicesnot Microsoft Power Automate
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Microsoft Power Automate
- Free plan limited to 750 flow runs/month and standard connectors only; premium connectors require paid plans
- Not suitable for long-running workflows; can fail unexpectedly without warning
- Limited to simple linear logic; fails with complex workflows involving multiple stakeholders
- Tasks cannot automate at scale when requiring more than approximately 60 users
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Microsoft Power Automate
Free- FreeFree
- 750 flow runs/month
- Standard connectors only
- Basic cloud flows
- Premium$15/user/month
- Cloud flows (DPA)
- Attended RPA
- 250 MB Dataverse database
- Process$150/bot/month
- Unattended automation
- Cloud and desktop flows
- 50 MB Dataverse database
- Hosted Process$215/bot/month
- Microsoft-managed virtual machine
- Unattended automation
- Same Dataverse entitlements as Process plan
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Microsoft Power Automate if
- You need automated flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Desktop.
- You also want instant flows.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is Microsoft Power Automate or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Microsoft Power Automate starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Microsoft Power Automate or Thunder Client?
- Microsoft Power Automate starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
- Does Microsoft Power Automate or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Microsoft Power Automate runs on Web, Cloud, Desktop. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Microsoft Power Automate for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Microsoft Power Automate best used for?
- Microsoft Power Automate is most often used for workflow automation, data integration, process automation, app integration. Of those, workflow automation and data integration are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
- What can Microsoft Power Automate do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Microsoft Power Automate covers Automated flows, Instant flows, Scheduled flows, Desktop automation. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Microsoft Power Automate: Is Power Automate included with Microsoft 365?
Yes. If you have an eligible Microsoft 365 subscription, you can use Power Automate at no extra cost for flows relying only on standard connectors (SharePoint, Outlook, Teams). Premium connectors (Salesforce, SAP, Oracle) require paid plans.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: How many flow runs are allowed on the free plan?
Power Automate's free tier (included with Microsoft 365) is limited to 750 flow runs per month and standard connectors only. Out of 900+ total connectors, the free plan only includes Microsoft ecosystem apps and limited third-party apps.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: What's the difference between Premium and Process plans?
Premium ($15/user/month) provides attended automation with cloud flows and standard RPA. Process plan ($150/bot/month) enables unattended automation where bots run without human intervention on virtual machines for high-volume, repetitive tasks.
SourceMicrosoft Power Automate: Does Power Automate support long-running workflows?
No. Power Automate is not suitable for long-lasting workflows because they can run without warning and fail unexpectedly. The platform is built for linear, branching logic (if-then) rather than complex, multi-step business processes involving multiple stakeholders.
SourceRelated pages
More on Microsoft Power Automate
More on Thunder Client
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Microsoft Power Automate vs n8n
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Zapier
- Microsoft Power Automate vs MuleSoft
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Parabola
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Zapier Plus
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Jitterbit
- Microsoft Power Automate vs mParticle
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Paragon
- Microsoft Power Automate vs RudderStack
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Workato
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Airbyte
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Automate.io
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Boomi
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Browser Use
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Browserbase
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Celigo
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Census
- Microsoft Power Automate vs CrewAI
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Appwrite
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Hasura
- Microsoft Power Automate vs PocketBase
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Sanity
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Apigee
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Bruno
- Microsoft Power Automate vs KeystoneJS
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Parse Server
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Stoplight
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Strapi
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Microsoft Power Automate vs WSO2 API Manager
- Microsoft Power Automate vs 3scale
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Akana
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Asyncapi
- Microsoft Power Automate vs AWS API Gateway
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Backendless
- Thunder Client vs n8n
- Thunder Client vs Zapier
- Thunder Client vs MuleSoft
- Thunder Client vs Parabola
- Thunder Client vs Zapier Plus
- Thunder Client vs Jitterbit
- Thunder Client vs mParticle
- Thunder Client vs Paragon
- Thunder Client vs RudderStack
- Thunder Client vs Workato
- Thunder Client vs Airbyte
- Thunder Client vs Automate.io
- Thunder Client vs Boomi
- Thunder Client vs Browser Use
- Thunder Client vs Browserbase
- Thunder Client vs Celigo
- Thunder Client vs Census
- Thunder Client vs CrewAI
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Apigee
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs KeystoneJS
- Thunder Client vs Parse Server
- Thunder Client vs Stoplight
- Thunder Client vs Strapi
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs WSO2 API Manager
- Thunder Client vs 3scale
- Thunder Client vs Akana
- Thunder Client vs Asyncapi
- Thunder Client vs AWS API Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Thunder Client vs Backendless
