Log Management · head to head
Graylog Plus vs Grafana Loki
The short version
- Only Grafana Loki has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Graylog Plus pricing is not published on the product pages; Grafana Loki grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- They diverge on capability: Graylog Plus covers SIEM capabilities, Grafana Loki covers Label-based indexing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Graylog Plus and Grafana Loki actually diverge.
| Attribute | Graylog Plus | Grafana Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support) |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Log Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Graylog Plus
- SIEM capabilities
- Advanced parsing
- Compliance
Only in Grafana Loki
- Label-based indexing
- LogQL language
- Cost-effective
Both cover
- Log aggregation
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Graylog Plus
- Centralised log collection, search and analysisnot Grafana Loki
- SIEM and threat detection through Graylog Securitynot Grafana Loki
- Self-hosting log management on your own infrastructurenot Grafana Loki
- API security monitoringnot Grafana Loki
- Compliance reporting from retained log datanot Grafana Loki
Grafana Loki
- Cost-sensitive organisations deploying Kubernetes and Prometheus ecosystemsnot Graylog Plus
- Teams needing index-free log aggregation for high-volume environmentsnot Graylog Plus
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Graylog Plus
- Pricing is not published on the product pages
- Split across several editions, Graylog Open, Enterprise, Security and API Security, so log management and SIEM are separate purchases
- The open edition is source-available rather than fully open source, and the guided setup, prebuilt content and AI assistance are Enterprise features
Grafana Loki
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro plan includes only 30-day retention; retention beyond 30 days requires Enterprise plan with minimum $25,000 annual commitment
- Open-source version requires self-hosting all infrastructure including storage and scaling
Pricing, plan by plan
Graylog Plus
On request- Starter$undefined/month
- Log aggregation
- SIEM capabilities
- Advanced parsing
Grafana Loki
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Grafana Loki review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Graylog Plus if
- You need siem capabilities.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want advanced parsing.
Choose Grafana Loki if
- You need label-based indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- You also want logql language.
Questions people ask
- Is Graylog Plus or Grafana Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Graylog Plus starts at On request and Grafana Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Graylog Plus or Grafana Loki?
- Grafana Loki has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Graylog Plus and Free for Grafana Loki.
- Does Graylog Plus or Grafana Loki run on more platforms?
- Graylog Plus runs on Web, Api. Grafana Loki runs on Self-hosted (open source), Managed (Grafana Cloud Logs), Enterprise (self-managed with support).
- Can I use Grafana Loki for free?
- Yes. Grafana Loki has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Graylog Plus starts at On request.
- What is Graylog Plus best used for?
- Graylog Plus is most often used for centralised log collection, search and analysis, siem and threat detection through graylog security, self-hosting log management on your own infrastructure, api security monitoring. Of those, centralised log collection, search and analysis and siem and threat detection through graylog security are not what Grafana Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Graylog Plus do that Grafana Loki cannot?
- Graylog Plus covers SIEM capabilities, Advanced parsing, Compliance. Grafana Loki covers Label-based indexing, LogQL language, Cost-effective. Both handle Log aggregation, API, Webhooks, REST.
Related pages
More on Graylog Plus
More on Grafana Loki
Other head to heads
- Graylog Plus vs Elastic Stack
- Graylog Plus vs New Relic
- Graylog Plus vs Datadog Logs
- Graylog Plus vs Coralogix
- Graylog Plus vs CloudWatch
- Graylog Plus vs Dynatrace
- Graylog Plus vs InfluxDB
- Graylog Plus vs Airbrake
- Graylog Plus vs AppDynamics
- Graylog Plus vs Axiom
- Graylog Plus vs Azure Monitor
- Graylog Plus vs Better Stack
- Graylog Plus vs Bugsnag
- Graylog Plus vs Dynatrace Logs
- Graylog Plus vs Elastic
- Graylog Plus vs Elastic APM
- Graylog Plus vs Elasticsearch Service
- Graylog Plus vs ELK Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Grafana Loki vs New Relic
- Grafana Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Coralogix
- Grafana Loki vs CloudWatch
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace
- Grafana Loki vs InfluxDB
- Grafana Loki vs Airbrake
- Grafana Loki vs AppDynamics
- Grafana Loki vs Axiom
- Grafana Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Grafana Loki vs Better Stack
- Grafana Loki vs Bugsnag
- Grafana Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic
- Grafana Loki vs Elastic APM
- Grafana Loki vs Elasticsearch Service
- Grafana Loki vs ELK Stack


