Software · head to head
Elastic APM vs CloudWatch
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Elastic APM pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service; CloudWatch the free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- They diverge on capability: Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring, CloudWatch covers Metrics collection.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Elastic APM and CloudWatch actually diverge.
| Attribute | Elastic APM | CloudWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | usage-based |
| Founded | 2011 | 2006 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Elastic APM
- Performance monitoring
- Error tracking
- Transaction tracing
- Custom metrics
Only in CloudWatch
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
- Alarms and notifications
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Elastic APM
- Distributed tracing across microservicesnot CloudWatch
- Auto-instrumenting Java, .NET, Python, Go, Node.js, Ruby, PHP and C++ servicesnot CloudWatch
- OpenTelemetry-native collection through the Elastic distributionsnot CloudWatch
- Correlating latency and errors with machine learningnot CloudWatch
- Monitoring LLM calls alongside application tracesnot CloudWatch
CloudWatch
- Metrics and log collection for AWS workloadsnot Elastic APM
- Alarming on thresholds across AWS servicesnot Elastic APM
- Querying logs with Logs Insightsnot Elastic APM
- Live tailing logs during an incidentnot Elastic APM
- Distributed tracing alongside X-Raynot Elastic APM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Elastic APM
- Pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service
- Self-managed deployment means running and scaling Elasticsearch yourself
- Serverless does not carry every capability the hosted option does
CloudWatch
- The free tier covers 5 GB of log ingestion and 10 custom metrics a month, after which log ingestion is $0.50 per GB from 5 to 30 GB
- Custom metrics are $0.30 each for the first 10,000, so instrumenting broadly gets expensive before volume discounts apply
- Each custom dashboard beyond the free three is $3 a month
- Alarms are billed at $0.10 per alarm metric a month, with high-resolution alarms costing more
- Log storage beyond the free 5 GB is $0.03 per GB per month on top of the ingestion charge
Pricing, plan by plan
Elastic APM
Free- FreeFree
- Performance monitoring
- Error tracking
- Transaction tracing
CloudWatch
Free- FreeFree
- Metrics collection
- Log aggregation
- Dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Elastic APM if
- You need performance monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want error tracking.
Choose CloudWatch if
- You need metrics collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log aggregation.
Questions people ask
- Is Elastic APM or CloudWatch better?
- Neither clearly leads. Elastic APM starts at Free and CloudWatch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Elastic APM or CloudWatch?
- Elastic APM starts at Free and CloudWatch at Free.
- Does Elastic APM or CloudWatch run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Elastic APM for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Elastic APM best used for?
- Elastic APM is most often used for distributed tracing across microservices, auto-instrumenting java, .net, python, go, node.js, ruby, php and c++ services, opentelemetry-native collection through the elastic distributions, correlating latency and errors with machine learning. Of those, distributed tracing across microservices and auto-instrumenting java, .net, python, go, node.js, ruby, php and c++ services are not what CloudWatch is typically brought in for.
- What can Elastic APM do that CloudWatch cannot?
- Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring, Error tracking, Transaction tracing, Custom metrics. CloudWatch covers Metrics collection, Log aggregation, Dashboards, Alarms and notifications. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Elastic APM
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Elastic APM vs Elastic Stack
- Elastic APM vs New Relic
- Elastic APM vs Datadog Logs
- Elastic APM vs Coralogix
- Elastic APM vs Grafana Loki
- Elastic APM vs Dynatrace
- Elastic APM vs InfluxDB
- Elastic APM vs Airbrake
- Elastic APM vs AppDynamics
- Elastic APM vs Axiom
- Elastic APM vs Azure Monitor
- Elastic APM vs Better Stack
- Elastic APM vs Bugsnag
- Elastic APM vs Dynatrace Logs
- Elastic APM vs Elastic
- Elastic APM vs Elasticsearch Service
- Elastic APM vs ELK Stack
- CloudWatch vs Elastic Stack
- CloudWatch vs New Relic
- CloudWatch vs Datadog Logs
- CloudWatch vs Coralogix
- CloudWatch vs Grafana Loki
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace
- CloudWatch vs InfluxDB
- CloudWatch vs Airbrake
- CloudWatch vs AppDynamics
- CloudWatch vs Axiom
- CloudWatch vs Azure Monitor
- CloudWatch vs Better Stack
- CloudWatch vs Bugsnag
- CloudWatch vs Dynatrace Logs
- CloudWatch vs Elastic
- CloudWatch vs Elasticsearch Service
- CloudWatch vs ELK Stack


