Software · head to head
DynamoDB vs Flock

DynamoDB
Software
Fast, flexible NoSQL database service for any scale
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Flock has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DynamoDB noSQL-only; does not support complex relational queries or SQL joins; Flock the Starter plan only makes the most recent 10,000 messages searchable and caps public channels at 10
- They diverge on capability: DynamoDB covers Single-digit Millisecond Latency, Flock covers Team chat.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DynamoDB and Flock actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DynamoDB
- Single-digit Millisecond Latency
- Serverless
- Auto-scaling
- Global Tables
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Encryption
- Streams
- Lambda
Only in Flock
- Team chat
- Channels
- Threads
- File sharing
- Polls
- Integrations
- Mobile apps
- Slack
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DynamoDB
- High-scale, variable-workload applicationsnot Flock
- Mobile and IoT device backendsnot Flock
- Real-time analytics and dashboardsnot Flock
- Multi-region, globally distributed applicationsnot Flock
Flock
- Team messaging with channels, direct messages and file sharingnot DynamoDB
- Running polls, to-dos and reminders inside a chat workspacenot DynamoDB
- Video conferencing and screen sharing for small teamsnot DynamoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DynamoDB
- NoSQL-only; does not support complex relational queries or SQL joins
- Limited query flexibility; requires thinking in terms of keys and indexes rather than ad-hoc queries
Flock
- The Starter plan only makes the most recent 10,000 messages searchable and caps public channels at 10
- Starter storage is 5 GB for the entire team, against 10 GB per member on Pro and 20 GB per member on Enterprise
- Starter allows a single team admin and a single approved domain
- Group video calls and screen sharing require the Pro plan; Starter is limited to 1-1 video calls
- Group video calls are capped at 20 participants even on Enterprise
- Single Sign-On and Active Directory sync are Enterprise only
- Enterprise is quote only, with no published rate, and is positioned for organisations with 100 or more members
- Unlimited auto-join and announcement channels require Enterprise; Starter and Pro get one of each
Pricing, plan by plan
DynamoDB
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the DynamoDB review.
Flock
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited chats
- Channels
- File sharing
- Pro$5/month
- Everything in Free
- Advanced search
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose DynamoDB if
- You need single-digit millisecond latency.
- You work on AWS.
- You also want serverless.
Choose Flock if
- You need team chat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, Macos, Ios, Android.
- You also want channels.
Questions people ask
- Is DynamoDB or Flock better?
- Neither clearly leads. DynamoDB starts at On request and Flock at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DynamoDB or Flock?
- Flock has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for DynamoDB and Free for Flock.
- Does DynamoDB or Flock run on more platforms?
- DynamoDB runs on AWS. Flock runs on Web, Windows, Macos, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Flock for free?
- Yes. Flock has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. DynamoDB starts at On request.
- What is DynamoDB best used for?
- DynamoDB is most often used for high-scale, variable-workload applications, mobile and iot device backends, real-time analytics and dashboards, multi-region, globally distributed applications. Of those, high-scale, variable-workload applications and mobile and iot device backends are not what Flock is typically brought in for.
- What can DynamoDB do that Flock cannot?
- DynamoDB covers Single-digit Millisecond Latency, Serverless, Auto-scaling, Global Tables. Flock covers Team chat, Channels, Threads, File sharing. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- DynamoDB vs Cockroach Labs
- DynamoDB vs PostgreSQL
- DynamoDB vs Airtable
- DynamoDB vs Amazon Aurora
- DynamoDB vs Elasticsearch
- DynamoDB vs PlanetScale
- DynamoDB vs Azure SQL
- DynamoDB vs ClickHouse
- DynamoDB vs Couchbase
- DynamoDB vs DuckDB
- DynamoDB vs MariaDB
- DynamoDB vs Oracle Database
- DynamoDB vs Amazon RDS
- DynamoDB vs Amazon Redshift
- DynamoDB vs Apache Druid
- DynamoDB vs Cassandra
- DynamoDB vs CouchDB
- DynamoDB vs Firebolt
- DynamoDB vs Zoom
- DynamoDB vs Microsoft Teams
- DynamoDB vs Loom
- DynamoDB vs RingCentral Video
- DynamoDB vs Slack
- DynamoDB vs Telegram
- DynamoDB vs Webex by Cisco
- DynamoDB vs Chanty
- DynamoDB vs Chatwork
- DynamoDB vs Google Chat
- DynamoDB vs Grasshopper
- DynamoDB vs Lark
- DynamoDB vs Mattermost
- DynamoDB vs Quo
- DynamoDB vs Rocket.Chat
- DynamoDB vs Signal
- DynamoDB vs TeamViewer
- DynamoDB vs Textline
- Flock vs Cockroach Labs
- Flock vs PostgreSQL
- Flock vs Airtable
- Flock vs Amazon Aurora
- Flock vs Elasticsearch
- Flock vs PlanetScale
- Flock vs Azure SQL
- Flock vs ClickHouse
- Flock vs Couchbase
- Flock vs DuckDB
- Flock vs MariaDB
- Flock vs Oracle Database
- Flock vs Amazon RDS
- Flock vs Amazon Redshift
- Flock vs Apache Druid
- Flock vs Cassandra
- Flock vs CouchDB
- Flock vs Firebolt
- Flock vs Zoom
- Flock vs Microsoft Teams
- Flock vs Loom
- Flock vs RingCentral Video
- Flock vs Slack
- Flock vs Telegram
- Flock vs Webex by Cisco
- Flock vs Chanty
- Flock vs Chatwork
- Flock vs Google Chat
- Flock vs Grasshopper
- Flock vs Lark
- Flock vs Mattermost
- Flock vs Quo
- Flock vs Rocket.Chat
- Flock vs Signal
- Flock vs TeamViewer
- Flock vs Textline

