Software · head to head
Amazon Aurora vs Flock

Amazon Aurora
Software
MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Aurora aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services; Flock the Starter plan only makes the most recent 10,000 messages searchable and caps public channels at 10
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, Flock covers Team chat.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Aurora and Flock actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Aurora | Flock |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Platforms | AWS Cloud | Web, Windows, Macos, Ios, Android |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Aurora
- MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible
- 5x MySQL Performance
- Auto-scaling Storage
- Global Database
- Serverless v2
- Multi-master
- Fault Tolerant
- AWS Lambda
Only in Flock
- Team chat
- Channels
- Threads
- File sharing
- Polls
- Integrations
- Mobile apps
- Slack
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Aurora
- Transaction processingnot Flock
- Data storagenot Flock
- Application backendnot Flock
- Reportingnot Flock
- Data analyticsnot Flock
Flock
- Team messaging with channels, direct messages and file sharingnot Amazon Aurora
- Running polls, to-dos and reminders inside a chat workspacenot Amazon Aurora
- Video conferencing and screen sharing for small teamsnot Amazon Aurora
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Aurora
- Aurora requires AWS ecosystem knowledge and integration with other AWS services
- Pricing can become expensive with high-traffic applications using many read replicas
- Limited support for non-relational data types compared to NoSQL alternatives
Flock
- The Starter plan only makes the most recent 10,000 messages searchable and caps public channels at 10
- Starter storage is 5 GB for the entire team, against 10 GB per member on Pro and 20 GB per member on Enterprise
- Starter allows a single team admin and a single approved domain
- Group video calls and screen sharing require the Pro plan; Starter is limited to 1-1 video calls
- Group video calls are capped at 20 participants even on Enterprise
- Single Sign-On and Active Directory sync are Enterprise only
- Enterprise is quote only, with no published rate, and is positioned for organisations with 100 or more members
- Unlimited auto-join and announcement channels require Enterprise; Starter and Pro get one of each
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Aurora
Free- Serverless v2$0.12/hour
- Auto-scaling
- Pay per ACU
- Instant scaling
- Provisioned$29/month
- Dedicated instances
- Predictable performance
- Reserved capacity
Flock
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited chats
- Channels
- File sharing
- Pro$5/month
- Everything in Free
- Advanced search
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Aurora if
- You need mysql/postgresql compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS Cloud.
- You also want 5x mysql performance.
Choose Flock if
- You need team chat.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, Macos, Ios, Android.
- You also want channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Aurora or Flock better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Aurora starts at Free and Flock at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Aurora or Flock?
- Amazon Aurora starts at Free and Flock at Free.
- Does Amazon Aurora or Flock run on more platforms?
- Amazon Aurora runs on AWS Cloud. Flock runs on Web, Windows, Macos, Ios, Android.
- Can I use Amazon Aurora for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Aurora best used for?
- Amazon Aurora is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what Flock is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Aurora do that Flock cannot?
- Amazon Aurora covers MySQL/PostgreSQL Compatible, 5x MySQL Performance, Auto-scaling Storage, Global Database. Flock covers Team chat, Channels, Threads, File sharing. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Aurora: Is Amazon Aurora compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL?
Yes, Amazon Aurora offers MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility with full compatibility to their open-source counterparts, allowing you to migrate existing databases with standard tools.
SourceAmazon Aurora: What uptime SLA does Amazon Aurora provide?
Aurora is designed for up to 99.99% single-region uptime and 99.999% multi-region uptime with automatic failover.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How much does Amazon Aurora cost?
Aurora uses serverless, usage-based pricing where you pay only for consumed capacity. Typical pricing ranges from $50-70 per month for minimal setups to $400-600 per month for small production clusters.
SourceAmazon Aurora: Can Amazon Aurora scale automatically?
Yes, Aurora automatically scales to match workload demands without performance degradation, supporting both read and write scaling.
SourceAmazon Aurora: How many read replicas does Aurora support?
Aurora supports up to 15 low-latency read replicas for distributing read traffic across your application.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Aurora
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon Aurora vs Cockroach Labs
- Amazon Aurora vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Aurora vs Airtable
- Amazon Aurora vs Elasticsearch
- Amazon Aurora vs PlanetScale
- Amazon Aurora vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Aurora vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Aurora vs Couchbase
- Amazon Aurora vs DuckDB
- Amazon Aurora vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Aurora vs MariaDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Oracle Database
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon RDS
- Amazon Aurora vs Amazon Redshift
- Amazon Aurora vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Aurora vs Cassandra
- Amazon Aurora vs CouchDB
- Amazon Aurora vs Firebolt
- Amazon Aurora vs Zoom
- Amazon Aurora vs Microsoft Teams
- Amazon Aurora vs Loom
- Amazon Aurora vs RingCentral Video
- Amazon Aurora vs Slack
- Amazon Aurora vs Telegram
- Amazon Aurora vs Webex by Cisco
- Amazon Aurora vs Chanty
- Amazon Aurora vs Chatwork
- Amazon Aurora vs Google Chat
- Amazon Aurora vs Grasshopper
- Amazon Aurora vs Lark
- Amazon Aurora vs Mattermost
- Amazon Aurora vs Quo
- Amazon Aurora vs Rocket.Chat
- Amazon Aurora vs Signal
- Amazon Aurora vs TeamViewer
- Amazon Aurora vs Textline
- Flock vs Cockroach Labs
- Flock vs PostgreSQL
- Flock vs Airtable
- Flock vs Elasticsearch
- Flock vs PlanetScale
- Flock vs Azure SQL
- Flock vs ClickHouse
- Flock vs Couchbase
- Flock vs DuckDB
- Flock vs DynamoDB
- Flock vs MariaDB
- Flock vs Oracle Database
- Flock vs Amazon RDS
- Flock vs Amazon Redshift
- Flock vs Apache Druid
- Flock vs Cassandra
- Flock vs CouchDB
- Flock vs Firebolt
- Flock vs Zoom
- Flock vs Microsoft Teams
- Flock vs Loom
- Flock vs RingCentral Video
- Flock vs Slack
- Flock vs Telegram
- Flock vs Webex by Cisco
- Flock vs Chanty
- Flock vs Chatwork
- Flock vs Google Chat
- Flock vs Grasshopper
- Flock vs Lark
- Flock vs Mattermost
- Flock vs Quo
- Flock vs Rocket.Chat
- Flock vs Signal
- Flock vs TeamViewer
- Flock vs Textline

