Maps · head to head
deck.gl vs Nominatim

deck.gl
Maps
WebGL-powered framework for visual exploratory data analysis of large datasets, developed by
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Nominatim
Maps
Open-source geocoding tool for OpenStreetMap data, providing address search and reverse geocoding capabilities
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only deck.gl has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: deck.gl open source framework with no commercial support tier available; support relies on community and GitHub issues; Nominatim the public API allows an absolute maximum of 1 request per second
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which deck.gl and Nominatim actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in deck.gl
Nothing recorded that Nominatim does not also cover.
Only in Nominatim
Nothing recorded that deck.gl does not also cover.
Both cover
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
deck.gl
- GPU-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browsernot Nominatim
- Composing map overlays from reusable layersnot Nominatim
- Adding data layers on top of Google Maps or Mapbox basemapsnot Nominatim
- High-precision plotting using 64-bit GPU computationnot Nominatim
- Use from React or plain JavaScriptnot Nominatim
Nominatim
- Geocoding and reverse geocoding servicesnot deck.gl
- Address lookup and location searchnot deck.gl
- OpenStreetMap-based geolocation datanot deck.gl
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
deck.gl
- Open source framework with no commercial support tier available; support relies on community and GitHub issues
- Maintained by community contributors (vis.gl contributors), not by a dedicated company support team
Nominatim
- The public API allows an absolute maximum of 1 request per second
- Bulk geocoding must run in a single thread and cannot be distributed across machines
- Scripts running longer than a day or on a schedule are limited to 4 requests per minute
- Autocomplete search against the public API is explicitly prohibited
- Systematic queries such as grid based reverse lookups and complete data downloads are prohibited
- Reselling geocoding results or acting as an API intermediary is prohibited
- Every request must send a valid HTTP Referer or User-Agent identifying the application, and default library headers are rejected
- Results must be cached client side, and repeated identical queries can lead to blocking
- Attribution to OpenStreetMap under ODbL must be displayed
Pricing, plan by plan
deck.gl
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the deck.gl review.
Nominatim
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Nominatim review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Nominatim if
Nothing in the data separates Nominatim from deck.gl on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is deck.gl or Nominatim better?
- Neither clearly leads. deck.gl starts at Free and Nominatim at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, deck.gl or Nominatim?
- deck.gl has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for deck.gl and On request for Nominatim.
- Does deck.gl or Nominatim run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use deck.gl for free?
- Yes. deck.gl has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Nominatim starts at On request.
- What is deck.gl best used for?
- deck.gl is most often used for gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser, composing map overlays from reusable layers, adding data layers on top of google maps or mapbox basemaps, high-precision plotting using 64-bit gpu computation. Of those, gpu-accelerated visualisation of large geospatial datasets in the browser and composing map overlays from reusable layers are not what Nominatim is typically brought in for.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
deck.gl: How much does deck.gl cost?
deck.gl is completely free to use. It is an open source framework maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and community contributors. The project is available on GitHub for anyone to use, modify, and contribute to without cost.
SourceNominatim: Is Nominatim free?
Nominatim is open source software built on OpenStreetMap data. It appears to be free to use, though commercial usage may require separate licensing or terms. Check the project repository or contact support for clarity on licensing.
Sourcedeck.gl: Is deck.gl open source?
Yes, deck.gl is open source software maintained by the OpenJS Foundation and vis.gl contributors. The source code is publicly available, and the framework can be used freely in any project.
SourceNominatim: What is Nominatim's pricing model?
Nominatim does not publish a standard pricing model on its website. As open source software, it is available for free, but commercial or large-scale deployments may require reviewing their licensing terms or contacting project maintainers.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- deck.gl vs Lonboard
- deck.gl vs Apple Maps
- deck.gl vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- deck.gl vs Mapbox
- deck.gl vs Google Maps Platform
- deck.gl vs HERE Technologies
- deck.gl vs Fused
- deck.gl vs Kepler.gl
- deck.gl vs Potree
- deck.gl vs QGIS
- deck.gl vs Esri ArcGIS
- deck.gl vs Cesium ion
- deck.gl vs Trailforks
- deck.gl vs AllTrails
- deck.gl vs Bing Maps
- deck.gl vs Citymapper
- deck.gl vs ArcGIS Survey123
- deck.gl vs LocationIQ
- deck.gl vs Geoapify
- deck.gl vs OpenRouteService
- deck.gl vs OSRM
- deck.gl vs PositionStack
- deck.gl vs Stadia Maps
- deck.gl vs GraphHopper
- deck.gl vs Leica Infinity
- deck.gl vs Mapillary
- deck.gl vs MapQuest
- deck.gl vs MAPS.ME
- deck.gl vs Google Maps
- Nominatim vs Lonboard
- Nominatim vs Apple Maps
- Nominatim vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Nominatim vs Mapbox
- Nominatim vs Google Maps Platform
- Nominatim vs HERE Technologies
- Nominatim vs Fused
- Nominatim vs Kepler.gl
- Nominatim vs Potree
- Nominatim vs QGIS
- Nominatim vs Esri ArcGIS
- Nominatim vs Cesium ion
- Nominatim vs Trailforks
- Nominatim vs AllTrails
- Nominatim vs Bing Maps
- Nominatim vs Citymapper
- Nominatim vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Nominatim vs LocationIQ
- Nominatim vs Geoapify
- Nominatim vs OpenRouteService
- Nominatim vs OSRM
- Nominatim vs PositionStack
- Nominatim vs Stadia Maps
- Nominatim vs GraphHopper
- Nominatim vs Leica Infinity
- Nominatim vs Mapillary
- Nominatim vs MapQuest
- Nominatim vs MAPS.ME
- Nominatim vs Google Maps
