Software · head to head
Cypress vs Hasura

Cypress
Software
JavaScript end-to-end testing framework with browser-based runner and cloud service
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Hasura
Software
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cypress limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported; Hasura database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cypress and Hasura actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cypress
Nothing recorded that Hasura does not also cover.
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Webhooks
- REST APIs
- Cloud support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cypress
- End-to-end testing for modern JavaScript web applicationsnot Hasura
- Continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test executionnot Hasura
- Visual regression testing and accessibility verificationnot Hasura
- Flaky test detection and eliminationnot Hasura
- Team collaboration on test maintenance and debuggingnot Hasura
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot Cypress
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot Cypress
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot Cypress
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot Cypress
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cypress
- Limited to web applications; mobile and desktop app testing not supported
- Free tier capped at 500 test results/month; insufficient for most development teams
- Paid features (flake detection, analytics) not included in free tier
- JavaScript/TypeScript focused; less suitable for polyglot organisations
Hasura
- Database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
Pricing, plan by plan
Cypress
Free- Starter (Free)Free
- 500 test results/month
- 100 prompt executions/month
- Parallelisation
- Team$67/month
- 120k test results/year
- 9k prompt executions/year
- Flake detection
- Business$267/month
- 120k test results/year
- 24k prompt executions/year
- Spec prioritisation
- Enterprise$null/custom
- 1.8M test results/year
- 60k prompt executions/year
- Unlimited users
Hasura
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Hasura review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Questions people ask
- Is Cypress or Hasura better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cypress starts at Free and Hasura at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cypress or Hasura?
- Cypress starts at Free and Hasura at Free.
- Does Cypress or Hasura run on more platforms?
- Cypress runs on macOS, Windows, Linux. Hasura runs on Web.
- Can I use Cypress for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cypress best used for?
- Cypress is most often used for end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications, continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution, visual regression testing and accessibility verification, flaky test detection and elimination. Of those, end-to-end testing for modern javascript web applications and continuous integration pipelines with parallelised test execution are not what Hasura is typically brought in for.
- What can Cypress do that Hasura cannot?
- Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Cypress vs Insomnia
- Cypress vs BrowserStack
- Cypress vs BugHerd
- Cypress vs CircleCI
- Cypress vs GitHub Actions
- Cypress vs Playwright
- Cypress vs Zephyr Scale
- Cypress vs Appwrite
- Cypress vs PocketBase
- Cypress vs Sanity
- Cypress vs Apigee
- Cypress vs Bruno
- Cypress vs KeystoneJS
- Cypress vs Parse Server
- Cypress vs Stoplight
- Cypress vs Strapi
- Cypress vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Cypress vs Thunder Client
- Cypress vs WSO2 API Manager
- Cypress vs 3scale
- Cypress vs Akana
- Cypress vs Asyncapi
- Cypress vs AWS API Gateway
- Cypress vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Cypress vs Backendless
- Hasura vs Insomnia
- Hasura vs BrowserStack
- Hasura vs BugHerd
- Hasura vs CircleCI
- Hasura vs GitHub Actions
- Hasura vs Playwright
- Hasura vs Zephyr Scale
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs PocketBase
- Hasura vs Sanity
- Hasura vs Apigee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Hasura vs Thunder Client
- Hasura vs WSO2 API Manager
- Hasura vs 3scale
- Hasura vs Akana
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs AWS API Gateway
- Hasura vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Hasura vs Backendless
