Software · head to head
CircleCI vs Hasura

Hasura
Software
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CircleCI the free plan covers 6,000 build minutes and 5 active users a month; Hasura database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CircleCI and Hasura actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CircleCI
Nothing recorded that Hasura does not also cover.
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Webhooks
- REST APIs
- Cloud support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CircleCI
- Continuous integration pipelines for application codenot Hasura
- Parallel test execution across containersnot Hasura
- Docker-based builds with layer cachingnot Hasura
- Deployment pipelines with approval gatesnot Hasura
- Self-hosted runners for private infrastructurenot Hasura
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot CircleCI
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot CircleCI
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot CircleCI
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot CircleCI
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CircleCI
- The free plan covers 6,000 build minutes and 5 active users a month
- Active users are billed at $15 each beyond the included five, and an active user is anyone who commits to a project
- Everything runs on credits, so compute, Docker layer caching at 200 credits a job and IP ranges at 450 credits per GB all draw from the same pool
- Network and storage overage costs 420 credits per GB
- Free credits expire monthly with no rollover, and paid credits expire after a year
- Scale is annual billing only
Hasura
- Database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
Pricing, plan by plan
CircleCI
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the CircleCI review.
Hasura
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Hasura review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Questions people ask
- Is CircleCI or Hasura better?
- Neither clearly leads. CircleCI starts at Free and Hasura at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CircleCI or Hasura?
- CircleCI starts at Free and Hasura at Free.
- Does CircleCI or Hasura run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use CircleCI for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CircleCI best used for?
- CircleCI is most often used for continuous integration pipelines for application code, parallel test execution across containers, docker-based builds with layer caching, deployment pipelines with approval gates. Of those, continuous integration pipelines for application code and parallel test execution across containers are not what Hasura is typically brought in for.
- What can CircleCI do that Hasura cannot?
- Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- CircleCI vs Insomnia
- CircleCI vs BrowserStack
- CircleCI vs BugHerd
- CircleCI vs Cypress
- CircleCI vs GitHub Actions
- CircleCI vs Playwright
- CircleCI vs Zephyr Scale
- CircleCI vs Appwrite
- CircleCI vs PocketBase
- CircleCI vs Sanity
- CircleCI vs Apigee
- CircleCI vs Bruno
- CircleCI vs KeystoneJS
- CircleCI vs Parse Server
- CircleCI vs Stoplight
- CircleCI vs Strapi
- CircleCI vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- CircleCI vs Thunder Client
- CircleCI vs WSO2 API Manager
- CircleCI vs 3scale
- CircleCI vs Akana
- CircleCI vs Asyncapi
- CircleCI vs AWS API Gateway
- CircleCI vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- CircleCI vs Backendless
- Hasura vs Insomnia
- Hasura vs BrowserStack
- Hasura vs BugHerd
- Hasura vs Cypress
- Hasura vs GitHub Actions
- Hasura vs Playwright
- Hasura vs Zephyr Scale
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs PocketBase
- Hasura vs Sanity
- Hasura vs Apigee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Hasura vs Thunder Client
- Hasura vs WSO2 API Manager
- Hasura vs 3scale
- Hasura vs Akana
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs AWS API Gateway
- Hasura vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Hasura vs Backendless

