Database & Data Management · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs Fathom

Cockroach Labs
Database & Data Management
The cloud-native distributed SQL database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); Fathom team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Fathom covers Auto-recording.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and Fathom actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams |
| Category | Database & Data Management | AI Tools |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in Fathom
- Auto-recording
- AI summaries
- Transcription
- Highlight clips
- Zoom
- Google Meet
- HubSpot
- Salesforce
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot Fathom
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot Fathom
Fathom
- AI-powered meeting transcription and automatic note-taking for sales teams and professionalsnot Cockroach Labs
- Meeting analysis with AI scorecards and action item generation that syncs to CRMsnot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
Fathom
- Team plan requires minimum 2 users; cannot purchase single seat at team pricing
- CRM field sync and deal view summaries available only on Business plan ($34/user/month) and above
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
Fathom
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fathom review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose Fathom if
- You need auto-recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams.
- You also want ai summaries.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or Fathom better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Fathom at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or Fathom?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Fathom at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or Fathom run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Fathom runs on Web, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what Fathom is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that Fathom cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. Fathom covers Auto-recording, AI summaries, Transcription, Highlight clips.
Related pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs PlanetScale
- Cockroach Labs vs Azure SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs ClickHouse
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs DuckDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DynamoDB
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Redshift
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Cassandra
- Cockroach Labs vs CouchDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Firebolt
- Cockroach Labs vs Pika
- Cockroach Labs vs Anthropic API
- Cockroach Labs vs D-ID
- Cockroach Labs vs Stable Diffusion
- Cockroach Labs vs AI21 Labs
- Cockroach Labs vs ChatGPT
- Cockroach Labs vs Copy.ai
- Cockroach Labs vs HeyGen
- Cockroach Labs vs Jasper
- Cockroach Labs vs Leonardo AI
- Cockroach Labs vs Murf
- Cockroach Labs vs Perplexity
- Cockroach Labs vs Pi
- Cockroach Labs vs Play.ht
- Cockroach Labs vs Replicate
- Cockroach Labs vs Replika
- Cockroach Labs vs Rytr
- Cockroach Labs vs Together AI
- Fathom vs PostgreSQL
- Fathom vs Airtable
- Fathom vs Amazon Aurora
- Fathom vs Elasticsearch
- Fathom vs PlanetScale
- Fathom vs Azure SQL
- Fathom vs ClickHouse
- Fathom vs Couchbase
- Fathom vs DuckDB
- Fathom vs DynamoDB
- Fathom vs MariaDB
- Fathom vs Oracle Database
- Fathom vs Amazon RDS
- Fathom vs Amazon Redshift
- Fathom vs Apache Druid
- Fathom vs Cassandra
- Fathom vs CouchDB
- Fathom vs Firebolt
- Fathom vs Pika
- Fathom vs Anthropic API
- Fathom vs D-ID
- Fathom vs Stable Diffusion
- Fathom vs AI21 Labs
- Fathom vs ChatGPT
- Fathom vs Copy.ai
- Fathom vs HeyGen
- Fathom vs Jasper
- Fathom vs Leonardo AI
- Fathom vs Murf
- Fathom vs Perplexity
- Fathom vs Pi
- Fathom vs Play.ht
- Fathom vs Replicate
- Fathom vs Replika
- Fathom vs Rytr
- Fathom vs Together AI

