Softwr

Software · head to head

ClientPoint vs Akita

ClientPoint logo

ClientPoint

Software

Business Proposal Software

From
$65/month
Rated
-
Akita logo

Akita

Software

Customer Success Without the Complexity

From
$160/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: ClientPoint pricing page shows no plan tiers or figures; every path leads to Talk with Someone Now or Schedule Demo, so price is available only by contacting sales; Akita starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial
  • They diverge on capability: ClientPoint covers Multimedia proposals, Akita covers Health scores.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which ClientPoint and Akita actually diverge.

Attributes where ClientPoint and Akita differ
AttributeClientPointAkita
Starting price$65/month$160/month
Founded20092018

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in ClientPoint

  • Multimedia proposals
  • Video embedding
  • E-signatures
  • Analytics
  • Team collaboration
  • Microsoft Dynamics
  • DocuSign

Only in Akita

  • Health scores
  • Customer segments
  • Lifecycle stages
  • Alerts
  • Custom metrics
  • Intercom
  • Stripe

Both cover

  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

ClientPoint

  • Sales teams building AI-assisted proposal and sales room content who are prepared to go through a sales call for pricingnot Akita

Akita

  • Centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success teamnot ClientPoint
  • Building health scores to flag at-risk accountsnot ClientPoint
  • Segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooksnot ClientPoint
  • Identifying expansion revenue opportunitiesnot ClientPoint
  • Task and workflow management for CSMsnot ClientPoint

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

ClientPoint

  • Pricing page shows no plan tiers or figures; every path leads to Talk with Someone Now or Schedule Demo, so price is available only by contacting sales

Akita

  • Starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial
  • Tier breakdown above the entry price is not published

Pricing, plan by plan

ClientPoint

$65/month
  • Professional$65/month
    • Multimedia proposals
    • Templates
    • Analytics
  • Enterprise$125/month
    • Custom branding
    • Advanced analytics
    • API

Akita

$160/month
  • Starter$160/month
    • Health scores
    • Basic integrations
    • Alerts
  • Professional$400/month
    • Unlimited integrations
    • Custom metrics
    • API

Which should you pick?

Choose ClientPoint if

  • You need multimedia proposals.
  • You also want video embedding.

Choose Akita if

  • You need health scores.
  • You also want customer segments.

Questions people ask

Is ClientPoint or Akita better?
Neither clearly leads. ClientPoint starts at $65/month and Akita at $160/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, ClientPoint or Akita?
ClientPoint starts at $65/month and Akita at $160/month.
Does ClientPoint or Akita run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is ClientPoint best used for?
ClientPoint is most often used for sales teams building ai-assisted proposal and sales room content who are prepared to go through a sales call for pricing. Of those, sales teams building ai-assisted proposal and sales room content who are prepared to go through a sales call for pricing is not what Akita is typically brought in for.
What can ClientPoint do that Akita cannot?
ClientPoint covers Multimedia proposals, Video embedding, E-signatures, Analytics. Akita covers Health scores, Customer segments, Lifecycle stages, Alerts. Both handle Salesforce, HubSpot, Web support.

Related pages