Softwr

Maps & Navigation · head to head

Bing Maps vs ORBCOMM

Bing Maps logo

Bing Maps

Maps & Navigation

Web mapping services with street maps, aerial imagery, and APIs for developers

From
On request
Rated
-
ORBCOMM logo

ORBCOMM

Maritime & Shipping

IoT solutions for maritime asset tracking

From
$25/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Bing Maps bing Maps API keys are split into Basic (free-use, capped) and Enterprise (billable) tiers, and Spatial Data Services requests exceeding 1,000,000 per year are billable even when a session ID is used, per Microsoft's own developer documentation.; ORBCOMM satellite latency of approximately 600 milliseconds limits real-time applications
  • They diverge on capability: Bing Maps covers Core Functionality, ORBCOMM covers Satellite tracking.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bing Maps and ORBCOMM actually diverge.

Attributes where Bing Maps and ORBCOMM differ
AttributeBing MapsORBCOMM
Starting priceOn request$25/month
Pricing modelfreemiumsubscription
PlatformsWebSatellite, Web
CategoryMaps & NavigationMaritime & Shipping
FoundedUnknown1995

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bing Maps

  • Core Functionality
  • User Interface

Only in ORBCOMM

  • Satellite tracking
  • Container monitoring
  • Cold chain monitoring
  • Fleet telematics
  • TMS systems
  • ERP platforms
  • Warehouse management
  • Web support

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bing Maps

  • Bing Maps API keys are split into Basic (free-use, capped) and Enterprise (billable) tiers, and Spatial Data Services requests exceeding 1,000,000 per year are billable even when a session ID is used, per Microsoft's own developer documentation.

ORBCOMM

  • Satellite latency of approximately 600 milliseconds limits real-time applications
  • Higher cost per message compared to terrestrial cellular IoT solutions
  • Coverage remains near-global rather than fully global in all remote regions

Pricing, plan by plan

Bing Maps

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Bing Maps review.

ORBCOMM

$25/month
  • Fleet Manager$99/month
    • Real-time tracking
    • Geofencing
    • Reporting

Which should you pick?

Choose Bing Maps if

  • You need core functionality.
  • You also want user interface.

Choose ORBCOMM if

  • You need satellite tracking.
  • You work on Satellite, Web.
  • You also want container monitoring.

Questions people ask

Is Bing Maps or ORBCOMM better?
Neither clearly leads. Bing Maps starts at On request and ORBCOMM at $25/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bing Maps or ORBCOMM?
Bing Maps starts at On request and ORBCOMM at $25/month.
Does Bing Maps or ORBCOMM run on more platforms?
Bing Maps runs on Web. ORBCOMM runs on Satellite, Web.
What can Bing Maps do that ORBCOMM cannot?
Bing Maps covers Core Functionality, User Interface. ORBCOMM covers Satellite tracking, Container monitoring, Cold chain monitoring, Fleet telematics.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

ORBCOMM: What is ORBCOMM's satellite coverage?

ORBCOMM's OGx service provides nearly global coverage across over 160 countries using a constellation of low Earth orbit satellites for two-way messaging and IoT data services.

Source
ORBCOMM: How does satellite IoT compare to cellular connectivity?

ORBCOMM satellite offers immunity from cellular blind spots, network outages, congestion, and weather-related disruptions. However, satellite connectivity introduces approximately 600 milliseconds of round-trip latency.

Source
ORBCOMM: What can ORBCOMM monitor in containers?

ORBCOMM's CT 1010 device provides sensor-based monitoring for container fire detection, unauthorized access alerts, damage detection, and asset visibility, with real-time satellite-based tracking.

Source

Related pages

Other head to heads