Backup & Disaster Recovery · head to head
Bacula Enterprise vs Cohesity DataProtect

Bacula Enterprise
Backup & Disaster Recovery
Open-source enterprise backup solution
- From
- $500/year
- Rated
- -

Cohesity DataProtect
Backup & Disaster Recovery
Hyperconverged secondary data protection
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bacula Enterprise pricing is not published; the vendor asks for a request rather than listing rates; Cohesity DataProtect primarily focused on enterprise customers; less suitable for small businesses
- They diverge on capability: Bacula Enterprise covers Modular architecture, Cohesity DataProtect covers Hyperconverged architecture.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bacula Enterprise and Cohesity DataProtect actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bacula Enterprise | Cohesity DataProtect |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $500/year | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web | On-premises, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud |
| Founded | 2009 | 2013 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup & Disaster Recovery).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bacula Enterprise
- Modular architecture
- Plugin framework
- Deduplication
- Cloud storage
- Encryption
- Automated recovery testing
- Kubernetes
- Docker
Only in Cohesity DataProtect
- Hyperconverged architecture
- Instant mass restore
- Global deduplication
- Global search
- Ransomware protection
- Cloud tiering
- Pure Storage
- Cisco
Both cover
- VMware
- Hyper-V
- AWS
- Azure
- Windows support
- Linux support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bacula Enterprise
- Enterprise backup across virtual machines, databases and containersnot Cohesity DataProtect
- Multi-cloud and hybrid backup from one systemnot Cohesity DataProtect
- Backup where licensing by data volume would be prohibitive, since Bacula does not charge by capacitynot Cohesity DataProtect
- Long-retention archival for regulated environmentsnot Cohesity DataProtect
Cohesity DataProtect
- Data protectionnot Bacula Enterprise
- Disaster recoverynot Bacula Enterprise
- Business continuitynot Bacula Enterprise
- Ransomware protectionnot Bacula Enterprise
- Compliancenot Bacula Enterprise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bacula Enterprise
- Pricing is not published; the vendor asks for a request rather than listing rates
- The differences between Enterprise and the open source Community edition are not set out on the product pages, so what the licence buys is unclear until you talk to sales
- Aimed at data centre and enterprise environments rather than small deployments
Cohesity DataProtect
- Primarily focused on enterprise customers; less suitable for small businesses
- Requires significant IT expertise to optimize deduplication and retention policies
- High upfront infrastructure costs for on-premises deployment
Pricing, plan by plan
Bacula Enterprise
$500/year- Bacula Enterprise$500/year
- Unlimited data
- Plugin support
- Enterprise support
Cohesity DataProtect
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Cohesity DataProtect review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Bacula Enterprise if
- You need modular architecture.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want plugin framework.
Choose Cohesity DataProtect if
- You need hyperconverged architecture.
- You work on On-premises, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud.
- You also want instant mass restore.
Questions people ask
- Is Bacula Enterprise or Cohesity DataProtect better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bacula Enterprise starts at $500/year and Cohesity DataProtect at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bacula Enterprise or Cohesity DataProtect?
- Bacula Enterprise starts at $500/year and Cohesity DataProtect at On request.
- Does Bacula Enterprise or Cohesity DataProtect run on more platforms?
- Bacula Enterprise runs on Windows, Linux, Web. Cohesity DataProtect runs on On-premises, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud.
- What is Bacula Enterprise best used for?
- Bacula Enterprise is most often used for enterprise backup across virtual machines, databases and containers, multi-cloud and hybrid backup from one system, backup where licensing by data volume would be prohibitive, since bacula does not charge by capacity, long-retention archival for regulated environments. Of those, enterprise backup across virtual machines, databases and containers and multi-cloud and hybrid backup from one system are not what Cohesity DataProtect is typically brought in for.
- What can Bacula Enterprise do that Cohesity DataProtect cannot?
- Bacula Enterprise covers Modular architecture, Plugin framework, Deduplication, Cloud storage. Cohesity DataProtect covers Hyperconverged architecture, Instant mass restore, Global deduplication, Global search. Both handle VMware, Hyper-V, AWS, Azure.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cohesity DataProtect: What is the main benefit of Cohesity DataProtect's instant recovery?
Cohesity uniquely reduces downtime by enabling instant mass restoration of any number of VMs, large volumes of unstructured data, and Oracle databases to any point in time.
SourceCohesity DataProtect: How much can Cohesity reduce data protection costs?
Cohesity DataProtect reduces data protection costs by 70% or more through unified management and deduplication.
SourceCohesity DataProtect: What platforms and workloads does Cohesity DataProtect support?
Cohesity DataProtect protects on-premises systems, multiple cloud environments, and SaaS applications through a single unified platform.
SourceCohesity DataProtect: Does Cohesity use security best practices for backup protection?
Yes. Cohesity DataProtect uses multilayered security architecture designed to minimize the risk of backups becoming a ransomware target.
SourceRelated pages
More on Bacula Enterprise
More on Cohesity DataProtect
Other head to heads
- Bacula Enterprise vs Backupify
- Bacula Enterprise vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Bacula Enterprise vs CloudAlly
- Bacula Enterprise vs Spanning Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Bacula Enterprise vs Datto SIRIS
- Bacula Enterprise vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Bacula Enterprise vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Bacula Enterprise vs Comet Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs Duplicacy
- Bacula Enterprise vs Keepit
- Bacula Enterprise vs Rewind
- Bacula Enterprise vs Altaro VM Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs Borg Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs HPE StoreOnce
- Bacula Enterprise vs MSP360 Backup
- Bacula Enterprise vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Bacula Enterprise vs OwnBackup
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Backupify
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Cohesity DataProtect vs CloudAlly
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Spanning Backup
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Datto SIRIS
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Comet Backup
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Duplicacy
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Keepit
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Rewind
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Altaro VM Backup
- Cohesity DataProtect vs Borg Backup
- Cohesity DataProtect vs HPE StoreOnce
- Cohesity DataProtect vs MSP360 Backup
- Cohesity DataProtect vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Cohesity DataProtect vs OwnBackup
