Softwr

Software · head to head

AWS (Amazon Web Services) vs CouchDB

AWS (Amazon Web Services) logo

AWS (Amazon Web Services)

Software

The leading cloud computing platform

From
Free
Rated
-
CouchDB logo

CouchDB

Software

Seamless multi-master sync with Apache CouchDB

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: AWS (Amazon Web Services) data transfer in is free and data transfer out is charged, which is the standard source of unexpected bills; CouchDB append-only storage model may have performance implications for certain workloads with high update rates
  • They diverge on capability: AWS (Amazon Web Services) covers EC2 - Virtual Servers, CouchDB covers Multi-master Replication.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which AWS (Amazon Web Services) and CouchDB actually diverge.

Attributes where AWS (Amazon Web Services) and CouchDB differ
AttributeAWS (Amazon Web Services)CouchDB
Pricing modelusage-basedopen-source
PlatformsWeb, Api, Cli, MobileDocker, Windows (x64), macOS, Linux (Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, CentOS), Raspberry Pi
Founded20061999

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in AWS (Amazon Web Services)

  • EC2 - Virtual Servers
  • S3 - Object Storage
  • RDS - Managed Database
  • Lambda - Serverless Computing
  • CloudFront - CDN
  • VPC - Virtual Network
  • IAM - Access Management
  • CloudWatch - Monitoring

Only in CouchDB

  • Multi-master Replication
  • HTTP/JSON API
  • MapReduce Views
  • ACID Semantics
  • Offline-first
  • Conflict Resolution
  • Fauxton UI
  • PouchDB

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

AWS (Amazon Web Services)

  • Web hostingnot CouchDB
  • Data storagenot CouchDB
  • Machine learningnot CouchDB
  • Big data analyticsnot CouchDB
  • Application developmentnot CouchDB

CouchDB

  • Offline-first applications requiring seamless replication across mobile and server environmentsnot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
  • Multi-master deployments where data consistency eventually resolves across regionsnot AWS (Amazon Web Services)
  • IoT and edge computing scenarios with intermittent connectivitynot AWS (Amazon Web Services)

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

AWS (Amazon Web Services)

  • Data transfer in is free and data transfer out is charged, which is the standard source of unexpected bills
  • Discounts require one or three year Savings Plan commitments rather than being automatic
  • Every service is priced separately, so a working architecture has no single published cost
  • The free tier is a promotional allowance rather than an ongoing free plan

CouchDB

  • Append-only storage model may have performance implications for certain workloads with high update rates
  • Requires network synchronisation for cluster data consistency; can introduce latency in multi-master scenarios
  • No explicit support for complex joins; MapReduce queries may be inefficient compared to relational databases

Pricing, plan by plan

AWS (Amazon Web Services)

Free
  • AWS Free TierFree
    • EC2 750 hours/month
    • 5GB S3 storage
    • 20GB data transfer
  • Pay-As-You-GoFree
    • No upfront payment
    • No long-term commitments
    • Pay only for what you use

CouchDB

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the CouchDB review.

Which should you pick?

Choose AWS (Amazon Web Services) if

  • You need ec2 - virtual servers.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api, Cli, Mobile.
  • You also want s3 - object storage.

Choose CouchDB if

  • You need multi-master replication.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Docker, Windows (x64), macOS, Linux (Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, CentOS), Raspberry Pi.
  • You also want http/json api.

Questions people ask

Is AWS (Amazon Web Services) or CouchDB better?
Neither clearly leads. AWS (Amazon Web Services) starts at Free and CouchDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, AWS (Amazon Web Services) or CouchDB?
AWS (Amazon Web Services) starts at Free and CouchDB at Free.
Does AWS (Amazon Web Services) or CouchDB run on more platforms?
AWS (Amazon Web Services) runs on Web, Api, Cli, Mobile. CouchDB runs on Docker, Windows (x64), macOS, Linux (Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, CentOS), Raspberry Pi.
Can I use AWS (Amazon Web Services) for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is AWS (Amazon Web Services) best used for?
AWS (Amazon Web Services) is most often used for web hosting, data storage, machine learning, big data analytics. Of those, web hosting and data storage are not what CouchDB is typically brought in for.
What can AWS (Amazon Web Services) do that CouchDB cannot?
AWS (Amazon Web Services) covers EC2 - Virtual Servers, S3 - Object Storage, RDS - Managed Database, Lambda - Serverless Computing. CouchDB covers Multi-master Replication, HTTP/JSON API, MapReduce Views, ACID Semantics.

Related pages

Other head to heads