Software · head to head
AVEVA PI System vs Sea Machines

AVEVA PI System
Software
Industrial data infrastructure for real-time insights
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AVEVA PI System pricing is not published and comes through an account representative; Sea Machines requires hardware fitted to the vessel; the autonomy systems are retrofits or new build installations rather than a software purchase
- They diverge on capability: AVEVA PI System covers Real-time data collection, Sea Machines covers Autonomous control.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AVEVA PI System and Sea Machines actually diverge.
| Attribute | AVEVA PI System | Sea Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $50000/one-time |
| Platforms | Desktop, Web, Mobile, Api | Embedded, Web, Mobile |
| Founded | 1967 | 2015 |
Identical on both: pricing model (one-time), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AVEVA PI System
- Real-time data collection
- Time-series data storage
- Asset framework
- Visualization
- Analytics
- Event management
- Notifications
- Data integration
Only in Sea Machines
- Autonomous control
- Remote operation
- Collision avoidance
- Pattern following
- Vessel systems
- Communication networks
- Shore-based control
- Embedded support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AVEVA PI System
- Collecting and historising real-time process data from plant equipmentnot Sea Machines
- Operations dashboards and alerting through PI Visionnot Sea Machines
- Edge data collection where connectivity is intermittentnot Sea Machines
- Pulling process data into Excel analysis with PI DataLinknot Sea Machines
- Utilities, pharma, mining and oil and gas process monitoringnot Sea Machines
Sea Machines
- Intelligent voyage and transit autonomy for workboatsnot AVEVA PI System
- Pattern autonomy for survey and repetitive route worknot AVEVA PI System
- Collision avoidance using the AI-ris computer vision sensornot AVEVA PI System
- Remote command and control of vessels, including in GPS denied environmentsnot AVEVA PI System
- Fleet management and telemetry through Fleetviewer and the SMLINK APIsnot AVEVA PI System
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AVEVA PI System
- Pricing is not published and comes through an account representative
- The vendor is moving to a subscription commercial model, so perpetual licence expectations no longer hold
- Made up of several separately named components, including PI Server, PI Vision, Edge Data Store and the adapters and connectors needed per data source
Sea Machines
- Requires hardware fitted to the vessel; the autonomy systems are retrofits or new build installations rather than a software purchase
- Targeted at vessels from 10 to 300 ft, so it does not address the largest commercial tonnage
- Pricing is not published and is arranged directly with the vendor
- The SM300-NG is the class-approved unit, so the cheaper SM300-SP does not carry the same approval
Pricing, plan by plan
AVEVA PI System
On request- Data Archive$undefined/license
- Time-series data storage
- High-speed data collection
- Data compression
- Operations$undefined/license
- PI Vision dashboards
- AF analytics
- Event frames
- Enterprise$undefined/license
- PI Integrator
- Cloud connectivity
- Advanced analytics
Sea Machines
$50000/one-time- SM300$75000/one-time
- Autonomous control
- Collision avoidance
- Remote operation
Which should you pick?
Choose AVEVA PI System if
- You need real-time data collection.
- You work on Desktop, Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want time-series data storage.
Choose Sea Machines if
- You need autonomous control.
- You work on Embedded, Web, Mobile.
- You also want remote operation.
Questions people ask
- Is AVEVA PI System or Sea Machines better?
- Neither clearly leads. AVEVA PI System starts at On request and Sea Machines at $50000/one-time, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AVEVA PI System or Sea Machines?
- AVEVA PI System starts at On request and Sea Machines at $50000/one-time.
- Does AVEVA PI System or Sea Machines run on more platforms?
- AVEVA PI System runs on Desktop, Web, Mobile, Api. Sea Machines runs on Embedded, Web, Mobile.
- What is AVEVA PI System best used for?
- AVEVA PI System is most often used for collecting and historising real-time process data from plant equipment, operations dashboards and alerting through pi vision, edge data collection where connectivity is intermittent, pulling process data into excel analysis with pi datalink. Of those, collecting and historising real-time process data from plant equipment and operations dashboards and alerting through pi vision are not what Sea Machines is typically brought in for.
- What can AVEVA PI System do that Sea Machines cannot?
- AVEVA PI System covers Real-time data collection, Time-series data storage, Asset framework, Visualization. Sea Machines covers Autonomous control, Remote operation, Collision avoidance, Pattern following.
Related pages
More on AVEVA PI System
More on Sea Machines
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- AVEVA PI System vs Enphase Enlighten
- AVEVA PI System vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- AVEVA PI System vs Aurora Solar
- AVEVA PI System vs ABB Ability
- AVEVA PI System vs AutoGrid Flex
- AVEVA PI System vs Bidgely UtilityAI
- AVEVA PI System vs Enel X DER Optimization
- AVEVA PI System vs GE Digital Grid Software
- AVEVA PI System vs Generac Grid Services
- AVEVA PI System vs Helioscope
- AVEVA PI System vs HOMER Energy
- AVEVA PI System vs Honeywell Building Management
- AVEVA PI System vs Influx Energy Management
- AVEVA PI System vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- AVEVA PI System vs OpenLink Endur
- AVEVA PI System vs SolarWinds
- AVEVA PI System vs Azelio Energy Storage
- AVEVA PI System vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- AVEVA PI System vs MarineTraffic
- AVEVA PI System vs ChartCo
- AVEVA PI System vs Kongsberg Maritime
- AVEVA PI System vs Veson Nautical
- AVEVA PI System vs Wartsila Voyage
- AVEVA PI System vs Windward
- AVEVA PI System vs Dataloy
- AVEVA PI System vs DNV Maritime
- AVEVA PI System vs exactEarth
- AVEVA PI System vs FourKites
- AVEVA PI System vs Freightos
- AVEVA PI System vs INTTRA
- AVEVA PI System vs Kpler
- AVEVA PI System vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- AVEVA PI System vs NAPA
- AVEVA PI System vs Nautilus Labs
- AVEVA PI System vs Navis N4
- AVEVA PI System vs NAVTOR
- Sea Machines vs Enphase Enlighten
- Sea Machines vs Fronius SOLARWEB
- Sea Machines vs Aurora Solar
- Sea Machines vs ABB Ability
- Sea Machines vs AutoGrid Flex
- Sea Machines vs Bidgely UtilityAI
- Sea Machines vs Enel X DER Optimization
- Sea Machines vs GE Digital Grid Software
- Sea Machines vs Generac Grid Services
- Sea Machines vs Helioscope
- Sea Machines vs HOMER Energy
- Sea Machines vs Honeywell Building Management
- Sea Machines vs Influx Energy Management
- Sea Machines vs Johnson Controls Metasys
- Sea Machines vs OpenLink Endur
- Sea Machines vs SolarWinds
- Sea Machines vs Azelio Energy Storage
- Sea Machines vs Clean Power Research PowerClerk
- Sea Machines vs MarineTraffic
- Sea Machines vs ChartCo
- Sea Machines vs Kongsberg Maritime
- Sea Machines vs Veson Nautical
- Sea Machines vs Wartsila Voyage
- Sea Machines vs Windward
- Sea Machines vs Dataloy
- Sea Machines vs DNV Maritime
- Sea Machines vs exactEarth
- Sea Machines vs FourKites
- Sea Machines vs Freightos
- Sea Machines vs INTTRA
- Sea Machines vs Kpler
- Sea Machines vs Lloyd's List Intelligence
- Sea Machines vs NAPA
- Sea Machines vs Nautilus Labs
- Sea Machines vs Navis N4
- Sea Machines vs NAVTOR

