Software · head to head
Alchemy vs Budibase
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Alchemy the free tier is capped at 30M compute units a month and 25 requests per second; Budibase cloud plans are metered on automation actions, from 5,000 a month on Pro to 250,000 on Business
- They diverge on capability: Alchemy covers Node APIs, Budibase covers Drag-and-drop builder.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Alchemy and Budibase actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Alchemy
- Node APIs
- Enhanced APIs
- NFT API
- Mempool
- 35+ chains
- SDKs
- Api support
Only in Budibase
- Drag-and-drop builder
- Database design
- REST API
- User management
- Custom code
- Workflows
- Responsive design
- 100+ integrations
Both cover
- Webhooks
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Alchemy
- Hosted blockchain node access across mainnets and testnetsnot Budibase
- Backing a production web3 application without running nodesnot Budibase
- Webhook-driven notifications for on-chain eventsnot Budibase
- Scaling read throughput beyond self-hosted node limitsnot Budibase
Budibase
- Building internal tools over existing databasesnot Alchemy
- Self-hosting an open source low-code platformnot Alchemy
- Admin panels and CRUD apps for operations teamsnot Alchemy
- Automations triggered by data changesnot Alchemy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Alchemy
- The free tier is capped at 30M compute units a month and 25 requests per second
- Free accounts are limited to 5 apps and 5 webhooks
- Beyond the free allowance it is $0.45 per 1M compute units for the first 300M a month
- Request cost varies by call complexity, from around 10 compute units to over 100, so spend is hard to predict from request counts alone
- Signed SLAs and priority support require an Enterprise contract
Budibase
- Cloud plans are metered on automation actions, from 5,000 a month on Pro to 250,000 on Business
- Creator seats are limited and cost $50 each beyond the included count
- End users are $5 per user per month on top of the plan
- Custom branding needs Premium, SSO enforcement and environment variables need Business, and audit logs are Enterprise only
- Log retention is tiered from 1 day on Pro to 365 days on Enterprise
- Monthly billing costs 20 percent more than annual
Pricing, plan by plan
Alchemy
Free- FreeFree
- 300M compute units
- 5 apps
- Core APIs
- Growth$49/month
- 400M compute units
- 15 apps
- Enhanced APIs
- Scale$199/month
- 1B compute units
- Unlimited apps
- Premium support
Budibase
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted
- Community support
- FreeFree
- Cloud hosted
- Limited features
- Premium$50/month
- Advanced features
- Email support
Which should you pick?
Choose Alchemy if
- You need node apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Api, Web.
- You also want enhanced apis.
Choose Budibase if
- You need drag-and-drop builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want database design.
Questions people ask
- Is Alchemy or Budibase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Alchemy starts at Free and Budibase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Alchemy or Budibase?
- Alchemy starts at Free and Budibase at Free.
- Does Alchemy or Budibase run on more platforms?
- Alchemy runs on Api, Web. Budibase runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Alchemy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Alchemy best used for?
- Alchemy is most often used for hosted blockchain node access across mainnets and testnets, backing a production web3 application without running nodes, webhook-driven notifications for on-chain events, scaling read throughput beyond self-hosted node limits. Of those, hosted blockchain node access across mainnets and testnets and backing a production web3 application without running nodes are not what Budibase is typically brought in for.
- What can Alchemy do that Budibase cannot?
- Alchemy covers Node APIs, Enhanced APIs, NFT API, Mempool. Budibase covers Drag-and-drop builder, Database design, REST API, User management. Both handle Webhooks, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Alchemy vs Binance
- Alchemy vs Bybit
- Alchemy vs Curve Finance
- Alchemy vs Gemini
- Alchemy vs Uniswap
- Alchemy vs dYdX
- Alchemy vs Gate.io
- Alchemy vs PancakeSwap
- Alchemy vs Aave
- Alchemy vs CoinGecko
- Alchemy vs Compound
- Alchemy vs KuCoin
- Alchemy vs Lido
- Alchemy vs MakerDAO
- Alchemy vs OKX
- Alchemy vs SushiSwap
- Alchemy vs Argent
- Alchemy vs Bitfinex
- Alchemy vs Tableau
- Alchemy vs Looker
- Alchemy vs Metabase
- Alchemy vs Redash
- Alchemy vs Fibery
- Alchemy vs Apache Superset
- Alchemy vs Baserow
- Alchemy vs NocoDB
- Budibase vs Binance
- Budibase vs Bybit
- Budibase vs Curve Finance
- Budibase vs Gemini
- Budibase vs Uniswap
- Budibase vs dYdX
- Budibase vs Gate.io
- Budibase vs PancakeSwap
- Budibase vs Aave
- Budibase vs CoinGecko
- Budibase vs Compound
- Budibase vs KuCoin
- Budibase vs Lido
- Budibase vs MakerDAO
- Budibase vs OKX
- Budibase vs SushiSwap
- Budibase vs Argent
- Budibase vs Bitfinex
- Budibase vs Tableau
- Budibase vs Looker
- Budibase vs Metabase
- Budibase vs Redash
- Budibase vs Fibery
- Budibase vs Apache Superset
- Budibase vs Baserow
- Budibase vs NocoDB


