Software · head to head
Alchemy vs Fibery
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Alchemy the free tier is capped at 30M compute units a month and 25 requests per second; Fibery free plan limited to 10 users and 10 guests
- They diverge on capability: Alchemy covers Node APIs, Fibery covers Customizable databases.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Alchemy and Fibery actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Alchemy
- Node APIs
- Enhanced APIs
- NFT API
- Webhooks
- Mempool
- 35+ chains
- SDKs
Only in Fibery
- Customizable databases
- Bi-directional linking
- Whiteboards
- Documents
- Timelines
- Formulas
- Automations
- API access
Both cover
- Api support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Alchemy
- Hosted blockchain node access across mainnets and testnetsnot Fibery
- Backing a production web3 application without running nodesnot Fibery
- Webhook-driven notifications for on-chain eventsnot Fibery
- Scaling read throughput beyond self-hosted node limitsnot Fibery
Fibery
- Work management and product development platformnot Alchemy
- Relational database with multiple view types (table, board, gallery, timeline, calendar, Gantt)not Alchemy
- Knowledge base and document collaborationnot Alchemy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Alchemy
- The free tier is capped at 30M compute units a month and 25 requests per second
- Free accounts are limited to 5 apps and 5 webhooks
- Beyond the free allowance it is $0.45 per 1M compute units for the first 300M a month
- Request cost varies by call complexity, from around 10 compute units to over 100, so spend is hard to predict from request counts alone
- Signed SLAs and priority support require an Enterprise contract
Fibery
- Free plan limited to 10 users and 10 guests
- Free plan limited to 10 databases
- Enterprise plan requires minimum of 25 paid users
- SAML SSO available only on Enterprise plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Alchemy
Free- FreeFree
- 300M compute units
- 5 apps
- Core APIs
- Growth$49/month
- 400M compute units
- 15 apps
- Enhanced APIs
- Scale$199/month
- 1B compute units
- Unlimited apps
- Premium support
Fibery
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fibery review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Alchemy if
- You need node apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Api, Web.
- You also want enhanced apis.
Choose Fibery if
- You need customizable databases.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want bi-directional linking.
Questions people ask
- Is Alchemy or Fibery better?
- Neither clearly leads. Alchemy starts at Free and Fibery at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Alchemy or Fibery?
- Alchemy starts at Free and Fibery at Free.
- Does Alchemy or Fibery run on more platforms?
- Alchemy runs on Api, Web. Fibery runs on Web.
- Can I use Alchemy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Alchemy best used for?
- Alchemy is most often used for hosted blockchain node access across mainnets and testnets, backing a production web3 application without running nodes, webhook-driven notifications for on-chain events, scaling read throughput beyond self-hosted node limits. Of those, hosted blockchain node access across mainnets and testnets and backing a production web3 application without running nodes are not what Fibery is typically brought in for.
- What can Alchemy do that Fibery cannot?
- Alchemy covers Node APIs, Enhanced APIs, NFT API, Webhooks. Fibery covers Customizable databases, Bi-directional linking, Whiteboards, Documents. Both handle Api support, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Alchemy vs Binance
- Alchemy vs Bybit
- Alchemy vs Curve Finance
- Alchemy vs Gemini
- Alchemy vs Uniswap
- Alchemy vs dYdX
- Alchemy vs Gate.io
- Alchemy vs PancakeSwap
- Alchemy vs Aave
- Alchemy vs CoinGecko
- Alchemy vs Compound
- Alchemy vs KuCoin
- Alchemy vs Lido
- Alchemy vs MakerDAO
- Alchemy vs OKX
- Alchemy vs SushiSwap
- Alchemy vs Argent
- Alchemy vs Bitfinex
- Alchemy vs Tableau
- Alchemy vs Looker
- Alchemy vs Metabase
- Alchemy vs Redash
- Alchemy vs Apache Superset
- Alchemy vs Baserow
- Alchemy vs Budibase
- Alchemy vs NocoDB
- Fibery vs Binance
- Fibery vs Bybit
- Fibery vs Curve Finance
- Fibery vs Gemini
- Fibery vs Uniswap
- Fibery vs dYdX
- Fibery vs Gate.io
- Fibery vs PancakeSwap
- Fibery vs Aave
- Fibery vs CoinGecko
- Fibery vs Compound
- Fibery vs KuCoin
- Fibery vs Lido
- Fibery vs MakerDAO
- Fibery vs OKX
- Fibery vs SushiSwap
- Fibery vs Argent
- Fibery vs Bitfinex
- Fibery vs Tableau
- Fibery vs Looker
- Fibery vs Metabase
- Fibery vs Redash
- Fibery vs Apache Superset
- Fibery vs Baserow
- Fibery vs Budibase
- Fibery vs NocoDB


