Software · head to head
Amazon Redshift ML vs Databricks

Databricks
Software
Unified analytics platform for data engineering and data science
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift ML free tier covers only two CREATE MODEL requests per month for two months, capped at 100,000 cells per request; beyond that training is metered at $20 per million cells for the first 10 million, dropping in tiers to $7 per million cells over 100 million; Databricks cloud compute is billed separately by the cloud provider on top of Databricks DBU charges
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift ML covers SQL-based ML, Databricks covers Delta Lake.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift ML and Databricks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift ML | Databricks |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp |
| Founded | 2006 | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift ML
- SQL-based ML
- AutoML
- SageMaker integration
- BYOM support
- In-database predictions
- Amazon Redshift
- SageMaker
- S3
Only in Databricks
- Delta Lake
- Apache Spark
- MLflow
- Unity Catalog
- Photon Engine
- Collaborative Notebooks
- Auto-scaling
- AWS
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift ML
- Training and running machine learning models directly from SQL inside Amazon Redshiftnot Databricks
Databricks
- Running Spark data engineering pipelines on managed clustersnot Amazon Redshift ML
- Building a lakehouse over data in cloud object storagenot Amazon Redshift ML
- Training and serving machine learning models alongside the datanot Amazon Redshift ML
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift ML
- Free tier covers only two CREATE MODEL requests per month for two months, capped at 100,000 cells per request; beyond that training is metered at $20 per million cells for the first 10 million, dropping in tiers to $7 per million cells over 100 million
Databricks
- Cloud compute is billed separately by the cloud provider on top of Databricks DBU charges
- The free trial lasts 14 days
- Discounts require a Committed Use Contract, with larger commitments needed for larger discounts
- Azure Databricks pricing is set by Microsoft rather than by Databricks
- Security and compliance capabilities are sold as separate platform add ons rather than included in the base rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift ML
Free- Free TrialFree
- 2-month trial
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Per-node pricing
- SageMaker training
Databricks
Free- Community EditionFree
- Limited cluster
- Notebook environment
- Community support
- Standard$0.07/DBU
- Jobs compute
- SQL compute
- Standard support
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift ML if
- You need sql-based ml.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automl.
Choose Databricks if
- You need delta lake.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp.
- You also want apache spark.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift ML or Databricks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift ML starts at Free and Databricks at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift ML or Databricks?
- Amazon Redshift ML starts at Free and Databricks at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift ML or Databricks run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift ML runs on Web. Databricks runs on Web, Aws, Azure, Gcp.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift ML for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift ML best used for?
- Amazon Redshift ML is most often used for training and running machine learning models directly from sql inside amazon redshift. Of those, training and running machine learning models directly from sql inside amazon redshift is not what Databricks is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift ML do that Databricks cannot?
- Amazon Redshift ML covers SQL-based ML, AutoML, SageMaker integration, BYOM support. Databricks covers Delta Lake, Apache Spark, MLflow, Unity Catalog. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
More on Amazon Redshift ML
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift ML vs AWS SageMaker
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Google Vertex AI
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Azure Machine Learning
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DataRobot
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Snowflake
- Amazon Redshift ML vs TensorFlow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Comet ML
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Keras
- Amazon Redshift ML vs MLflow
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Jupyter
- Amazon Redshift ML vs PyTorch
- Amazon Redshift ML vs scikit-learn
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Weights & Biases
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Alteryx
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Anaconda
- Amazon Redshift ML vs Dataiku
- Amazon Redshift ML vs DVC
- Databricks vs AWS SageMaker
- Databricks vs Google Vertex AI
- Databricks vs Azure Machine Learning
- Databricks vs DataRobot
- Databricks vs Snowflake
- Databricks vs TensorFlow
- Databricks vs Comet ML
- Databricks vs Keras
- Databricks vs MLflow
- Databricks vs Jupyter
- Databricks vs PyTorch
- Databricks vs scikit-learn
- Databricks vs Apache Spark MLlib
- Databricks vs Weights & Biases
- Databricks vs Alteryx
- Databricks vs Anaconda
- Databricks vs Dataiku
- Databricks vs DVC

