Software · head to head
Pix4Dfields vs CropX
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Pix4Dfields satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year; CropX the platform depends on CropX in-field hardware, including soil sensors, evapotranspiration sensors, weather stations and telemetry devices
- They diverge on capability: Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation, CropX covers Soil moisture sensing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Pix4Dfields and CropX actually diverge.
| Attribute | Pix4Dfields | CropX |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $330/month | $29/month |
| Platforms | Windows, Ios | Web, Ios, Android, Hardware |
| Founded | 2011 | 2015 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Pix4Dfields
- Orthomosaic generation
- NDVI & vegetation indices
- Multispectral processing
- Zonation mapping
- Prescription maps
- Stand count
- Export to machinery
- Offline processing
Only in CropX
- Soil moisture sensing
- Irrigation scheduling
- Salinity monitoring
- Root zone analysis
- Weather integration
- Valley Irrigation
- Lindsay
- Netafim
Both cover
- SSL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Pix4Dfields
- Processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limitsnot CropX
- Generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveysnot CropX
- Producing variable rate prescription maps for exporting to farm machinerynot CropX
- Agronomists producing crop scouting reports from drone flightsnot CropX
CropX
- Scheduling irrigation from continuous soil moisture sensor readingsnot Pix4Dfields
- Monitoring disease risk and crop nutrition against in-field weather datanot Pix4Dfields
- Combining sensor, weather and satellite data in a single farm management systemnot Pix4Dfields
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Pix4Dfields
- Satellite imagery is sold as separate credit packages on top of the subscription, with only 100 free credits included per year
- Monthly billing is listed at $165.83 per month against $1,990 for a year, so paying monthly costs substantially more
- The software runs only on Windows and macOS, with no Linux build
CropX
- The platform depends on CropX in-field hardware, including soil sensors, evapotranspiration sensors, weather stations and telemetry devices
- Pricing is by quote only, with no rate, minimum or named cost driver published; the site offers only a demo request handled by a local sales team
Pricing, plan by plan
Pix4Dfields
$330/month- Monthly$330/month
- RGB & multispectral processing
- Vegetation indices
- Zonation maps
- Annual$2640/year
- Everything in Monthly
- 33% savings
- Priority support
- Perpetual$5500/one-time
- Lifetime license
- 1 year updates
- Local processing
CropX
$29/month- Basic$250/sensor/year
- Soil moisture
- Temperature
- Basic analytics
- Advanced$500/sensor/year
- Full analytics
- Irrigation recommendations
- API access
Which should you pick?
Choose Pix4Dfields if
- You need orthomosaic generation.
- You work on Windows, Ios.
- You also want ndvi & vegetation indices.
Choose CropX if
- You need soil moisture sensing.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware.
- You also want irrigation scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Pix4Dfields or CropX better?
- Neither clearly leads. Pix4Dfields starts at $330/month and CropX at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Pix4Dfields or CropX?
- Pix4Dfields starts at $330/month and CropX at $29/month.
- Does Pix4Dfields or CropX run on more platforms?
- Pix4Dfields runs on Windows, Ios. CropX runs on Web, Ios, Android, Hardware.
- What is Pix4Dfields best used for?
- Pix4Dfields is most often used for processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limits, generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveys, producing variable rate prescription maps for exporting to farm machinery, agronomists producing crop scouting reports from drone flights. Of those, processing drone imagery of fields into orthomosaics without acreage limits and generating vegetation indices and crop health maps from aerial surveys are not what CropX is typically brought in for.
- What can Pix4Dfields do that CropX cannot?
- Pix4Dfields covers Orthomosaic generation, NDVI & vegetation indices, Multispectral processing, Zonation mapping. CropX covers Soil moisture sensing, Irrigation scheduling, Salinity monitoring, Root zone analysis. Both handle SSL.
Related pages
More on Pix4Dfields
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Pix4Dfields vs Granular
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriSync
- Pix4Dfields vs Bushel
- Pix4Dfields vs Conservis
- Pix4Dfields vs FarmLogs
- Pix4Dfields vs MyJohnDeere
- Pix4Dfields vs 365FarmNet
- Pix4Dfields vs Ag-Analytics
- Pix4Dfields vs Ag Leader
- Pix4Dfields vs AgCode
- Pix4Dfields vs Agrivi
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriWater
- Pix4Dfields vs AgriWebb
- Pix4Dfields vs Agronomic
- Pix4Dfields vs Agworld
- Pix4Dfields vs Arable
- Pix4Dfields vs Bushel Farm
- Pix4Dfields vs CattleMax
- CropX vs Granular
- CropX vs AgriSync
- CropX vs Bushel
- CropX vs Conservis
- CropX vs FarmLogs
- CropX vs MyJohnDeere
- CropX vs 365FarmNet
- CropX vs Ag-Analytics
- CropX vs Ag Leader
- CropX vs AgCode
- CropX vs Agrivi
- CropX vs AgriWater
- CropX vs AgriWebb
- CropX vs Agronomic
- CropX vs Agworld
- CropX vs Arable
- CropX vs Bushel Farm
- CropX vs CattleMax


