Software Development · head to head
LangSmith vs Devin
LangSmith
Software Development
Know what your agents are really doing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Devin
Software Development
Autonomous AI software engineer planning and executing code in its own environment
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: LangSmith usage beyond the included trace allotment is billed in LangChain Compute Units at $1.50 per LCU and Storage Units at $1.00 per LSU, an unfamiliar metering unit compared to flat per-seat pricing, as of August 2026.; Devin pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LangSmith and Devin actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Software Development).
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LangSmith
No use cases recorded yet. See the LangSmith review.
Devin
- Feature implementation and ticket resolution in established codebasesnot LangSmith
- Code migrations and refactoring at scale across repositoriesnot LangSmith
- Bug fixing and debugging with test-driven verificationnot LangSmith
- Rapid prototyping and proof-of-concept developmentnot LangSmith
- Repetitive implementation tasks freeing human engineers for complex designnot LangSmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LangSmith
- Usage beyond the included trace allotment is billed in LangChain Compute Units at $1.50 per LCU and Storage Units at $1.00 per LSU, an unfamiliar metering unit compared to flat per-seat pricing, as of August 2026.
Devin
- Pricing not published; specific costs and plan tiers require signup or contact with sales
- Cannot handle extremely difficult tasks reliably; success rate decreases with task complexity
- Requires clear, well-scoped task descriptions; ambiguous requirements reduce effectiveness
- Requires human oversight and integration into existing workflows; not fully autonomous
Pricing, plan by plan
LangSmith
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the LangSmith review.
Devin
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Devin review.
Which should you pick?
Choose LangSmith if
Nothing in the data separates LangSmith from Devin on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is LangSmith or Devin better?
- Neither clearly leads. LangSmith starts at On request and Devin at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LangSmith or Devin?
- LangSmith starts at On request and Devin at On request.
- Does LangSmith or Devin run on more platforms?
- LangSmith runs on Web. Devin runs on Desktop, Windsurf integration, Web.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- LangSmith vs Windsurf
- LangSmith vs Zed
- LangSmith vs Cursor
- LangSmith vs Amp
- LangSmith vs Augment Code
- LangSmith vs Baseten
- LangSmith vs Braintrust
- LangSmith vs Bun
- LangSmith vs Cline
- LangSmith vs Factory
- LangSmith vs Humanloop
- LangSmith vs Langfuse
- LangSmith vs Qodo
- LangSmith vs Val Town
- Devin vs Windsurf
- Devin vs Zed
- Devin vs Cursor
- Devin vs Amp
- Devin vs Augment Code
- Devin vs Baseten
- Devin vs Braintrust
- Devin vs Bun
- Devin vs Cline
- Devin vs Factory
- Devin vs Humanloop
- Devin vs Langfuse
- Devin vs Qodo
- Devin vs Val Town
