Imago vs Fusion Mining

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Pricing, plan by plan

Which should you pick?

Questions people ask

Is Imago or Fusion Mining better?

Neither clearly leads. Imago starts at On request and Fusion Mining at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Imago or Fusion Mining?

Imago starts at On request and Fusion Mining at On request.

Does Imago or Fusion Mining run on more platforms?

Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.

What is Imago best used for?

Imago is most often used for digitising and managing drill core photography, linking core imagery to geological logging data, streaming high-resolution core imagery into leapfrog models, sharing geoscientific imagery across a distributed exploration team. Of those, digitising and managing drill core photography and linking core imagery to geological logging data are not what Fusion Mining is typically brought in for.

What can Imago do that Fusion Mining cannot?

Imago covers Geological database, Drill hole management, Sample tracking, Data validation. Fusion Mining covers Geological modeling, Mine design, Resource estimation, Database management. Both handle Leapfrog, Vulcan, Excel, Windows support.