Softwr

Software · head to head

Greenhouse vs LangSmith

Greenhouse logo

Greenhouse

Software

Hiring software for growing companies

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
L

LangSmith

Software

Know what your agents are really doing

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; LangSmith usage beyond the included trace allotment is billed in LangChain Compute Units at $1.50 per LCU and Storage Units at $1.00 per LSU, an unfamiliar metering unit compared to flat per-seat pricing, as of August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and LangSmith actually diverge.

Attributes where Greenhouse and LangSmith differ
AttributeGreenhouseLangSmith
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiWeb
Founded2012Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Greenhouse

  • Applicant tracking
  • Interview scheduling
  • Scorecard system
  • Job board posting
  • Candidate CRM
  • Reporting & analytics
  • Offer management
  • EEO compliance

Only in LangSmith

Nothing recorded that Greenhouse does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Greenhouse

  • Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot LangSmith
  • AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot LangSmith

LangSmith

No use cases recorded yet. See the LangSmith review.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Greenhouse

  • Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
  • Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
  • Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
  • Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
  • Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
  • Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox

LangSmith

  • Usage beyond the included trace allotment is billed in LangChain Compute Units at $1.50 per LCU and Storage Units at $1.00 per LSU, an unfamiliar metering unit compared to flat per-seat pricing, as of August 2026.

Pricing, plan by plan

Greenhouse

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.

LangSmith

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the LangSmith review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Greenhouse if

  • You need applicant tracking.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want interview scheduling.
Greenhouse review

Choose LangSmith if

Nothing in the data separates LangSmith from Greenhouse on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

LangSmith review

Questions people ask

Is Greenhouse or LangSmith better?
Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and LangSmith at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or LangSmith?
Greenhouse starts at On request and LangSmith at On request.
Does Greenhouse or LangSmith run on more platforms?
Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. LangSmith runs on Web.
What is Greenhouse best used for?
Greenhouse is most often used for applicant tracking system for structured hiring, ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing. Of those, applicant tracking system for structured hiring and ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing are not what LangSmith is typically brought in for.
What can Greenhouse do that LangSmith cannot?
Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Greenhouse

More on LangSmith

Keep looking

Other head to heads