Software · head to head
Greenhouse vs Harvest

Harvest
Software
Time tracking software for teams that care about where their time goes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Harvest has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups; Harvest the free plan is one seat and two projects, so it suits a solo freelancer and nothing larger
- They diverge on capability: Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Harvest covers Time tracking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Greenhouse and Harvest actually diverge.
| Attribute | Greenhouse | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android, Api | Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2012 | 2006 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
Only in Harvest
- Time tracking
- Expense tracking
- Invoicing
- Project budgets
- Team capacity
- Detailed reports
- Mobile apps
- Browser extension
Both cover
- Slack
- GDPR
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot Harvest
- AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot Harvest
Harvest
- Time tracking against projects and clientsnot Greenhouse
- Turning tracked time into invoicesnot Greenhouse
- Expense capture alongside billable hoursnot Greenhouse
- Team capacity and utilisation reporting on the paid plansnot Greenhouse
- Feeding billed time into QuickBooks or Xeronot Greenhouse
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Harvest
- The free plan is one seat and two projects, so it suits a solo freelancer and nothing larger
- Team reporting and unlimited projects require the Teams plan at $9 per seat per month
- Profitability reporting, timesheet approvals and custom reports need Enterprise at $14 per seat per month
- SAML single sign-on is Enterprise only
- QuickBooks, Xero and Stripe integrations are withheld from the free plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Harvest
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Harvest review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Choose Harvest if
- You need time tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want expense tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Greenhouse or Harvest better?
- Neither clearly leads. Greenhouse starts at On request and Harvest at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Harvest?
- Harvest has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Greenhouse and Free for Harvest.
- Does Greenhouse or Harvest run on more platforms?
- Greenhouse runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Harvest runs on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Harvest for free?
- Yes. Harvest has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Greenhouse starts at On request.
- What is Greenhouse best used for?
- Greenhouse is most often used for applicant tracking system for structured hiring, ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing. Of those, applicant tracking system for structured hiring and ai-powered interview notetaking and sourcing are not what Harvest is typically brought in for.
- What can Greenhouse do that Harvest cannot?
- Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. Harvest covers Time tracking, Expense tracking, Invoicing, Project budgets. Both handle Slack, GDPR.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Monday.com
- Greenhouse vs Notion
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Datadog
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs PyCharm
- Greenhouse vs Sketch
- Greenhouse vs Docker
- Greenhouse vs Netlify
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs Aha!
- Greenhouse vs Coda
- Greenhouse vs Dashlane
- Greenhouse vs GitHub
- Greenhouse vs Toggl Track
- Greenhouse vs Avaza
- Greenhouse vs BigTime
- Greenhouse vs Function Point
- Harvest vs Asana
- Harvest vs ClickUp
- Harvest vs Figma
- Harvest vs Linear
- Harvest vs Monday.com
- Harvest vs Notion
- Harvest vs Amplitude
- Harvest vs Datadog
- Harvest vs PostHog
- Harvest vs PyCharm
- Harvest vs Sketch
- Harvest vs Docker
- Harvest vs Netlify
- Harvest vs Okta
- Harvest vs Aha!
- Harvest vs Coda
- Harvest vs Dashlane
- Harvest vs GitHub
- Harvest vs Toggl Track
- Harvest vs Avaza
- Harvest vs BigTime
- Harvest vs Function Point

