Softwr

Software · head to head

Conservis vs Agronomic

Conservis logo

Conservis

Software

Comprehensive farm management for row crops

From
On request
Rated
-
A

Agronomic

Software

Data-driven nutrient management

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Agronomic has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Conservis acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio; Agronomic add-on only to FieldAlytics, not a standalone product
  • They diverge on capability: Conservis covers Field & crop planning, Agronomic covers Soil analysis.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Conservis and Agronomic actually diverge.

Attributes where Conservis and Agronomic differ
AttributeConservisAgronomic
Starting priceOn requestFree
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, Ios, Android, ApiWeb, Mobile
Founded20092013

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Conservis

  • Field & crop planning
  • Input management
  • Activity tracking
  • Financial management
  • Inventory control
  • Equipment tracking
  • Harvest tracking
  • Custom reporting

Only in Agronomic

  • Soil analysis
  • Nutrient recommendations
  • Variable rate maps
  • Tissue testing
  • Fertility planning
  • Ag Leader
  • Laboratory systems
  • Ios support

Both cover

  • John Deere
  • Climate FieldView
  • SSL
  • Data encryption
  • Cloud deployment
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Conservis

  • Farm ERP covering the business rather than the agronomynot Agronomic
  • Grain contract managementnot Agronomic
  • Crop planning and budgeting against actualsnot Agronomic
  • Work order management across an operationnot Agronomic
  • Reporting plans versus actuals for lenders and partnersnot Agronomic

Agronomic

  • Soil samplingnot Conservis
  • Nutrient planningnot Conservis
  • Variable rate fertilizernot Conservis
  • Crop consultingnot Conservis

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Conservis

  • Acquired by TELUS Agriculture and Rabobank in July 2021, so it is now part of a larger agriculture portfolio

Agronomic

  • Add-on only to FieldAlytics, not a standalone product
  • Pricing requires sales contact, not transparently published
  • Takes 3-4 days to reflect rainfall impacts in recommendations
  • No direct competitor to Climate FieldView's broader analytics capabilities

Pricing, plan by plan

Conservis

On request
  • Standard$undefined/year
    • Field management
    • Activity tracking
    • Basic reporting
  • Professional$undefined/year
    • Everything in Standard
    • Financial management
    • Inventory control
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Everything in Professional
    • Multi-entity management
    • API access

Agronomic

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Basic soil analysis
    • Weather data
    • Limited recommendations
  • Professional$89/month
    • Advanced soil testing
    • Nutrient management
    • Prescription maps
  • Consultant$199/month
    • Multi-client management
    • White-label reports
    • API access

Which should you pick?

Choose Conservis if

  • You need field & crop planning.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
  • You also want input management.

Choose Agronomic if

  • You need soil analysis.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Mobile.
  • You also want nutrient recommendations.

Questions people ask

Is Conservis or Agronomic better?
Neither clearly leads. Conservis starts at On request and Agronomic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Conservis or Agronomic?
Agronomic has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Conservis and Free for Agronomic.
Does Conservis or Agronomic run on more platforms?
Conservis runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Agronomic runs on Web, Mobile.
Can I use Agronomic for free?
Yes. Agronomic has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Conservis starts at On request.
What is Conservis best used for?
Conservis is most often used for farm erp covering the business rather than the agronomy, grain contract management, crop planning and budgeting against actuals, work order management across an operation. Of those, farm erp covering the business rather than the agronomy and grain contract management are not what Agronomic is typically brought in for.
What can Conservis do that Agronomic cannot?
Conservis covers Field & crop planning, Input management, Activity tracking, Financial management. Agronomic covers Soil analysis, Nutrient recommendations, Variable rate maps, Tissue testing. Both handle John Deere, Climate FieldView, SSL, Data encryption.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Agronomic: How does Adapt-N generate nitrogen recommendations?

Adapt-N uses 13 interconnected models that process soil characteristics, crop history, real-time weather data, manure applications, and irrigation information to generate field-specific nitrogen recommendations. It requires a minimum of 7 core data inputs, though spatial data significantly improves accuracy.

Source
Agronomic: Where is Adapt-N available?

Adapt-N is available across the lower 48 U.S. states and six Canadian provinces: British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec.

Source
Agronomic: Is Adapt-N a standalone product or add-on?

Adapt-N is an optional paid add-on service for FieldAlytics users. It is not available as a standalone product; farmers must use it through the FieldAlytics platform via Ever.Ag.

Source
Agronomic: How long does Adapt-N take to reflect weather changes?

Adapt-N takes 3 to 4 days after rainfall events to fully reflect environmental impacts in its nitrogen recommendations.

Source

Related pages

Other head to heads