Software · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs Apache Pinot

Apache Pinot
Software
Real-time distributed OLAP datastore for analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); Apache Pinot self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and Apache Pinot actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | Apache Pinot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Founded | 2015 | 1999 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in Apache Pinot
- Real-time Analytics
- Column-oriented
- Distributed Processing
- SQL Support
- Pluggable Indexing
- Star-tree Index
- Upsert Support
- Kafka
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot Apache Pinot
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot Apache Pinot
Apache Pinot
- Sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested datanot Cockroach Labs
- User-facing dashboards inside a productnot Cockroach Labs
- Real-time metrics at high ingest ratesnot Cockroach Labs
- Petabyte-scale analytics as run at LinkedIn and Ubernot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
Apache Pinot
- Self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
- Managed hosting comes from third parties such as StarTree rather than from the project
- Built for user-facing real-time OLAP, so it is not a general purpose database
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
Apache Pinot
Free- Open SourceFree
- Real-time analytics
- SQL queries
- Horizontal scaling
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose Apache Pinot if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want column-oriented.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or Apache Pinot better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Apache Pinot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or Apache Pinot?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and Apache Pinot at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or Apache Pinot run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. Apache Pinot runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what Apache Pinot is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that Apache Pinot cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Column-oriented, Distributed Processing, SQL Support.
Related pages
More on Cockroach Labs
More on Apache Pinot
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs PlanetScale
- Cockroach Labs vs Azure SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs ClickHouse
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs DuckDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DynamoDB
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Redshift
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Cassandra
- Cockroach Labs vs CouchDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Firebolt
- Apache Pinot vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pinot vs Airtable
- Apache Pinot vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Pinot vs Elasticsearch
- Apache Pinot vs PlanetScale
- Apache Pinot vs Azure SQL
- Apache Pinot vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pinot vs Couchbase
- Apache Pinot vs DuckDB
- Apache Pinot vs DynamoDB
- Apache Pinot vs MariaDB
- Apache Pinot vs Oracle Database
- Apache Pinot vs Amazon RDS
- Apache Pinot vs Amazon Redshift
- Apache Pinot vs Apache Druid
- Apache Pinot vs Cassandra
- Apache Pinot vs CouchDB
- Apache Pinot vs Firebolt

